Why Is Gifford Subscribed To Loughner's YouTube?

There are only 2 subscriptions. Neither being Loughlins. Am I missing something or has it been changed?


Okay this is f'ing killing me. Where do you see this? I can't see who Gifford is subscribed to. Damnit.

There are only 2 subscriptions. Neither being Loughlins. Am I missing something or has it been changed?


Okay this is f'ing killing me. Where do you see this? I can't see who Gifford is subscribed to. Damnit.

I don't usually comment much but felt I should. Perhaps one of her distraught family members was doing their own investigation into who shot "mom" and isn't particularly internet/youtube savvy and subscribed in order to bookmark who the assailant was. There's an innocuous way of interpreting this too that shouldn't be ruled out.

From another thread:

[link to img717.imageshack.us]

It shows her being subscribed to the killer...notice the last login date....2 days ago. So she was subscribed before the shooting.

This is a complete smoking gun.

A) Why would Giffords subscribe to a complete nobody on Youtube, whose videos are all insane rants?
B) Even if there is a reasonable explanation for the above, what are the odds she subscribes to his page within the time range of mid-December when he made his youtube, and (according to last login date) January 6, 2 days before the shooting actually occured?

This needs to get attention, like, this is legitimately newsworthy and damning proof of something more going on.

you would have to look at his youtube channel to see who subscribed to him, a congress person would allow almost anyone in their district to subsrcibe to them because they may vote for her ya see.

There are only 2 subscriptions. Neither being Loughlins. Am I missing something or has it been changed?


Okay this is f'ing killing me. Where do you see this? I can't see who Gifford is subscribed to. Damnit.


Oh shit my bad. It's on the bottom of her page in the lower left.

I kept overlooking it and was convinced you were all fucking crazy.



But yeah I only see the two and they don't look like that Loughlin guy.

There are only 2 subscriptions. Neither being Loughlins. Am I missing something or has it been changed?


Okay this is f'ing killing me. Where do you see this? I can't see who Gifford is subscribed to. Damnit.



Way at the bottom.
Lower left hand side

Subscriptions (2)
Classit... AND..............RepIkeS...

From another thread:

[link to img717.imageshack.us]

It shows her being subscribed to the killer...notice the last login date....2 days ago. So she was subscribed before the shooting.

This is a complete smoking gun.

A) Why would Giffords subscribe to a complete nobody on Youtube, whose videos are all insane rants?
B) Even if there is a reasonable explanation for the above, what are the odds she subscribes to his page within the time range of mid-December when he made his youtube, and (according to last login date) January 6, 2 days before the shooting actually occured?

This needs to get attention, like, this is legitimately newsworthy and damning proof of something more going on.




That photo ONLY shows 2 subscriptions. None being the killer.

What the fuck are you people talking about???????

They don't look it because they're not.

Why is the OP making idiotic rumors????

There are only 2 subscriptions. Neither being Loughlins. Am I missing something or has it been changed?


Okay this is f'ing killing me. Where do you see this? I can't see who Gifford is subscribed to. Damnit.



Way at the bottom.
Lower left hand side

Subscriptions (2)
Classit... AND..............RepIkeS...


That Classit guy is Loughlin.



Weird. I'll bet someone hacked it??

you would have to look at his youtube channel to see who subscribed to him, a congress person would allow almost anyone in their district to subsrcibe to them because they may vote for her ya see.

SHE is subscribed to HIM.

Again, everyone needs to look at this picture and I'll requote my original post on this:

[link to img717.imageshack.us]

This is a complete smoking gun.

A) Why would Giffords subscribe to a complete nobody on Youtube, whose videos are all insane rants?
B) Even if there is a reasonable explanation for the above, what are the odds she subscribes to his page within the time range of mid-December when he made his youtube, and (according to last login date) January 6, 2 days before the shooting actually occured?

This needs to get attention, like, this is legitimately newsworthy and damning proof of something more going on.

From another thread:

[link to img717.imageshack.us]

It shows her being subscribed to the killer...notice the last login date....2 days ago. So she was subscribed before the shooting.

This is a complete smoking gun.

A) Why would Giffords subscribe to a complete nobody on Youtube, whose videos are all insane rants?
B) Even if there is a reasonable explanation for the above, what are the odds she subscribes to his page within the time range of mid-December when he made his youtube, and (according to last login date) January 6, 2 days before the shooting actually occured?

This needs to get attention, like, this is legitimately newsworthy and damning proof of something more going on.




That photo ONLY shows 2 subscriptions. None being the killer.

What the fuck are you people talking about???????

You are either blind, or a shill. The picture clearly shows the exact same subscribers, classitup + repike.

This is a huge hole in the entire story, so my guess is you're a shill trying to do damage control.

They don't look it because they're not.

Why is the OP making idiotic rumors????

You are a bloody shill.

Seriously, anyone with half a brain needs to read all these posts, check the pic, and recognize the facts:

She was subscribed to his page BEFORE THE SHOOTING OCCURED.

The above poster is either retarded or SURELY a shill. Please don't attempt to fool people, this is all in plain sight.

Honestly people this needs a pin, this is legitimately the most reasonable and obvious conspiracy situation I have seen on this website yet.

One more time:

The congresswoman was subscribed to her shooters youtube page, at least TWO DAYS BEFORE THE SHOOTING.

PIN THIS AND EXPLAIN.

Says Giffords last visit date was 10 hours ago.

Good find, OP! She is subscribed to two channels.. and one is his??? Very strange indeed!

Says Giffords last visit date was 10 hours ago.

[link to img717.imageshack.us]

Says last visit date was 2 days ago, was taken yesterday, and is still subscribed.


Jesus christ people, for a conspiracy forum none of you seem to be very conscious of what is clearly an extremely mysterious occurrence.

Why are more people not commenting on this? For real!

Her husband is an astronaut. I have a feeling that her husband knew a little ''too much'' and someone made an example of his wife and her co-workers. Maybe her co-workers were told about something that they shouldnt have known eather. Who knows ?