Nibiru? Planet X? Well.......here is your answer

Just look at Venus, western sky just above horizon. Never seen it so bright

That's a supernova remnant, it's not a solar system object.

They didn't even check it and they just posted to get on peeps nerves.

+1

Thank you for this info((easily verifiable - you BS flag flying douchebags)), OP. Ignore the lame naysayers. If its orbit will bring it no closer than Pluto's orbit - what can you suppose its effects here on Earth to be?

I've seen it that bright many a time, but that aside, you're seriously suggesting that Venus is getting brighter because of "Nibiru" yet we can't actually see the thing in our solar system that's causing Venus to get so much brighter? That doesn't even begin to make any sense.

I can spot pluto so why wouldn't I be able to spot this object? Furthermore, why isn't it having any effects on the positions of the planet, especially small dwarf planets like pluto? Pluto should be way out of place if something large and bright enough to cause OTHER planets to appear too bright is currently passing by the orbital radius of pluto.

Last Edited by Astromut on 06/16/2010 12:19 PM

The OP asked the debunker , whats his profession ?
The OP has stated that he is a scientist. What about the debunker? An artist, janitor, a cook , TV repairman ? Come on man answer the OP . We want to know !

Are you ashamed to answer ?

that is not entirely correct, nasa does believe this but many other countries do not, everybody gives you too much credit astronut, just because you are some dweeb with a backyard telescope, that does not make you a scientist.

Pluto has suffered the impact, heating and disruption of a new celestial body too close to its orbit Clearly, the stellar attraction between the two stars, gravitational orbit shrinks from the rest of the planets, and clearly verified the theories of Dr. Michael P. Aubry, Christopher T. Russell, and Margaret G. Kivelson and the model proposed by Dr. John. J. Matese, and Dr. John. B. Murray, and the comments made by Dr. Geoffrey W. Marcy and Ben. R. Oppenheimer. The model has been closed. There you go astronut, fucking dumbass

Why do some people need to resort to name calling and just debate it like mature humans?

Calling people dweebs because you not agree with them entirely is counterproductive to the debate.

The fact is that there are changes in our solar system, but there is no conclusive evidence to what is causing that, could be a normal cycle with the sun or some other things we don't quite understand yet.

What countries think this is a solar system object? Where is the evidence of its motion against the background stars indicating it to be in the solar system? Where is the evidence of its massive stellar parallax caused by its close proximity?

Sounds like jealousy.

My training and education makes me a scientist, not my telescope.

But in 2007, X-ray observations made with NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory revealed that the object was much larger than the last time it was observed! It had grown in size by 16%. Puzzled by this observation, the Very Large Array repeated its observations of 23 years ago and verified that it had increased in size considerably. Knowing that supernova do not expand this quickly, unless they have just exploded, they explained that G1.9 must be a "very young" supernova -- perhaps not more than 150 years old. But no record of a visible supernova has been found corresponding to that historical period (about the time of the American Civil War).

Spanish astronomers have tracked this object with great interest because they were anticipating its appearance. Gravitational anomalies have been appearing in the Oort Cloud for some time, suggesting the perturbations were caused by a nearby object with considerable mass. The announcement that G1.9 had increased in size was no mystery to them. It is exactly what they would expect as the object moved closer to Earth.

want me to keep going astronut? you better tell trinity to pay you more to pump half ass information to keep people busy....

Please do. I want to see him wipe the floor with you.

Then why is it still following its predicted orbit and not showing obligatory massive perturbations from such a celestial body passing too close?

So you think this object is a star then? Holy cow, do you have any clue how even the smallest possible brown dwarf would distrupt the orbit of pluto if it passed close to pluto's orbital radius?

Your rather nonsensical description didn't answer my question. Insult me all you want, but it won't change the truth.

I really hope you nibirutards let this shit die in 2012. It's certainly gone on long enough. I know you'll all be resistant to letting go of this belief, damn near religious as it is, but you have to stop believing in fairy tells at some point. A good portion of you will likely die at your cult leaders command and many more will blow their brains out when they realize they've lived recklessly expecting an imaginary planet to destroy the earth but more than likely, you'll just say "2012 was wrong, its 2013"......

Yeah, no kidding, that's what young supernova remnants do, they grow. If this were a solar system object the coordinates would be changing, quite dramatically over a multi-year time span. So why aren't they?

Why should there be? Galactic dust prevents us from seeing anything of it in visible light anyway, the visible light explosion would have been similarly obscured.

You can cut and paste with the best of them.

I suppose next your going to tell us that the gravity of Uranus is the reason your head is stuck up your ass?

Hey OP, Thank you form the information. GLP is a wonderful forum for sharing and reporting information and news. Unfortunately, perhaps, there are people here who will bust your balls just for the sake of busting your balls regardless of the proof you bring forward or your credibility. Those people will always be here and frankly, sometimes, that's perhaps a good thing. Knowing that upfront, this then is not THEIR problem, it's your problem... you're not tough enough to ignore the assholes . Just do your thing and keep reporting regardless.

Yes, the hilarious "Starviewer team" right? And they explain the complete lack of parallax or stellar motion... how?

Orbiting at about 25000 AUs according to the current proposal.

It still doesn't answer my question or prove in any way that it is a solar system object. It's confirmation bias by those who wish to overlook the evidence that is required to prove that an object is within the solar system.

LMFAO! You're a riot! Hey Trinity, where's the check you "owe me" for pumping "half ass information" on your forum? This guy says you're paying me, but my bank account begs to differ.

TRANSLATION: Don’t listen to smart people and keep ignoring the facts OP. I love to pretend too and we shouldn’t let reality get in our way! WOO WOOs RULE!

PROFESSIONAL scientists have SEEN it and have PUBLISHED about it.

On Dec. 30, 1983, these scientists’ story was written up by reporter Thomas O’Toole and published in the Washington Post. The story claimed that scientists had identified a body possibly as large as Jupiter. This body would later be named as the 10th planet in our solar system.
Article Title: “Possibly as Large as Jupiter; Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered”
[link to webcache.googleusercontent.com]

In 2005, scientists officially announced to the public their finding that our solar system has a tenth planet and they named it 2003 UB313 (They later changed this name to Xena, Planet X). This discovery was document in the July 30, 2005 issue of Astronomy magazine.
Article Title: “Tenth planet discovered”
[link to www2.astronomy.com]
The discovery of the tenth planet in our solar system was also commemorated with an article that was noted on the cover of the Sunday New York Times' Parade Magazine in January of 2006.

On April 15, 2010, scientists confirmed the presence of a persistent "perturber" body in the vicinity of our neighborhood (the Oort Cloud).

Article Title: “Persistent Evidence of a Jovian Mass Solar Companion in the Oort Cloud”

John J. Matese and Daniel P. Whitmire
Department of Physics
University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA, 70504-4210 USA

Submitted to the journal ICARUS on 15 April 2010.
Pages: 41 including 2 cover sheets, 39 text pages, 2 tables, 9 figures

Matese and Whitmire prepublished this account in an electronic astrophysics magazine published by Cornell University called arXiv (an e-print service).

[link to xxx.lanl.gov]

[link to xxx.lanl.gov]

The second link is a PDF version of the entire article and its references.

Abstract: We present an updated dynamical and statistical analysis of outer Oort cloud cometary evidence suggesting the sun has a wide-binary Jovian mass companion. The results support a conjecture that there exists a companion of mass ~ 1-4 M_Jup orbiting in the innermost region of the outer Oort cloud. Our most restrictive prediction is that the orientation angles of the orbit normal in galactic coordinates are centered on the galactic longitude of the ascending node Omega = 319 degree and the galactic inclination i = 103 degree (or the opposite direction) with an uncertainty in the normal direction subtending ~ 2% of the sky. A Bayesian statistical analysis suggests that the probability of the companion hypothesis is comparable to or greater than the probability of the null hypothesis of a statistical fluke. Such a companion could also have produced the detached Kuiper Belt object Sedna. The putative companion could be easily detected by the recently launched Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE).

The references associated with this publication indicate scientific acceptance of the presence of a massive solar companion of the "wide" binary cool brown dwarf variety (a.k.a. Sun's Nemesis, Planet X, distant large solar system planet).

The presence of this massive body in the outer solar system is based on cometary evidence. Apparently, the galactic tide is perturbed this body's interplanetary magnetic field and this has affected the orbits of 200 comets. Most specifically, the presence of this massive body has caused changes in the osculating orbit of 110 existing long-period comets that exist in the cloud of comets surrounding our solar system (the Oort Cloud).

The references also indicate that scientists are concerned that this distant solar companion has caused mass species extinctions on Earth by causing periodic comet showers to rain down on the Earth from interstellar space.

Evidence that lends credence to the idea that the massive body can produce comets that could impact or have impacted Earth is the fact that it is thought to be the origin of Sedna (2003 VB12) and, thus, could be the origin of more Sedna-like objects in the future. Sedna is described as a trans-Neptunian object that is a likely dwarf planet (or planetoid) that was discovered in 2003.

There IS a tenth planet in our solar system. It is on a very long orbit around our sun. It passes very close to earth's orbit once every 3600 years.

When Planet X (Nibiru, "the winged planet") with its massive size equivalent to between one and FOUR that of Jupiter re-enters our solar system, it causes electromagnetic effects and gravitational effects.

It first affects the geomagnetic activity of our sun (happening now). As it draws closer to Earth, it causes changes in the outer planets first (happening now: Pluto has heated up and its surface has changed colors to a mottled appearance, Neptune is showing "spots" on one side, Uranus has brightened significantly, Saturn has developed a massive rotating hexagonal storm system at one pole, Jupiter has lost its southern "stripe"). Planet X also deflects comets from the Oort cloud toward our solar system.

The Vatican knows this information, the American military knows this information, and the governments of the U.S., Russia, China, Japan, Germany, and the UK know this information.

The governments are not telling the people because there is no way to protect ALL of the people and the knowledge would cause mass panic and chaos.

Hey, I have a quick question.
Do you plagiarize all your material or do you own this website that you keep quoting from as your own comments? [link to viewzone2.com]

This IRAS claim has been debunked over and over and over again. It turned out that nothing they had detected was inside the solar system.