What do homosexuals raising children teach them about Sexual Morality?

They can not be, end of story.

what the fuck is sexual morality?

Apparently so......

Not having sex with your pet,family members, children, multiple people,engaging in deviant sexual acts, sodomy
Adultery, fornication for pleasure only, orgies, swingers
prostitutes....

Homosexual views on those issues...

THEY SAY ALL THESE SCRIPTURES ARE IN_CORRECT IN THE BIBLE AND MIS-INTERPETED...


1 Cor 6:9-10

9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,

10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. (KJV)

To help you understand better, I'll give the definitions for the words in the above passage that relate to this topic.


A fornicator is one who indulges in unlawful sexual intercourse. (Incase you are wondering what unlawful sexual intercourse means, it refers to Lev 18)


An adulterer is one who being married, has sexual intercourse with someone other than their spouse.


Effeminate is a boy kept for homosexual relations with a man or a male who submits his body to unnatural lewdness.


An abuser of themself with mankind is one who lies with a male as with a female, sodomite, homosexual.


1 Cor 5:1-13

1 It is reported commonly that there is fornication among you, and such fornication as is not so much as named among the Gentiles, that one should have his father's wife.

2 And ye are puffed up, and have not rather mourned, that he that hath done this deed might be taken away from among you.

3 For I verily, as absent in body, but present in spirit, have judged already, as though I were present, concerning him that hath so done this deed,

4 In the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, when ye are gathered together, and my spirit, with the power of our Lord Jesus Christ,

5 To deliver such an one unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus.

6 Your glorying is not good. Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump?

7 Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened. For even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us:

8 Therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness; but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth.

9 I wrote unto you in an epistle not to company with fornicators:

10 Yet not altogether with the fornicators of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or with idolaters; for then must ye needs go out of the world.

11 But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat.

12 For what have I to do to judge them also that are without? do not ye judge them that are within?

13 But them that are without God judgeth. Therefore put away from among yourselves that wicked person. (KJV)

In this chapter we find that sexual immorality had taken place in the church. Note that Paul had judged this person, that's right, he judged this person. We are called to judge. To learn more about judging read my article "Judge Not". Paul said that this person should be "delivered unto Satan" or even that the "wicked person should be cast out from among them." Very strong words indeed! What Paul was talking about was excluding this man from fellowship that he would be left alone with his sin and Satan, and hopefully this emptiness would drive him to repentance.

God certainly does not approve of homosexuality, so why are churches today going against the Word of God in respect to "gays?" Think about this:

Rom 1:32

32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them. (KJV)

What was Paul referring to in this verse? He was referring to a number of things, one of which is homosexuality:

Romans 1:26-27

26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. (KJV)

Only Christians are dumb enough to ask these sort of questions.

"Nothing is 'wrong'"

"It is OK to try everything once"

and the all-impt, apostate

"DOOOOOON'T JUUUUDGE!!"

being attracted to a member of the same sex has nothing to do with incest, bestiality, pedophilia, polygamy, sexual deviancy, sodomy, adultery, fornication for pleasure only, orgies, swingers and prostitutes.
and 'sexual' has nothing to do with 'morality'... if you want to believe it does that's your prerogative, but sexuality is what it is. heterosexual people engage in deviant behavior just as much as homosexual people do. if you molest children, you do it because you have an impulse that you cannot control, not because of your sexual gender preferences.

fucking hogwash.

Preach it, Suie!

Johnathan and David. Gay lovers. Open your eyes, forget everything that the priests and ministers told you to interpret the story as, apply what you know of life. The conclusion is that John and Dave are well gay.

Ruth and Naomi - Lesbians. Slice it anyway you want, once you take off the blinders of 'official interpretation' and really read it yourself and compare your life experiences to the story(s) it becomes clear that these people were ---- gay.

The Admonishments against homosexuality are not really against 'gays'. They are against straight people performing 'gay' acts.

When we start throwing in history and put the verses back into context, we start to see that the abomination is temple prostitution, not homosexuality.

The Pre-Romanized Christians understood the difference, so much so that same gendered marriages took place. So put off by that notion, modern Churches are quick to deny, ridicule and tell us that these were not 'real' Christian sects each and every time the evidence is put forth.

Historically the 'gays' have been a great scape goat, after we have finished programing people to believe that sex is bad, it becomes much easier to program them to believe that gays are even worse than bad.

Homosexuality is only the tip of the iceberg, Attend seminary for a few years, they admit in class that translation and interpretation has been done in such a manner as to preclude non-traditional thinking.

Its drug use - not sorceries or 'witchcraft' that is condemned. It is idol worship and temple sex that is forbidden, not homosexuality. The sins of Sodom was not homosexuality, it was that they raped visitors and had no hospitality what so ever.

Yet no matter what is pointed out and produced as evidence, circular 'Doctrine' Logic is produced.

There were (past tense) over 600 books accepted by early Pre Romanized christian Sects. Many of those books allowed for same sex 'love' (what we call homosexuality) and even blessed unions of same gendered mates. All of those 'books' were decried, unaccepted and a very thin shadow of books remain that promote the mass control that the Early Church wanted, the same mass control that modern Churches use to cause fear in the believer to the believer lock steps in time and pays their "love gifts" and gives lip service to God.

BTW the Revelation telling of the False Religion is speaking of the False Christian Religion which is practiced by nearly 1/3rd of the world's population today.

Hey mods - since you are deleting all of teh gay threads - delete this one too....I am offended.

That is fine if you are talking to someone besides your child. Obviously, you don't have any.

good parenting!

one cant be gay and ethical?????

what is it like to have such small minds?????

"Do unto others as you would have others do unto you."
The Golden Rule, of course.

gay . straight, republicrats, divide and conquer old story, kind of like homophobes fantasizing of smoking cock.

I am not gay, but if I were I would tell them the same thing I tell mine. "Don't spread it or stick it until you can afford the CONSEQUENCES." End of discussion.

My partner and I raised my now 23 year old daughter. We taught her about sex, about how powerful the feelings were, and how nearly incomprehensible they could be for a young person. We taught her that sex was something her body might be capable of at 12 or 13 but that her mind and soul were not ready for until far later in life. We advised her STRONGLY to abstain from sexual encounters of any type until she was at least in college. HOWEVER, we were also practical enough to understand that in case she chose to become sexually active before that time, we didn't want her to be a victim of sexually transmitted diseases, or an unwanted and unplanned pregnancy. So we taught her about birth control in depth. She knew about condoms, how to use them properly, and even down to using a fresh one for multiple acts of intercourse with the same partner. She knew how to lubricate the inside of the condom at the tip to prevent breakage and she knew how to apply one to her male partner. She also knew about the "morning after" pill and it's dangers. She knew about birth control pills and that they were not and are not foolproof. We taught her about the consequences of STD's and what the various symptoms of them looked like in both male and female persons.

She came to me when she was about 16 and complained of cramps and a difficult time with her periods. She said it had always been rough but was getting worse. I made an appointment for her with a young, female OB/GYN. She had a complete exam and the doc recommended a mild Birth Control pill to regulate and smooth out her menstrual cycles. They worked. She was also aware that she could not stay on them indefinitely. She also knew she had to be checked annually while on the pills. This was nothing more than standard medical care as far as we were concerned.

By the time she was about 17, she met a young man and thought she was 'in love' with him. And she had sex with him. Oddly enough he was as inexperienced as she was and she didn't like it much. When they broke up a few weeks later, she was upset and swore off men and stayed off them for about three years. By the time she was 20 she met another guy and I'm fairly certain they had a sexual relationship. She ended up dumping him because (in her words) he was a looser who would never do anything with his life except smoke dope and look for the next piece of ass!)

Today she's in grad school. She has a steady "bf" but admits he's not the "ONE" but he's convenient for now. They're friends with a little more thrown in because this is not the time for her to be making life long commitments and she knows it.

This winter she'll graduate early and has several great job offers from top firms in NYC and SF. She's leaning toward NYC because of her love of the city. When she moves there, I think we'll sell the house and buy her an apartment there and a small one for ourselves to be near her part of the time.

Morally, she's a decent kid. Did she grow up to be celibate? No. But she's been decent and honest with herself, and with the boys she's been involved with. She's a clear headed young woman with a fairly modest sexual history for her age. I am very proud of her having avoided the obvious pitfalls of growing up today (sex, pregnancy, drugs, etc.)

She's often said that having two dads has taught her more about men than most of her peers dream possible. She says she understands men because of us. I think she may have a point.

Committed and loving relationships speak volumes past deceitful and contempt ones.

Some of the most well adjusted and graceful young people I know have a homosexual parent or two homosexual parents.

I taught my children not to be afraid of who they are sexually and be honest about it and their mother is a RN gave them a good education on sex. my oldest daughter is 16 and still celibate ... well she says she is like many 16 year old girls, however she is always amazingly honest with me and give how wild I was when I was her age I am shocked.

Congratulations, you raised a stereotypical american female whore. Pat yourself on the back.

Your own words here "Today she's in grad school. She has a steady "bf" but admits he's not the "ONE" but he's convenient for now."

fugggg-it

Easy. Stick it in the first hole they see.