Contract makes law!! It is a maximum of law!

You can make ANY "legal tender" "lawful money" as a medium of exchange for that contract.

That does not mean any legal tender is "lawful money" on its own.

It really is simple but some try to expand and twist the wording if the Rickman case to mean FRNs are no longer redeemable in lawful money because FRNs are included in federal definitions of "legal tender".

Do not be sucked into that outright LIE. The other case agreed the defendant "had the right to redeem his note"...

But not on gold or silver!!

It's all about offer and acceptance, there is no definition of standing US law that recognizes FRNs as "lawful money" as issued. Only AFTER the assumed or presumed endorsement of the living man or woman via contractual agreement do FRNs become a form of lawful.

Keep your eyes open, there is a viper on the loose.