Muslim Nations Call for U.N. to Track ‘Islamophobia’

One day the false charge of Islamaphobia will be as meaningless as the equally absurd "anti semitism".

One day the false charge of Islamaphobia will be as meaningless as the equally absurd "anti semitism".


Wow, you have me in your sig line? Wow...

One day the false charge of Islamaphobia will be as meaningless as the equally absurd "anti semitism".


Wow, you have me in your sig line? Wow...





You're worth quoting!

Nathan Explosion FTW.

They won't be happy until they call the whole world a Mosque.

Greedy people.

They won't be happy until they call the whole world a Mosque.

Greedy people.


Try as they might, not gonna happen. I don't necessarily agree with other religions, BUT I would never want to kill anyone because they didn't agree with me, or didn't convert.

I truly believe that the GOD I believe in gave us all FREEWILL. Nothing should be by force! PERIOD!!!

They won't be happy until they call the whole world a Mosque.

Greedy people.


Try as they might, not gonna happen. I don't necessarily agree with other religions, BUT I would never want to kill anyone because they didn't agree with me, or didn't convert.

I truly believe that the GOD I believe in gave us all FREEWILL. Nothing should be by force! PERIOD!!!

Islamophobia, what exactly is that? Fear of Muslims?

Perhaps the Muslims are the ones who are in fear. Does not sound correct and the UN is corrupt anyhow and some of them know this and let them continue on as such.

Islamophobia, what exactly is that? Fear of Muslims?

Perhaps the Muslims are the ones who are in fear. Does not sound correct and the UN is corrupt anyhow and some of them know this and let them continue on as such.

Kafiraphobia

U.N. Human Rights Commissioner Navanethem Pillay has agreed to consider the proposal, according to the OIC, a bloc of Islamic nations.


(CNSNews.com) – The Quran-burning controversy in the United States has prompted the Islamic bloc at the United Nations to revive its call for the U.N. to set up an “international monitoring mechanism” to track incidents of “Islamophobia.”

Five years after establishing an “Islamophobia Observatory” of its own, the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) is now calling on the U.N.’s top human rights official to set up a comparable body at her Geneva office. According to the OIC, human rights commissioner Navanethem Pillay has agreed to consider the proposal.

At the U.N. Human Rights Council this week, OIC members are also seeking support for a resolution condemning Florida pastor Terry Jones’ abortive call to burn copies of the Quran on September 11.

Introduced by Pakistan on behalf of the OIC, the text condemns “the recent call by an extremist group to organize a ‘Burn a Koran Day’” and says it was among “instances of intolerance, discrimination, profiling and acts of violence against Muslims occurring in many parts of the world.”

When it comes to a vote -- before the Council’s session in Geneva ends next Friday -- the measure almost certainly will pass. The OIC controls more than one-third of the Council’s seats, and its resolutions are routinely backed by non-Muslim allies such as China, Russia, Cuba and South Africa.

Moreover, Western democracies which usually oppose OIC “Islamophobia” and “religious defamation” measures at the HRC – on freedom of expression grounds – will not likely do so in this case, having strongly condemned Jones’ threats earlier this month.

Continued: [link to cnsnews.com]

we aren't afraid of the muslims its the bombs they strap on and walk into crowds we aren't too fond of.

we aren't afraid of the muslims its the bombs they strap on and walk into crowds we aren't too fond of.

we aren't afraid of the muslims its the bombs they strap on and walk into crowds we aren't too fond of.


That's interesting because they hate having their women and children bombed, having their countries occupied, and having their oil stolen.

I guess you have more in common than you think.

we aren't afraid of the muslims its the bombs they strap on and walk into crowds we aren't too fond of.


That's interesting because they hate having their women and children bombed, having their countries occupied, and having their oil stolen.

I guess you have more in common than you think.


What respect do the RADICALS have for their women?

Egyptian Cleric Sa'd Arafat: Islam Permits Wife Beating Only When She Refuses to Have Sex with Her Husband

Interviewer: Would you believe that the European women in our times yearns for a husband who would be like a guardian to her. I would like to provide the viewers with some statistics. Ninety percent of British women do not want to marry a weak man, who sits down and cries the moment there is a problem. They say: No, such a man looks more like a woman. We want a manly man.

Wife beating is a serious accusation [leveled against Islam]. Let us examine this matter bit by bit.

Sa'd Arafat: Allah honored wives by instating the punishment of beatings.

Interviewer: Honored them with beatings? How is this possible?!

Sa'd Arafat: The prophet Muhammad said: "Don't beat her in the face, and do not make her ugly." See how she is honored. If the husband beats his wife, he must not beat her in the face. Even when he beats her, he must not curse her. This is incredible! He beats her in order to discipline her.

In addition, there must not be more than ten beatings, and he must not break her bones, injure her, break her teeth, or poke her in the eye. There is a beating etiquette. If he beats to discipline her, he must not raise his hand high. He must beat her from chest level. All these things honor the woman.

She is in need of discipline. How should the husband discipline her? Through admonishment. If she is not deterred, he should refuse to share the bed with her. If she is not repentant, he should beat her, but there are rules to the beating. It is forbidden to beat her in the face or make her ugly. When you beat her, you must not curse her. Islam forbids this.

Interviewer: With what should be beat her? With his bare hand? With a rod?

Sa'd Arafat: If he beats her, the beatings should not be hard, so that they do not leave a mark. He can beat her with a short rod. He must avoid beating her in the face or in places in the head where it hurts. The beatings should be on the body and should not come one right after the other. These are all choices made during the process, but beatings are allowed only as a last resort.

The honoring of the wife in Islam is also evident in the fact that the punishment of beating is permissible in one case only: when she refuses to sleep with him.

Interviewer: When she refuses to sleep with him?

Sa'd Arafat: Yes, because where else could the husband go? He wants her, but she refuses. He should begin with admonishment and threats...

Interviewer: Allow me to repeat this. A man cannot beat his wife...

Interviewer: ...over food or drink. Beatings are permitted only in this case, which the husband cannot do without.

And your country justified the murder of 3,000,000 people for oil.

You have the highest incident of rape and pedofilia in the world, and the highest prison population.

Don't say it's not embeded in your own culture, because CLEARLY it is.

Take a look in the mirror before you judge others.

Well, if a portion of the Muslim population (of over a billion) are stone age brutes, then it follows that all Mulsims should be collectively punished for the few. The same must apply for Jews, too. A fair percentage of Jews are con artists and criminals, so anhilate them all, right?