RUSSIANS SAY: "NUKE THE GULF OIL LEAK" | |
R... User ID: 572408 Netherlands 05/25/2010 11:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | this is what I said in the begining -- nuke it! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 946464Then you must be the glp idiot. it's what many experts said from the beginning "A strange game. The only winning move is not to play." - 'Wargames' "This world is more like a mystery, trapped in a conundrum, spun by a paradox." - AC1118155 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 928496 South Korea 05/25/2010 11:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 871629 Portugal 05/25/2010 11:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 883744 United States 05/25/2010 11:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yea, well the Russians are fuckin idiots, and so is anyone else that thinks a BOMB is going to help!...... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 975703. what makes you think it woudnt? These wacko's are all thinking a surface warhead delivered like Hiroshima, for frak sake.... Morans! What they'd do, is drill a shaft near the leaking well, insert the nuke far under the surface of the sea floor, seal the shaft with cement, and detonate it. The blast and heat will crush the pipe under the sea floor, and the heat will create an underground sphere of molten material, hopefully simultaneously cauterizing the leak. I agree with the Russians... I think it would work. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 750658 United States 05/25/2010 11:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yea, well the Russians are fuckin idiots, and so is anyone else that thinks a BOMB is going to help!...... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 883744. what makes you think it woudnt? These wacko's are all thinking a surface warhead delivered like Hiroshima, for frak sake.... Morans! What they'd do, is drill a shaft near the leaking well, insert the nuke far under the surface of the sea floor, seal the shaft with cement, and detonate it. The blast and heat will crush the pipe under the sea floor, and the heat will create an underground sphere of molten material, hopefully simultaneously cauterizing the leak. I agree with the Russians... I think it would work. think fuck somebody on here has some working brain cells. I think it's the only solution they have. Not a sure thing by any stretch but no other options at this point. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 981822 United States 05/25/2010 11:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 619959 Canada 05/25/2010 11:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yea, well the Russians are fuckin idiots, and so is anyone else that thinks a BOMB is going to help!...... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 883744. what makes you think it woudnt? These wacko's are all thinking a surface warhead delivered like Hiroshima, for frak sake.... Morans! What they'd do, is drill a shaft near the leaking well, insert the nuke far under the surface of the sea floor, seal the shaft with cement, and detonate it. The blast and heat will crush the pipe under the sea floor, and the heat will create an underground sphere of molten material, hopefully simultaneously cauterizing the leak. I agree with the Russians... I think it would work. I was just going to try and explain to these arm chair idiots but you beat me to it. |
Shaun1111 User ID: 567273 United States 05/25/2010 11:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 963431 United States 05/25/2010 11:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 981500 Australia 05/25/2010 11:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
expat2368 User ID: 978165 Moldova 05/25/2010 11:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yea, well the Russians are fuckin idiots, and so is anyone else that thinks a BOMB is going to help!...... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 619959. what makes you think it woudnt? These wacko's are all thinking a surface warhead delivered like Hiroshima, for frak sake.... Morans! What they'd do, is drill a shaft near the leaking well, insert the nuke far under the surface of the sea floor, seal the shaft with cement, and detonate it. The blast and heat will crush the pipe under the sea floor, and the heat will create an underground sphere of molten material, hopefully simultaneously cauterizing the leak. I agree with the Russians... I think it would work. I was just going to try and explain to these arm chair idiots but you beat me to it. Nuking it IS the only option. Should have been done already. "Any treatment, regardless of its effectiveness will be suppressed by Big Pharma if they cannot profit from it" A quote from and in memory of my good friend JAB who was the Ultimate Big Pharma Insider. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 946464 United States 05/25/2010 11:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yea, well the Russians are fuckin idiots, and so is anyone else that thinks a BOMB is going to help!...... Here's a story for you. In 91 when 170 well fires burned, the Russians idea to put out the fires was to mount a jet engine on a tank turret and blow the fire out! Dumb muther fuckers! What they didn't think of was what to do after the fire was out and 1000's of gallons of crude shooting in the air coming back down! True story! . |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 682262 United States 05/25/2010 11:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 981500 Australia 05/25/2010 11:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 682262 United States 05/25/2010 11:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 978567 United States 05/25/2010 11:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What happens when you flash boil millions of tons of frozen methane Hydrates? Quoting: FatalWishesI don't think nuking the site is a very good idea. Indeed what would a nuke do to all that methane? It just doesn't seem realistic. IMHO, they should just try to suck out the oil from the gulf for the next 30 years until the flow stops. There's really no way to fix this we will have to suffer |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 619959 Canada 05/25/2010 11:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Barack Obama sends nuclear experts to tackle BP's Gulf of Mexico oil leak The US has sent a team of nuclear physicists to help BP plug the "catastrophic" flow of oil into the Gulf of Mexico from its leaking Deepwater Horizon well, as the Obama administration becomes frustrated with the oil giant's inability to control the situation. [link to www.telegraph.co.uk] |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 936261 Canada 05/25/2010 11:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yea, well the Russians are fuckin idiots, and so is anyone else that thinks a BOMB is going to help!...... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 883744. what makes you think it woudnt? These wacko's are all thinking a surface warhead delivered like Hiroshima, for frak sake.... Morans! What they'd do, is drill a shaft near the leaking well, insert the nuke far under the surface of the sea floor, seal the shaft with cement, and detonate it. The blast and heat will crush the pipe under the sea floor, and the heat will create an underground sphere of molten material, hopefully simultaneously cauterizing the leak. I agree with the Russians... I think it would work. There is a very, very deep pocket/pool of oil and gas under the Gulf of Mexico - mostly gas. There is now presently methane saturated sea water, that has been leaking out for over a month now. What do you think will cause this pool of gas and oil under the seabed to reach a breaking point? The combustion and explosion of a nuclear device in or on the ocean floor could act like a trigger, a percussion device to produce an earthquake, kind of like shaking a gigantic soda bottle really hard. The percussion from this nuclear explosion could shake the gas under the seabed creating a deadly storm of methane bubbles. Once the ocean floor is breeched, methane will gas begin bubbling out and ignite with the slightest spark. The resulting eruption will cause a chain reaction and firestorm that would be 10,000 times greater than the nuclear stock pile of the world at this moment. Methane bearing water clouds will surface and ignite, turning the Gulf of Mexico into a Lake of Fire, and consume parts of Mexico and the Southern States. Nukes should be out of the question, as well as any other explosive device. There has to be a better way. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 619959 Canada 05/25/2010 11:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What happens when you flash boil millions of tons of frozen methane Hydrates? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 978567I don't think nuking the site is a very good idea. Indeed what would a nuke do to all that methane? It just doesn't seem realistic. IMHO, they should just try to suck out the oil from the gulf for the next 30 years until the flow stops. There's really no way to fix this we will have to suffer you're nuts... this has to be stopped! |
G. House User ID: 981832 Netherlands 05/25/2010 11:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yea, well the Russians are fuckin idiots, and so is anyone else that thinks a BOMB is going to help!...... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 883744. what makes you think it woudnt? These wacko's are all thinking a surface warhead delivered like Hiroshima, for frak sake.... Morans! What they'd do, is drill a shaft near the leaking well, insert the nuke far under the surface of the sea floor, seal the shaft with cement, and detonate it. The blast and heat will crush the pipe under the sea floor, and the heat will create an underground sphere of molten material, hopefully simultaneously cauterizing the leak. I agree with the Russians... I think it would work. Well, you see they did a lot of underground tests in Nevada. None of which were supposed to leak stuff back to the surface. Oddly enough MOST of them did leak at the surface. And the stuff they leaked wasn't a liquid under 20,000psi or more. Chances are they would get a huge amount of fractured rock on top of the hole. Fractured rock is porous to liquids you know. So all in all there is a LARGE chance you could make the situation even worse, much much worse in fact. And this doesn't even factor in that what would be leaking would now be radioactive to boot! "Everybody lies." |
Jasmine User ID: 972614 United States 05/26/2010 12:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yea, well the Russians are fuckin idiots, and so is anyone else that thinks a BOMB is going to help!...... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 936261. what makes you think it woudnt? These wacko's are all thinking a surface warhead delivered like Hiroshima, for frak sake.... Morans! What they'd do, is drill a shaft near the leaking well, insert the nuke far under the surface of the sea floor, seal the shaft with cement, and detonate it. The blast and heat will crush the pipe under the sea floor, and the heat will create an underground sphere of molten material, hopefully simultaneously cauterizing the leak. I agree with the Russians... I think it would work. There is a very, very deep pocket/pool of oil and gas under the Gulf of Mexico - mostly gas. There is now presently methane saturated sea water, that has been leaking out for over a month now. What do you think will cause this pool of gas and oil under the seabed to reach a breaking point? The combustion and explosion of a nuclear device in or on the ocean floor could act like a trigger, a percussion device to produce an earthquake, kind of like shaking a gigantic soda bottle really hard. The percussion from this nuclear explosion could shake the gas under the seabed creating a deadly storm of methane bubbles. Once the ocean floor is breeched, methane will gas begin bubbling out and ignite with the slightest spark. The resulting eruption will cause a chain reaction and firestorm that would be 10,000 times greater than the nuclear stock pile of the world at this moment. Methane bearing water clouds will surface and ignite, turning the Gulf of Mexico into a Lake of Fire, and consume parts of Mexico and the Southern States. Nukes should be out of the question, as well as any other explosive device. There has to be a better way. Well, if Babylon is indeed the United States as some have stated, then nuking might fulfill the next chapter… Revelations Chapter 18, read it and weep. I am not a bible thumper, but I did sleep at a Holiday Inn. |
WhiteKnighD User ID: 964277 United States 05/26/2010 12:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 981500 Australia 05/26/2010 12:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Demode User ID: 981499 Serbia 05/26/2010 12:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Oh, so this is why they are mobilizing National Guard in Southern states and this is why Russian Troops are spotted in San Diego. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 757124They are going to nuke the Gulf together with Russians. You do know San Diego is no where near the Gulf of Mexico right? Sure I do, but Gulf of Mexico is nowhere near sea route from Russia. They must have brought some equipment that could fit the ship(s) only. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 833545 United States 05/26/2010 12:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 978552 United States 05/26/2010 12:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 981500 Australia 05/26/2010 12:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Demode User ID: 981499 Serbia 05/26/2010 12:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Anonymous Coward 981500 LOL!!! The Darvaza area is rich in natural gas. While drilling in 1971 geologists accidentally found an underground cavern filled with natural gas. The ground beneath the drilling rig collapsed, leaving a large hole with a diameter of about 50-100 meters. To avoid poisonous gas discharge, it was decided to burn the gas. Geologists had hoped the fire would go out in a few days but it has been burning ever since. Locals have named the cavern The Door to Hell. Next to capturing the gas, flaring is safer and friendlier to the environment than releasing the methane into the atmosphere as methane is a relatively potent greenhouse gas with a high global warming potential of 72 (averaged over 20 years) or 25 (averaged over 100 years). |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 975204 Canada 05/26/2010 12:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 973415 United States 05/26/2010 12:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |