Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,943 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 376,514
Pageviews Today: 786,090Threads Today: 428Posts Today: 8,989
02:03 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Were ‘Mini-Nukes’ Used to Bring Down WTC?

 
DreamTheater
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 978506
United States
09/20/2010 09:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Were ‘Mini-Nukes’ Used to Bring Down WTC?
Could New York City’s World Trade Center (WTC) have actually been nuked on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001? The possibility of such a scenario arose during this writer’s Aug. 23 interview with aerospace and chemical engineer T. Mark Hightower. As a member and petition signer of
Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth, Hightower has studied the works of military explosives experts, investigators from Finland, the UK and Russia, along with various physicists, both named and anonymous.

While not claiming to have all the definitive answers, Hightower also doesn’t fall into the category of researchers who stake out unbending “either-or” claims and refuse to budge. Rather, he remains open-minded to new developments and their analysis.

Utilizing this approach, he shared his best evidence for the use of miniature nuclear devices inside the WTC’s twin towers. From Hightower’s perspective, high-tech explosives known as nano-thermites and more conventional explosives could well have been used in conjunction with an even more lethal energy source to produce not only a controlled demolition, but also a veritable “China Syndrome” directly in the heart of lower Manhattan.

Hightower explained the phenomenon, which would have been similar to the Chernobyl meltdown. “If nukes were used to disintegrate the World Trade Center’s immense inner core, only a small percentage actually reacted when these devices were detonated. The leftover materials subsequently continued to react, and therefore kept producing tremendous amounts of heat. This continual source of energy explains the molten steel discovered beneath ground level weeks after 9-11.”

READ MORE: [link to www.americanfreepress.net]

Not Copyrighted. Readers can reprint and are free to redistribute - as long as full credit is given to American Free Press - 645 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, Suite 100 Washington, D.C. 20003
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[link to www.MorichesDaily.com]

Twitter: [link to twitter.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 991584
United States
09/20/2010 10:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were ‘Mini-Nukes’ Used to Bring Down WTC?
Yes

G. House

User ID: 1104929
United States
09/20/2010 10:35 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were ‘Mini-Nukes’ Used to Bring Down WTC?
No!
"Everybody lies."
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 992859
United States
09/20/2010 10:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were ‘Mini-Nukes’ Used to Bring Down WTC?
No!
 Quoting: G. House

lol
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1098546
United States
09/20/2010 10:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were ‘Mini-Nukes’ Used to Bring Down WTC?
No, standard cutter charges, with the thermite to more effectively burn up any collectible evidence.

The micro nuke was used in the WTC event of 1993. Look for images. The lower levels of the parking deck were melted.
Prof_Rabbit

User ID: 1105015
Australia
09/20/2010 11:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were ‘Mini-Nukes’ Used to Bring Down WTC?
Hightower has studied the works of military explosives experts, investigators from Finland, the UK and Russia, along with various physicists, both named and anonymous.
 Quoting: DreamTheater


Quite simply - not likely -

If you want to hide something in the ground from prying eyes and metal detectors you spread other pieces of metal around to fool those searching.

Same goes for 9/11, micro nukes, no planes and all the other fantastic sci-fi stories are there to confuse and confound.

There WAS enough time to wire the building(s) - military explosives ARE good enough to do the job - Thermate or a military equivalent WAS found as a residue -

A 757 does NOT disappear under ground like a bullet.

There are no holes in the wall of the Pentagon where the engines should have impacted.

These are self evident, but you will never peel back enough layers to find the real truth.
"Anger is a wind that blows out the lamp of your mind"
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1093887
United Kingdom
09/21/2010 02:35 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were ‘Mini-Nukes’ Used to Bring Down WTC?
search term "thermobaric weapon" aka bunker buster

:)

for me the NUKE theory 'falls down' when you start to WATCH how the towers came down... top down explosions throwing out loads of massive debris, not a top heavy object ploughing through dustified majority of building.

Gah, it doesn't even matter!!!!!!!

Three buildings were demolished on that insane day of reckoning for Corporate War finance, they didn't fall because some planes hit them - nothing even hit the third building(!)

THAT'S THE IMPORTANT THING
Free Fall Speed
User ID: 1071501
United States
09/21/2010 02:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were ‘Mini-Nukes’ Used to Bring Down WTC?
Directed Energy Weapons DEW

Why didn't the millions of pieces of paper burn??

The spaced based lasers weren't "tuned" for paper

Their frequencies were tuned for concrete and steel

Pure Pulverization!!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 973795
United States
09/21/2010 02:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were ‘Mini-Nukes’ Used to Bring Down WTC?
I don't think there is any such thing as a "mini-nuke"... That would mean you would have to split a "Mini-atom"... And I don't think that their is any such thing as a "mini-atom".
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1105157
United States
09/21/2010 02:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were ‘Mini-Nukes’ Used to Bring Down WTC?
Has anyone ever used a Geiger counter at ground zero? Just wondering is all.





GLP