Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology

something has to do with copy...and I just got that part of it today, so it's too new atm...

From the youtube aether put up...it was talking about how even before mri machines, this guy de la marr, I think, did an experiment with his wife who was an rv'er. She only needed a drop of blood from a cow(that was sick and the owners couldn't figure out what was wrong) and somehow they wound up with an image of cow and in its stomach was a rod or something and that is why the cow was sick. So in a drop of blood contains the whole memory/image of the cow...like a whole copy. If I;m making sense!lol

Those, by nature, who control the universe are controlling. They enjoy their cycles and repititions as they give them the false veneer of knowledge and prescience in predictability.

They are terrified of the egoless that would share this knowledge freeely. As they would lose their specialness, expertise and false front of control. They are also terrified of those that know through their academic assertions that informed collectives of free thinkers would also expedite potentials in all fields of human endeavour. As they again would be stripped of their 'special' status.

Thus, they seek to obscure knowledge generationally and share it within only cadres of selfsame egotistical creatures. In short, recycling trends that are comfortable to their ambitions.

Their greatest fear, that the universe will somehow level the playing field.

Those, by nature, who control the universe are controlling. They enjoy their cycles and repititions as they give them the false veneer of knowledge and prescience in predictability.

They are terrified of the egoless that would share this knowledge freeely. As they would lose their specialness, expertise and false front of control. They are also terrified of those that know through their academic assertions that informed collectives of free thinkers would also expedite potentials in all fields of human endeavour. As they again would be stripped of their 'special' status.

Thus, they seek to obscure knowledge generationally and share it within only cadres of selfsame egotistical creatures. In short, recycling trends that are comfortable to their ambitions.

Their greatest fear, that the universe will somehow level the playing field.

Has history of civilization been tampered with?

Conspiracy? Nothing of the sorts. Why then the world history and especially its chronology were tampered with? Let us introduce a hypothesis that to boast, to lie, to pretend was (is?) a part of the human nature. On one hand, everybody justified the claims laid to the titles, and lands by alleged ancestry and its glorious deeds. On the other hand the court historians knew only too well how to please their masters. No need for conspiracy for that.

Did events and eras such as the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, the Roman Empire , the Dark Ages, and the Renaissance, actually occur within a very different chronology from what we've been told? Maybe the history of THE CIVILIZATION is both drastically shorter and dramatically different than generally presumed, in spite of the of Homo sapiens crowd (that’s us) being around for 150 000 years at least and age of the planet Earth being over 4.5 billion years. It's highly unlikely that anyone told you before that there is not ONE single piece of firm written evidence or artefact that is reliably, independently and irrefutably dated older than the 11th century.

The so called universal classic world history is a pack of intricate lies for MOST events prior to the 16th century. World history as we learn it today was entirely fabricated in the 16th-18th centuries on the ‘firm’ foundation laid down by Italian ‘scholars’ idem white and black robe clergy, idem ‘humanists’ in 14th-15th centuries. Petrarca and Dante, Bracciolinni and Macciavelli, Giotto, Bernini, Da Vinci and Michelangelo Corporations not only created immortal masterpieces exceedingly well paid by Roman Popes et al and Medici Princes of Florence, but also mass produced ‘ancient’ manuscripts, frescoes, statues very much in demand by the wealthy customers from England, France, Germany and Russia.

Oxbridge scholars earned their daily bread & butter by cooking very Ancient Greece & Roman Empire history mostly from Italian ingredients. The Glorious Revolution in England has already taken place, the British Empire was in works and badly needed glorious predecessors like the Roman Empire. The French learned crowd made their encyclopaedic cuisine of alleged Roman Republic history preparing the French minds for an Ideal Republic to come.

The French Kings out of pure spite of all things English (!) made a ‘successful’ live test of Ideal Republic 1776 in British American colonies by helping American freedom fighters to free their lands from the British crown and to found The United States of America. British Empire paid back by helping French freedom fighters to make dream of the French scholars come true, to found French Republic in 1789, etc….Somehow very liberal King Louis XVI lost control, head and crown which the one Corsican Bouenaparté found in the gutter of the Revolution and became Napoleon I Emperor (!) of the French Republic (!) etc..

Of course, neither generations after generations of historians, nor Hollywood scriptwriters can’t be totally in the wrong. After what was learned in school and university, no one you will easily believe that the classical history of ancient Rome, Greece, Asia, Egypt, China, Japan, India, etc., is manifestly false. Everyone will indignantly point the accusing finger to the gigantic pyramids in Egypt, to the Coliseum in Rome and Great Wall of China etc., and claim, aren't they really ancient, thousands of years ancient?

Certainly they were built before the 15th century. No doubt whatsoever that the Renaissance artists, sculptors, architects and engineers have not built pyramids in Egypt or gigantic palaces in Persia, Great Wall in China, etc.. But a closer look at ‘evidence’ of the age of 777 Wonders of the Antiquity a suspicion that they were built 3-5 hundred years before, not thousands of years earlier.

It just happens that there is no valid irrefutable scientific proof that ALL ‘ancient’ artefacts are much older than 1000 years contrary to the self fulfilling radiocarbon dating obligingly rubber-stamped by radiocarbon labs to the prescriptions of the mainstream historians. How heartbreaking is that the oldest ORIGINAL written documents that can be reliably, irrefutably and unambiguously dated belong only to the 11th century! All dirty and worn out originals have somehow disappeared in the Very Dark Ages, as illiterate but tidy monks kept only brand new copies. Better yet, most of the very old original document of 11th-13th tell very peculiar stories completely out of line with the consensual history.

Already done...that's the rub...

I'm never sure of anything but potential and motive. The art is not in being sure. It's in the unconciousness, instinctive reactions.

D


Getting punny eh...

Huh? Are you? No cow here! haha

Now u see?

Attempt at fixing bold failed...

Agree...was merely noting an observance of occurance...
Never is also a word i would catagorize with surety...

Attempt at fixing bold failed...

DNA carries the wisdom and understanding of our ancestors.

We already have the knowledge and skills we need.
Instead of learning new skills, we are unlocking sections in our brain which store unlimited potential.

All matter is vibrational in nature and it's slowed down enough so the "human" can experience a physical reality.

The battle between the spirit and the flesh is the soul striving to stir stored information for enlightenment and to promote understanding among all people.

The null is within you. But, we are choice. Limitless visions are created which we cannot see as we are deluded by rules which act as blinders as what is allowed to be seen.

If dna is acquired blindness from age to age, we have many sins to reconcile before we slough off our shackles.

I believe that is why many crave doom as they feel the metals of our captivity are impervious to the tools we possess.

My belief is that we must solely allow ourselves to believe. As it will be the vibration of that knowledge which sets us free.

I like to liken the source to a surfer catching an unrideably huge wave, while having a three way with the male or female or even transgender supermodels of their choice, while snuffing aliens on their psp and snacking on the most delicious flavour that a billion minds could create.

All of this simultaneously with trillions of other unfathomable experiences; solely by the indulgence of the fact that the source is only aware of the precision balance of unconciousness to the awareness that these are impossibilities, improbabilities or even incapabilities.

In other words, you are capable of doing that which you invest yourself in without thought to the outcome.

I like to liken the source to a surfer catching an unrideably huge wave, while having a three way with the male or female or even transgender supermodels of their choice, while snuffing aliens on their psp and snacking on the most delicious flavour that a billion minds could create.

All of this simultaneously with trillions of other unfathomable experiences; solely by the indulgence of the fact that the source is only aware of the precision balance of unconciousness to the awareness that these are impossibilities, improbabilities or even incapabilities.

In other words, you are capable of doing that which you invest yourself in without thought to the outcome.

all within a motive thus although appearing infinite within random probability they are infinite within defined possibility (motive)

Inevitability, swim or die. The answer is always in the question or questioner.

I think therefore I fail.