Well, without insuring clarity, you've implied that Israel would be "outgunned". Would they, and if so, based upon what information?

It's a simple question. Offering fallacious arguments with which you attempt to compare apples with oranges doesn't truly satisfy the request.

In other words, shotguns, 22's, police depts, France, England, Italy, and China are all extraneous.

Is it possible to focus on the theory that Israel could attack Iran and/or Syria by way of northern Kurdistan and explore the viability of said engagement -- offering verifiable sources of information as support for ones assertions?


You can if you want, in the end I'm quite sure you will come to the same conclusion..

"Israel can attack, but it cannot win. If Israel is stupid enough to attack Iran or Syria, It will burn. Stupid thread. What's wrong with you??"