Reporting the same shit over and over does not make it true, AGENT. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 40017194
Laughing...so now I'm an 'agent'. Anyone who doesn't ape your conspiracy must be part of it, eh?
And I'm simply quoting the cases.
Appellant has filed a substantial brief and an adequate reply brief and has argued his full share of allotted time in support for a demand that his $50.00 Federal Reserve Bank Note be redeemed in "lawful money" of the United States, which he says, in effect, must be gold or silver. Appellant refused appellees' tender of an equivalent value in Federal Reserve Notes. Quoting: Milam v. US
Milam demanded redemption of FRNs under Title 12 USC 4121. He got FRNs.
You say 'uh-uh'. The court says differently.
Defendant received Federal Reserve Notes when he cashed his pay checks and used those notes to pay his personal expenses. He obtained and used lawful money. Quoting: US. V. Rickman
FRNs are lawful money. You say 'uh-uh'. The courts say differently. Twice.
The world doesn't disappear just because you close your eyes, sunshine.
And in the meantime you've fled *every* time I've asked you to show me the law or court case that says that FRNs must be redeemed in US notes.....you flee.
Everytime I've asked you to show us the law or court cases that says
Get paid by the word or by the post, SHILL? Quoting:
Laughing...I debunk your nonsense for free, my friend. The only one selling something here is you....shilling your website, trying to drive up webtraffic in your latest 'too-good-to-be-true' tax con.
And oh, the bitterness you spew when called on your con.