Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine

This is a troubling discussion, but it feels like a moment where we could see rapid change..
Honestly, I thought I was fairly well versed regarding the DNA contamination issues, but I learned a whole lot from this video.
It's worth the 2 hours...It's a Schmorgasboard of issues!

[link to rumble.com (secure)]

SV40:
15m00s: The SV40 promoter DNA was not identified in the plasmid, was likely purposefully omitted by Pfizer, and was not looked for by any regulators.
16m10s: Health Canada expects sponsors to identify any biologically active sequences in a plasmid, such as an SV40 enhancer.
-> Health Canada have subsequently confirmed that there is DNA contamination, that SV40 promoter is there, and was not declared.
19m20s: McKernan explains they left out the 72bp tandem repeat SV40 promoter, which drives DNA straight to the nucleus in hours.

F1 origin:
19m30s: Pfizer also left out the "F1 origin", which makes single-stranded DNA.

Why they hid SV40:
19m55s: McKernan thinks this is why they hid it
-> They started manufacturing process and realised they left in a mammalian promoter (good for research, bad for people).
-> It's active in mammalian cells, and not just in the cytoplasm, straight to the nucleus too..integration risk.
-> Since we're dealing with LNPs, this DNA will get there uninhibited.
-> This probably got deleted from their disclosure. "Someone hid something".

Another BIG problem; 'anti-sense strand' open reading frame for the spike in the reverse-direction!
25m50s: There is an open reading frame (ORF) in both directions over the spike protein in Pfizer.
-> That is a very long unexpected ORF (1230 amino acids), start codon to stop codon, running the opposite direction of the spike in Pfizer's vaccine.
-> This will also be a bioactive molecule, and will not be recognised as 'self'.
-> Everyone wrote this finding off, when it was thought to be only in the mod-mRNA codon-optimised sequence; but now we have it in contaminating plasmid DNA sequences!
-> RNA for this reverse-seq will be made, but it is inknown whether ribosomes will read it.. (depends on there being a "Kozak consensus sequence").
-> This is a flag, creating risks, and no regulator looked at it.

Legal precedent for suing manufacturer when product is contaminated/adulterated
38m30s: Remdesivir contaminated with glass, recipient sued, judge said indemnity only applied for the approved components of your product.
-> No legal indemnity for contaminants, so they can be sued.
40m40s: Pfizer will claim the DNA is all broken up, is in the limits, etc..
-> The legal limits are obsolete because these DNA fragments are coated in LNP, making them more dangerous.
42m20s: This will go to the nucleus and create a genotoxic event
-> No studies were done on genotoxicity (I can confirm this, from the EMA submissions).
-> Important note: Those DNA limits were 1000-fold lower befiore the Reagan NCVA-act.

Do cells transfected just die?
44m00s: Any cell that integrated foreign DNA in theory will be killed.
-> There are immune-privileged areas where the cells will survive...(ovaries, testes, eyes,...)
-> Bio-distribution shows LNP accumulation in many of these immune-privelidged areas.
45m00s: Phagocytic cells can take up bacterial plasmid DNA - amplified massively by LNP-coating.

Triple Helix:
47m: What is likely being picked up by cells is a DNA:RNA hybrid, left over by the enzymes used to break up the plasmids.
-> Triple helix. Thread: Thread: Triple Helix: CONFIRMED. 20-Oct-2023
-> McKernan imagines some ugly things go on in a cell transfected by triple-stranded material.

"Watson-strand" RNA
(Watson and Crick discovered DNA, there is a 'Crick' strand to complement 'Watson')
48m: We see all sorts of "Watson-strand" RNA that should not be there,
-> lots of double-stranded RNA in the injections, too.
-> Methyl-decoration will likely cause ELISA to undercount it.


Danger for pregnant women and unborn children
49m: One thing always to avoid for pregnant women is 'systemic inflammation'.
-> These extra DNA and anti-sense contaminants likely to cause body-wide systemic inflammation
-> Regulators are STILL telling pregnant women to get these shots.
51m: Vax DNA contamination is likely getting through to unborn children, and mothers/babies exchange DNA normally anyway..
-> Amniosentecis no longer done because they can sequence the kid's DNA from the mother's blood.

CDC/FDA/HCan ( & likely UK MHRA) totally corrupt.
54m50s They are conflicted, funded by companies they regulate.
-> This is a global problem.
58m Chris Martenson regulators/pharma are starting to lose badly.
-> Getting close to the part of the story where it becomes 'Common Knowledge'.
-> The story can turn very quickly here.
-> Brings up the 30 people, now all deceased, after injections on same day at same location..
-> Thread: Thread: BOOM! 30 people had the covid jab on same day at the same clinic in New Zealand... Now all dead!
-> Feels like a CYA moment from Health Canada, admitting they were not told about contamination.
-> (1h13m) To date, no regulator has tried to contact Kevin McKernan, who discovered the DNA contamination, even after he presented it at VRBPAC.

Adverse events found only in the mass-manufactured lots were excluded from analysis:
1h5m15s: Pfizer/Regulators only consider the adverse events found in 'process 1' (cleaner manufacturing) for analysis in vials made with 'Process 2' (E.Coli, DNA plasmid replication, for the plebs)
-> AE's found only in process 2 lots were NOT investigated.
-> Came from Joseph Fraiman interviewed on Dr Drew, recorded FDA official admitting it.


Implications for blood transfusions:
1h26m Service providers must screen for vaxxes i.e. components (incl. plasmid DNA)
-> Need to determine a 'washourt period' which might be very long if DNA integrates...