9/11 Truth - Proof that the Pentagon "plane" crash was a black ops operation. | |
THNKuCLLR User ID: 78789847 United States 05/04/2020 04:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72541933 United States 05/04/2020 05:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So a plane was carrying a missile and at a very low altitude near the Pentagon dropped it and flew over the Pentagon as the missile hit. That fireball probably distracted eye witnesses from realizing the plane grazed the top of the building. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77022856 Sweden 05/04/2020 06:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78867692 Canada 05/04/2020 06:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 26372416 United States 05/04/2020 07:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So a plane was carrying a missile and at a very low altitude near the Pentagon dropped it and flew over the Pentagon as the missile hit. That fireball probably distracted eye witnesses from realizing the plane grazed the top of the building. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72541933 Bombs get dropped. Missles get fired or launched. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70672556 United Kingdom 05/04/2020 07:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So a plane was carrying a missile and at a very low altitude near the Pentagon dropped it and flew over the Pentagon as the missile hit. That fireball probably distracted eye witnesses from realizing the plane grazed the top of the building. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72541933 No. Witness near the Citgo service station saw a commercial jet (not necessarily carrying passengers, of course) fly low OVER the Pentagon towards Ronald Regan Airport. It could not have carried bombs or fired missiles and I think it was meant to be a distraction for the actual missile that hit the Pentagon at almost the same time. It was flying in a path south of Citgo, whereas the path of Flight 77 was supposed to be north of the Citgo. The path of damage inside the Pentagon proves that the flight path of the missile as it hit was north of the Citgo and so the plane could not have fired a missile or dropped a bomb causing this damage. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78785509 United States 05/04/2020 08:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So a plane was carrying a missile and at a very low altitude near the Pentagon dropped it and flew over the Pentagon as the missile hit. That fireball probably distracted eye witnesses from realizing the plane grazed the top of the building. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72541933 No. Witness near the Citgo service station saw a commercial jet (not necessarily carrying passengers, of course) fly low OVER the Pentagon towards Ronald Regan Airport. It could not have carried bombs or fired missiles and I think it was meant to be a distraction for the actual missile that hit the Pentagon at almost the same time. It was flying in a path south of Citgo, whereas the path of Flight 77 was supposed to be north of the Citgo. The path of damage inside the Pentagon proves that the flight path of the missile as it hit was north of the Citgo and so the plane could not have fired a missile or dropped a bomb causing this damage. This is what I saw witnesses say years ago. That it flew OVER the Pentagon and on a low trajectory right to Reagan Nat'l Airport behind it so it landed. It was meant as a distraction because of the location in proximity to the barracks, Arlington Cemetery, the Interstate and other highways it takes a whole different ruse to fool the public there that a hijacked plane crashed there than what it took to fool the public they crashed in the towers and Pennsylvania. NO planes crashed that day, at all. Not at the Pentagon, not in Shanksville, and definitely not in Manhattan among valuable real estate. That of course was via professional planned demolitions. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78146613 Belgium 05/04/2020 08:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So a plane was carrying a missile and at a very low altitude near the Pentagon dropped it and flew over the Pentagon as the missile hit. That fireball probably distracted eye witnesses from realizing the plane grazed the top of the building. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72541933 No. Witness near the Citgo service station saw a commercial jet (not necessarily carrying passengers, of course) fly low OVER the Pentagon towards Ronald Regan Airport. It could not have carried bombs or fired missiles and I think it was meant to be a distraction for the actual missile that hit the Pentagon at almost the same time. It was flying in a path south of Citgo, whereas the path of Flight 77 was supposed to be north of the Citgo. The path of damage inside the Pentagon proves that the flight path of the missile as it hit was north of the Citgo and so the plane could not have fired a missile or dropped a bomb causing this damage. This is what I saw witnesses say years ago. That it flew OVER the Pentagon and on a low trajectory right to Reagan Nat'l Airport behind it so it landed. It was meant as a distraction because of the location in proximity to the barracks, Arlington Cemetery, the Interstate and other highways it takes a whole different ruse to fool the public there that a hijacked plane crashed there than what it took to fool the public they crashed in the towers and Pennsylvania. NO planes crashed that day, at all. Not at the Pentagon, not in Shanksville, and definitely not in Manhattan among valuable real estate. That of course was via professional planned demolitions. What flew in the WTC towers then?? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78785509 United States 05/04/2020 08:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So a plane was carrying a missile and at a very low altitude near the Pentagon dropped it and flew over the Pentagon as the missile hit. That fireball probably distracted eye witnesses from realizing the plane grazed the top of the building. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72541933 No. Witness near the Citgo service station saw a commercial jet (not necessarily carrying passengers, of course) fly low OVER the Pentagon towards Ronald Regan Airport. It could not have carried bombs or fired missiles and I think it was meant to be a distraction for the actual missile that hit the Pentagon at almost the same time. It was flying in a path south of Citgo, whereas the path of Flight 77 was supposed to be north of the Citgo. The path of damage inside the Pentagon proves that the flight path of the missile as it hit was north of the Citgo and so the plane could not have fired a missile or dropped a bomb causing this damage. This is what I saw witnesses say years ago. That it flew OVER the Pentagon and on a low trajectory right to Reagan Nat'l Airport behind it so it landed. It was meant as a distraction because of the location in proximity to the barracks, Arlington Cemetery, the Interstate and other highways it takes a whole different ruse to fool the public there that a hijacked plane crashed there than what it took to fool the public they crashed in the towers and Pennsylvania. NO planes crashed that day, at all. Not at the Pentagon, not in Shanksville, and definitely not in Manhattan among valuable real estate. That of course was via professional planned demolitions. What flew in the WTC towers then?? Nothing. As many street witnesses early on stated. They saw and heard NO plane, it just exploded out the side, as false proof that it occurred. That's for people who were there. For people home watching on their TV, they saw a pre-packaged CGI video of a plane that cgi'd into the building. As people saw this footage over and over and over, this became their "truth". |