Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,066 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 198,339
Pageviews Today: 305,895Threads Today: 124Posts Today: 1,717
03:24 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

House Judiciary member, Charles Rangel - "Investigate whether Bush intentionally misled U.S. for war.."

 
Pollyannuh
Offer Upgrade

06/16/2005 11:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
House Judiciary member, Charles Rangel - "Investigate whether Bush intentionally misled U.S. for war.."
[link to www.msnbc.msn.com]
Rangel: Investigate whether Bush intentionally misled U.S. for war
Democrat wants information in wake of British memos saying Iraq invasion was president’s goal

The Associated Press
Updated: 7:13 p.m. ET June 16, 2005


WASHINGTON - Congress should conduct an official inquiry to determine whether President Bush intentionally misled the nation about the reasons for toppling Saddam Hussein, a senior House Democrat suggested Thursday.

New York Rep. Charles Rangel was among Democratic House members who participated in a forum to air demands that the White House provide more information about what led to the decision to go to war in Iraq.

"Quite frankly, evidence that appears to be building up points to whether or not the president has deliberately misled Congress to make the most important decision a president has to make, going to war," said Rangel, senior Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee.

Rep. John Conyers and other Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee organized the forum to investigate implications in a British document known as the "Downing Street memo." The memo says the Bush administration believed that war was inevitable and was determined to use intelligence about weapons of mass destruction to justify the ouster of Saddam.

Conyers pointed to statements by Bush in the run-up to invasion that war would be a last resort. "The veracity of those statements has — to put it mildly — come into question," he said.

Ruing lack of debate
In the opening hours of the forum, witnesses spoke mainly about their views on the decision to go to war and not the memo, which the Bush administration has dismissed.

"We are having this discussion today because we failed to have it three years ago when we went to war," former Ambassador Joseph Wilson said.

"It used to be said that democracies were difficult to mobilize for war precisely because of the debate required," Wilson said, going on to say the lack of debate in this case allowed the war to happen.


Wilson wrote a 2003 newspaper opinion piece criticizing the Bush administration´s claim that Iraq had sought uranium in Niger. After the piece appeared someone in the Bush administration leaked the identity of Wilson´s wife as a CIA operative, exposing her cover.

Wilson has said he believes the leak was retaliation for his critical comments. The Justice Department is investigating.

Last Edited by theDtrain on 09/20/2011 04:11 PM
Anonymous Coward
12/08/2005 10:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: House Judiciary member, Charles Rangel - "Investigate whether Bush intentionally misled U.S. for war.."
´The House´ doesn´t seem to think this investigation should interfere with financing..,

>House Poised to Give Pentagon $45 Billion More for Wars
[link to ap.tbo.com]
Anonymous Coward
12/08/2005 10:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: House Judiciary member, Charles Rangel - "Investigate whether Bush intentionally misled U.S. for war.."
i simply cant help them anymore -- they´ll just have to move out and pay for their own war
Anonymous Coward
12/08/2005 10:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: House Judiciary member, Charles Rangel - "Investigate whether Bush intentionally misled U.S. for war.."
Heavy words from Rangel who has been through two impeachments, Nixon and Clinton.
TEOTWAWKI  (OP)

12/08/2005 10:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: House Judiciary member, Charles Rangel - "Investigate whether Bush intentionally misled U.S. for war.."
I wish they would learn that "misled" is not a
synonym for "lied". Have some guts, he LIED!
Anonymous Coward
12/08/2005 10:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: House Judiciary member, Charles Rangel - "Investigate whether Bush intentionally misled U.S. for war.."
House Judiciary Committee meeting Democrats on CSPAN 6/16/05

[link to www.c-span.org]
Anonymous Coward
12/08/2005 10:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: House Judiciary member, Charles Rangel - "Investigate whether Bush intentionally misled U.S. for war.."
Monomania

[link to dictionary.reference.com]

Word of the Day for Friday July 12, 2002

monomania mon-uh-MAY-nee-uh; -nyuh, noun:
1. Pathological obsession with a single subject or idea.
2. Excessive concentration of interest upon one particular subject or idea.
Pollyannuh  (OP)

12/08/2005 10:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: House Judiciary member, Charles Rangel - "Investigate whether Bush intentionally misled U.S. for war.."
How is it, and why is it, that Republicans choose to use special ops tools such as derision, ridicule, and insults rather than examine charges bought against a failed Republican administration?

Have you lost all your individuality?
Anonymous Coward
12/08/2005 10:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: House Judiciary member, Charles Rangel - "Investigate whether Bush intentionally misled U.S. for war.."
[link to www.insightmag.com]

ok...this is really getting weird....on the heels of this meeting about the downing street memo´s....this comes on what really happened .com.....
did I miss this article or is this real?
this article is dated april of 2004......is something amiss here...someone help me with this?
slightly retarded republican  (OP)

12/08/2005 10:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: House Judiciary member, Charles Rangel - "Investigate whether Bush intentionally misled U.S. for war.."
When I´m caught in a lie I stand there and stammer and smirk.





GLP