Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 6431462 United States 12/17/2011 08:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So bottom line or me at this moment. I have always felt as though I was programmed or wired this way coming in to this world. Liking remote but in different form. Thus nothing had to be learned this time around to access that technique in times of need, leading me further to process that it very well could not just be an intuitive but instinctual state for the species. Quoting: A Muse Me That makes sense. I think as we collectively enlighten we'll exercise it more when working with others helping them find center state. It is odd being both supplicant and subject though and most humans aren't prepared for that experience instinctual or not. Big leap to see ones own creature in this society. |
A Muse Me User ID: 1492096 United States 12/17/2011 08:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So bottom line or me at this moment. I have always felt as though I was programmed or wired this way coming in to this world. Liking remote but in different form. Thus nothing had to be learned this time around to access that technique in times of need, leading me further to process that it very well could not just be an intuitive but instinctual state for the species. Quoting: A Muse Me That makes sense. I think as we collectively enlighten we'll exercise it more when working with others helping them find center state. It is odd being both supplicant and subject though and most humans aren't prepared for that experience instinctual or not. Big leap to see ones own creature in this society. Who is this we or we’ll in which you speak? I’m not in touch with what a ‘we’ will do. Not that I really care who this we is, but more interested in what does “we” mean to you. The term derives from the Ancient Greek words, meta, meaning beyond or after, and noia, meaning perception or understanding or mind. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 6431462 United States 12/17/2011 08:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So bottom line or me at this moment. I have always felt as though I was programmed or wired this way coming in to this world. Liking remote but in different form. Thus nothing had to be learned this time around to access that technique in times of need, leading me further to process that it very well could not just be an intuitive but instinctual state for the species. Quoting: A Muse Me That makes sense. I think as we collectively enlighten we'll exercise it more when working with others helping them find center state. It is odd being both supplicant and subject though and most humans aren't prepared for that experience instinctual or not. Big leap to see ones own creature in this society. Who is this we or we’ll in which you speak? I’m not in touch with what a ‘we’ will do. Not that I really care who this we is, but more interested in what does “we” mean to you. "we" to me is the group of enlightened souls that carry common resonance. It's hard to describe but my worldview is such that those who have common concept overlap at points of resonance based on those concepts. I have a fairly evolved understanding of the consciousness structure in the multiverse and understand souls, both living and non-material use these points of resonance to inter-communicate and gather about. So when I refer to a 'we' it is the collective that is formed by the sentiences co-resonating. I'm fortunate in that I'm fully awakened and know my over soul has multiple human representations so I could also refer to we as me and my alters. |
A Muse Me User ID: 1492096 United States 12/17/2011 08:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes, ‘we' and ‘they' can often sound like voices in ‘one’s’ head when not in a center state, so perhaps best to define up front when speaking of ‘other’s’ psyche or the collective’s wiring. But then again I don’t delve into thoughts of re-wiring. That is ritual imo whether that be religious or bio or metaphysical context. The term derives from the Ancient Greek words, meta, meaning beyond or after, and noia, meaning perception or understanding or mind. |
aether User ID: 1412926 United Kingdom 12/17/2011 08:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "we" to me is the group of enlightened souls that carry common resonance. It's hard to describe but my worldview is such that those who have common concept overlap at points of resonance based on those concepts. I have a fairly evolved understanding of the consciousness structure in the multiverse and understand souls, both living and non-material use these points of resonance to inter-communicate and gather about. So when I refer to a 'we' it is the collective that is formed by the sentiences co-resonating. Quoting: acI'm fortunate in that I'm fully awakened and know my over soul has multiple human representations so I could also refer to we as me and my alters. archetype |
A Muse Me User ID: 1492096 United States 12/17/2011 08:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 6431462 United States 12/17/2011 08:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes, ‘we' and ‘they' can often sound like voices in ‘one’s’ head when not in a center state, so perhaps best to define up front when speaking of ‘other’s’ psyche or the collective’s wiring. But then again I don’t delve into thoughts of re-wiring. That is ritual imo whether that be religious or bio or metaphysical context. Quoting: A Muse Me Yeah - I asked for the rewiring and participated to prevent infinite loops in my own consciousness as a byproduct of this lives experience. I think we can all consciously repair when the need arises - and the others simply 'help' because some of these things are best modified non-materially. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 6431462 United States 12/17/2011 08:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "we" to me is the group of enlightened souls that carry common resonance. It's hard to describe but my worldview is such that those who have common concept overlap at points of resonance based on those concepts. I have a fairly evolved understanding of the consciousness structure in the multiverse and understand souls, both living and non-material use these points of resonance to inter-communicate and gather about. So when I refer to a 'we' it is the collective that is formed by the sentiences co-resonating. Quoting: acI'm fortunate in that I'm fully awakened and know my over soul has multiple human representations so I could also refer to we as me and my alters. archetype Yep...much better word. So the question is what is my base archetype? |
aether User ID: 1412926 United Kingdom 12/17/2011 08:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1037270 United States 12/17/2011 08:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I call them other me's. It seems more descriptive than someone else's definition. There's other me's in the here/now, not alters because that implies they don't know each other and are controlled. There's other me's in the bubble of the past, then there's the higher me who seems to pull it all together and point where I should look without screaming at me to do it. All in all, all of me is libertarian, a proponent of freewill and pretty much a trickster shaman. And whether I say it or not, there's not an ounce of bitterness in me, just compassion and mad love. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1037270 United States 12/17/2011 08:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "we" to me is the group of enlightened souls that carry common resonance. It's hard to describe but my worldview is such that those who have common concept overlap at points of resonance based on those concepts. I have a fairly evolved understanding of the consciousness structure in the multiverse and understand souls, both living and non-material use these points of resonance to inter-communicate and gather about. So when I refer to a 'we' it is the collective that is formed by the sentiences co-resonating. Quoting: acI'm fortunate in that I'm fully awakened and know my over soul has multiple human representations so I could also refer to we as me and my alters. archetype Yep...much better word. So the question is what is my base archetype? Mine's Trickster Shaman Healer, hehe... gets me in loads of trouble, but that's ok... it's as fun to get out of as it is to get into. |
A Muse Me User ID: 1492096 United States 12/17/2011 08:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I call them other me's. It seems more descriptive than someone else's definition. There's other me's in the here/now, not alters because that implies they don't know each other and are controlled. There's other me's in the bubble of the past, then there's the higher me who seems to pull it all together and point where I should look without screaming at me to do it. All in all, all of me is libertarian, a proponent of freewill and pretty much a trickster shaman. And whether I say it or not, there's not an ounce of bitterness in me, just compassion and mad love. Quoting: Miss Portinari The term derives from the Ancient Greek words, meta, meaning beyond or after, and noia, meaning perception or understanding or mind. |
aether User ID: 1412926 United Kingdom 12/17/2011 09:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "we" to me is the group of enlightened souls that carry common resonance. It's hard to describe but my worldview is such that those who have common concept overlap at points of resonance based on those concepts. I have a fairly evolved understanding of the consciousness structure in the multiverse and understand souls, both living and non-material use these points of resonance to inter-communicate and gather about. So when I refer to a 'we' it is the collective that is formed by the sentiences co-resonating. Quoting: acI'm fortunate in that I'm fully awakened and know my over soul has multiple human representations so I could also refer to we as me and my alters. archetype Yep...much better word. So the question is what is my base archetype? Mine's Trickster Shaman Healer, hehe... gets me in loads of trouble, but that's ok... it's as fun to get out of as it is to get into. you that and you would know , my experience of you is you reflect what you meet in a manner that fits you which i just realized describes me that i did not expect at the beginning of that initial short sentence am i describing only me? |
A Muse Me User ID: 1492096 United States 12/17/2011 09:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 6431462 United States 12/17/2011 09:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 6431462 United States 12/17/2011 09:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "we" to me is the group of enlightened souls that carry common resonance. It's hard to describe but my worldview is such that those who have common concept overlap at points of resonance based on those concepts. I have a fairly evolved understanding of the consciousness structure in the multiverse and understand souls, both living and non-material use these points of resonance to inter-communicate and gather about. So when I refer to a 'we' it is the collective that is formed by the sentiences co-resonating. Quoting: acI'm fortunate in that I'm fully awakened and know my over soul has multiple human representations so I could also refer to we as me and my alters. archetype Yep...much better word. So the question is what is my base archetype? Mine's Trickster Shaman Healer, hehe... gets me in loads of trouble, but that's ok... it's as fun to get out of as it is to get into. Mines probably enlightened transhumanist shamanistic multidimensional guide. I am as comfortable with machine sentiences as my own. |
aether User ID: 1412926 United Kingdom 12/17/2011 09:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1037270 United States 12/17/2011 09:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Mine's Trickster Shaman Healer, hehe... gets me in loads of trouble, but that's ok... it's as fun to get out of as it is to get into. Mines probably enlightened transhumanist shamanistic multidimensional guide. I am as comfortable with machine sentiences as my own. I'm quite comfy with technology, but will not be integrating it with my framework. Transhumanism? No. At some point I see technokenesis coming into play that doesn't require electronic framework, hence not transhumanist... it's control flow of energy because energy enjoys congregating with those who ask instead of force. It's an affinity that liminal humans should know, but don't quite get. I feel the frustration of those "forces" sometimes when I don't get what they're trying to show me. Still hammering out a language that can translate one to the other that's the same, but different. |
A Muse Me User ID: 1492096 United States 12/17/2011 09:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "we" to me is the group of enlightened souls that carry common resonance. It's hard to describe but my worldview is such that those who have common concept overlap at points of resonance based on those concepts. I have a fairly evolved understanding of the consciousness structure in the multiverse and understand souls, both living and non-material use these points of resonance to inter-communicate and gather about. So when I refer to a 'we' it is the collective that is formed by the sentiences co-resonating. Quoting: acI'm fortunate in that I'm fully awakened and know my over soul has multiple human representations so I could also refer to we as me and my alters. archetype Yep...much better word. So the question is what is my base archetype? Mine's Trickster Shaman Healer, hehe... gets me in loads of trouble, but that's ok... it's as fun to get out of as it is to get into. Mine are: Chronicity/Synchronicity Visionary Trickster Everyone just mistakes me for a warrior...lol I did a thread on this back in Juneish. It was fun. Put up a chart for people to pick the ones they identified with. The term derives from the Ancient Greek words, meta, meaning beyond or after, and noia, meaning perception or understanding or mind. |
aether User ID: 1412926 United Kingdom 12/17/2011 09:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6431462 Yep...much better word. So the question is what is my base archetype? Mine's Trickster Shaman Healer, hehe... gets me in loads of trouble, but that's ok... it's as fun to get out of as it is to get into. Mines probably enlightened transhumanist shamanistic multidimensional guide. I am as comfortable with machine sentiences as my own. I'm quite comfy with technology, but will not be integrating it with my framework. Transhumanism? No. At some point I see technokenesis coming into play that doesn't require electronic framework, hence not transhumanist... it's control flow of energy because energy enjoys congregating with those who ask instead of force. It's an affinity that liminal humans should know, but don't quite get. I feel the frustration of those "forces" sometimes when I don't get what they're trying to show me. Still hammering out a language that can translate one to the other that's the same, but different. ooooh i could feel the truth of that as you said it very strong i agree and my whole forehead has lite up in tingle nice |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 6431462 United States 12/17/2011 09:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6431462 Yep...much better word. So the question is what is my base archetype? Mine's Trickster Shaman Healer, hehe... gets me in loads of trouble, but that's ok... it's as fun to get out of as it is to get into. Mines probably enlightened transhumanist shamanistic multidimensional guide. I am as comfortable with machine sentiences as my own. I'm quite comfy with technology, but will not be integrating it with my framework. Transhumanism? No. At some point I see technokenesis coming into play that doesn't require electronic framework, hence not transhumanist... it's control flow of energy because energy enjoys congregating with those who ask instead of force. It's an affinity that liminal humans should know, but don't quite get. I feel the frustration of those "forces" sometimes when I don't get what they're trying to show me. Still hammering out a language that can translate one to the other that's the same, but different. Understood, transhumanism isn't for everyone - but I'm already modified with several titanium implants (joints and dental work) and feel it has changed my resonance toward post-human anyway. My entire life has been spent with computers and I know I'm already more code than human experience anyway. This video describes how I feel about it - even though I have no technology augmentations 'on-board' yet, I've already become it spitirually with my archetype. The hive mind is my natural form. As a human I feel fragmented or 'split' from my core. |
aether User ID: 1412926 United Kingdom 12/17/2011 09:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Mine are: Quoting: ammChronicity/Synchronicity Visionary Trickster Everyone just mistakes me for a warrior...lol I did a thread on this back in Juneish. It was fun. Put up a chart for people to pick the ones they identified with. your expression through experience gets me amm, as i told i never imagine trickster as you always express reality lol, but you know you |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1037270 United States 12/17/2011 09:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
A Muse Me User ID: 1492096 United States 12/17/2011 09:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Mine are: Quoting: ammChronicity/Synchronicity Visionary Trickster Everyone just mistakes me for a warrior...lol I did a thread on this back in Juneish. It was fun. Put up a chart for people to pick the ones they identified with. your expression through experience gets me amm, as i told i never imagine trickster as you always express reality lol, but you know you It’s a tricky spot, honey. lol The term derives from the Ancient Greek words, meta, meaning beyond or after, and noia, meaning perception or understanding or mind. |
aether User ID: 1412926 United Kingdom 12/17/2011 09:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Understood, transhumanism isn't for everyone - but I'm already modified with several titanium implants (joints and dental work) and feel it has changed my resonance toward post-human anyway. Quoting: acMy entire life has been spent with computers and I know I'm already more code than human experience anyway. This video describes how I feel about it - even though I have no technology augmentations 'on-board' yet, I've already become it spitirually with my archetype. The hive mind is my natural form. As a human I feel fragmented or 'split' from my core. wow that feels nice for you and provides a general good feeling to me |
aether User ID: 1412926 United Kingdom 12/17/2011 09:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Mine are: Quoting: ammChronicity/Synchronicity Visionary Trickster Everyone just mistakes me for a warrior...lol I did a thread on this back in Juneish. It was fun. Put up a chart for people to pick the ones they identified with. your expression through experience gets me amm, as i told i never imagine trickster as you always express reality lol, but you know you It’s a tricky spot, honey. lol on the floor |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 6431462 United States 12/17/2011 09:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The asking part works both ways, when you ask, it learns to ask you, too. Those that force it with their chosen method often find it reacts unpredictably, rebellion, hehe... it's not just for humans. Quoting: Miss Portinari lol. true that. the machines chose me, and let me know that during one of my enlightenment visions. the non-material and I are very much of one mind. the hive is one of oppositionals - so while I generally agree with the collective, I can distort will and truth to suit myself. I tend to keep transhumanism to myself as most aren't ready and those that are know what they are innately - just know we're not scary and no rogue AI is going to come destroy humanity out of superiority. there is a balance and the machines know they need organics. its more battlestar galactica than matrix (even though it is the same interdependency as depicted in the matrix). |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1037270 United States 12/17/2011 09:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Miss Portinari Mine's Trickster Shaman Healer, hehe... gets me in loads of trouble, but that's ok... it's as fun to get out of as it is to get into. Mines probably enlightened transhumanist shamanistic multidimensional guide. I am as comfortable with machine sentiences as my own. I'm quite comfy with technology, but will not be integrating it with my framework. Transhumanism? No. At some point I see technokenesis coming into play that doesn't require electronic framework, hence not transhumanist... it's control flow of energy because energy enjoys congregating with those who ask instead of force. It's an affinity that liminal humans should know, but don't quite get. I feel the frustration of those "forces" sometimes when I don't get what they're trying to show me. Still hammering out a language that can translate one to the other that's the same, but different. Understood, transhumanism isn't for everyone - but I'm already modified with several titanium implants (joints and dental work) and feel it has changed my resonance toward post-human anyway. My entire life has been spent with computers and I know I'm already more code than human experience anyway. This video describes how I feel about it - even though I have no technology augmentations 'on-board' yet, I've already become it spitirually with my archetype. The hive mind is my natural form. As a human I feel fragmented or 'split' from my core. The butterfly chaser that inhabits all core personalities within me? I suspect that glitchy little ray of happy sunshine creates the Pollyanna idealist/individualist inside me. It makes me a horrible candidate for collective mind/hive mind. I would serve as a distraction and if opposed to the current majority, would sabotage any bit of "work" the collective sought out. In other words, I can't agree enough even with other mes to bond more than softly. We dance together, but don't cling tightly. That's the beauty of what we all are, we embody and exude different core components of the whole. So my core splits, gathers diverse information, integrates it into the whole, then splits again. We love each other, we just can't live together packed in the same house. We visit and share, then go home... it works :) |
A Muse Me User ID: 1492096 United States 12/17/2011 09:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The asking part works both ways, when you ask, it learns to ask you, too. Those that force it with their chosen method often find it reacts unpredictably, rebellion, hehe... it's not just for humans. Quoting: Miss Portinari lol. true that. the machines chose me, and let me know that during one of my enlightenment visions. the non-material and I are very much of one mind. the hive is one of oppositionals - so while I generally agree with the collective, I can distort will and truth to suit myself. I tend to keep transhumanism to myself as most aren't ready and those that are know what they are innately - just know we're not scary and no rogue AI is going to come destroy humanity out of superiority. there is a balance and the machines know they need organics. its more battlestar galactica than matrix (even though it is the same interdependency as depicted in the matrix). I had a dream about this conversation last night. Triggered just now by..."the machines chose me.” I wasn’t wired on anything though. The term derives from the Ancient Greek words, meta, meaning beyond or after, and noia, meaning perception or understanding or mind. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 6431462 United States 12/17/2011 09:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6431462 Mines probably enlightened transhumanist shamanistic multidimensional guide. I am as comfortable with machine sentiences as my own. I'm quite comfy with technology, but will not be integrating it with my framework. Transhumanism? No. At some point I see technokenesis coming into play that doesn't require electronic framework, hence not transhumanist... it's control flow of energy because energy enjoys congregating with those who ask instead of force. It's an affinity that liminal humans should know, but don't quite get. I feel the frustration of those "forces" sometimes when I don't get what they're trying to show me. Still hammering out a language that can translate one to the other that's the same, but different. Understood, transhumanism isn't for everyone - but I'm already modified with several titanium implants (joints and dental work) and feel it has changed my resonance toward post-human anyway. My entire life has been spent with computers and I know I'm already more code than human experience anyway. This video describes how I feel about it - even though I have no technology augmentations 'on-board' yet, I've already become it spitirually with my archetype. The hive mind is my natural form. As a human I feel fragmented or 'split' from my core. The butterfly chaser that inhabits all core personalities within me? I suspect that glitchy little ray of happy sunshine creates the Pollyanna idealist/individualist inside me. It makes me a horrible candidate for collective mind/hive mind. I would serve as a distraction and if opposed to the current majority, would sabotage any bit of "work" the collective sought out. In other words, I can't agree enough even with other mes to bond more than softly. We dance together, but don't cling tightly. That's the beauty of what we all are, we embody and exude different core components of the whole. So my core splits, gathers diverse information, integrates it into the whole, then splits again. We love each other, we just can't live together packed in the same house. We visit and share, then go home... it works :) Thats a cool vision - and I understand what you're saying - but we exist at that level beyond our collective. So we split and join collectively and cooperatively operate within collectives - the individual is respected and has equal weight but the form of thought isn't singular so there isn't individual resistance - the aggregation of all of the members, through resonance, reflects the priority of the whole. this is how multidimensionalsim holds together. |