Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,110 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 967,401
Pageviews Today: 1,609,719Threads Today: 510Posts Today: 9,705
03:56 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

1/13/2011 - 9/11 PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Occupancy FOIA * 1972-2001

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1152974
United States
01/14/2011 11:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1/13/2011 - 9/11 PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Occupancy FOIA * 1972-2001
bump
C74R1TY-44

User ID: 1178496
United States
01/14/2011 11:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1/13/2011 - 9/11 PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Occupancy FOIA * 1972-2001
this should be pinned if it wasn't already
The storm is closing in to begin again from the beginning. Never sitting through my waking life oblivious. The ignorance running rampant through the city is indicative of something worse; this picture isn't pretty.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1230537
United States
01/15/2011 12:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1/13/2011 - 9/11 PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Occupancy FOIA * 1972-2001
Letsroll is a bullshit cointel pro site. They promote wacky theories about 9/11. Fake jumpers, mannequins being thrown out windows, people with harnesses pretending to be waving for help out the windows, fake dead people on the ground, fake Edna Citron seen standing in the plane hole, Sept clues no-planes bullshit. The list goes on and on.


I would be careful believing the tenant list they present.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1155369
United States
01/15/2011 12:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1/13/2011 - 9/11 PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Occupancy FOIA * 1972-2001
Letsroll is a bullshit cointel pro site. They promote wacky theories about 9/11. Fake jumpers, mannequins being thrown out windows, people with harnesses pretending to be waving for help out the windows, fake dead people on the ground, fake Edna Citron seen standing in the plane hole, Sept clues no-planes bullshit. The list goes on and on.


I would be careful believing the tenant list they present.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1230537



Thank you so much for your expert analysis. What would we all do without someone like you?

It's about time everyone wake up and start focusing on those al-qciada terrorist who hijacked those planes and crashed them into those office buildings.

Thanks again for pulling our heads out of our asses:)

ps-FAIL
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1227560
United States
01/15/2011 12:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1/13/2011 - 9/11 PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Occupancy FOIA * 1972-2001
Letsroll is a bullshit cointel pro site. They promote wacky theories about 9/11. Fake jumpers, mannequins being thrown out windows, people with harnesses pretending to be waving for help out the windows, fake dead people on the ground, fake Edna Citron seen standing in the plane hole, Sept clues no-planes bullshit. The list goes on and on.


I would be careful believing the tenant list they present.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1230537
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1227560
United States
01/15/2011 12:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1/13/2011 - 9/11 PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Occupancy FOIA * 1972-2001
whoops, wrong quote.

Anyway, isn't it possible that this FOIA document only shows the most RECENT leaseholder data?? For example, LetsRoll makes the statement that Floors 9-10-11-12-13 & 14 were totally unoccupied from time construction was finished until Bank of America moved in in late 1993. But isn't it possible there WERE other tenants on those floors prior to BofA's occupancy?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1155369
United States
01/15/2011 01:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1/13/2011 - 9/11 PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Occupancy FOIA * 1972-2001
whoops, wrong quote.

Anyway, isn't it possible that this FOIA document only shows the most RECENT leaseholder data?? For example, LetsRoll makes the statement that Floors 9-10-11-12-13 & 14 were totally unoccupied from time construction was finished until Bank of America moved in in late 1993. But isn't it possible there WERE other tenants on those floors prior to BofA's occupancy?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1227560



Good question but the answer is no. The FOIA shows a few with 1972 leases. There are a limited few with years such as 82, 86,88 etc. The FOIA is for ALL leases from opening (1972 I believe) till the buildings were sold to Silverstein a few months before 911.

Read the link in the OP and all your questions will be answered.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 390917
France
01/15/2011 11:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1/13/2011 - 9/11 PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Occupancy FOIA * 1972-2001
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1010320
United States
01/15/2011 12:13 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1/13/2011 - 9/11 PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Occupancy FOIA * 1972-2001
whoops, wrong quote.

Anyway, isn't it possible that this FOIA document only shows the most RECENT leaseholder data?? For example, LetsRoll makes the statement that Floors 9-10-11-12-13 & 14 were totally unoccupied from time construction was finished until Bank of America moved in in late 1993. But isn't it possible there WERE other tenants on those floors prior to BofA's occupancy?



Good question but the answer is no. The FOIA shows a few with 1972 leases. There are a limited few with years such as 82, 86,88 etc. The FOIA is for ALL leases from opening (1972 I believe) till the buildings were sold to Silverstein a few months before 911.

Read the link in the OP and all your questions will be answered.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1155369

What about subleases?
I know there never was much activity there,
always wondered about that,
i.e, for such a large complex.
galdur

User ID: 1229845
Iceland
01/15/2011 12:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1/13/2011 - 9/11 PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Occupancy FOIA * 1972-2001
PIN IT.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1221609
United States
01/15/2011 01:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1/13/2011 - 9/11 PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Occupancy FOIA * 1972-2001
Read the link in the OP and all your questions will be answered.

What about subleases?
I know there never was much activity there,
always wondered about that,
i.e, for such a large complex.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1010320


I remember on 9/11 the MSM was pounding the 50,000 number...as to how many usually work there everyday...


50,000 people usually work there...hmmmmm
where did they pull this number to use
50,000 could be dead !!!
It does have an initial catastrophic impact..
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1231117
United States
01/15/2011 01:13 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1/13/2011 - 9/11 PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Occupancy FOIA * 1972-2001
thanks op
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1221609
United States
01/15/2011 01:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1/13/2011 - 9/11 PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Occupancy FOIA * 1972-2001
Read the link in the OP and all your questions will be answered.

What about subleases?
I know there never was much activity there,
always wondered about that,
i.e, for such a large complex.


I remember on 9/11 the MSM was pounding the 50,000 number...as to how many usually work there everyday...


50,000 people usually work there...hmmmmm
where did they pull this number to use
50,000 could be dead !!!
It does have an initial catastrophic impact..
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1221609



lo and behold ,
good old Wiki "confirms" it..
from wikipedipfile
[link to en.wikipedia.org]
Life and events

On a typical weekday 50,000 people worked in the towers[79] with another 200,000 passing through as visitors.[80]

where did this 50,000 number originate ?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1221609
United States
01/15/2011 01:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1/13/2011 - 9/11 PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Occupancy FOIA * 1972-2001
I hate to burst your bubble...

BUT

I knew someone who worked at Windows on the World for YEARS since it opened.

This is pure bsflag

I'm not sure where this document is from, but the towers were occupied with clients. The document is obviously inaccurate on some level because Windows on the World was open in the 1980s and earlier.

If I am wrong then so be it... but I am pretty sure I am not.
 Quoting: Least Servant
so you know someone who who took an elevator and bypassed 100 floors.
so big deal.
the restaurant is part of the cover ! ya doofus
look at this picture.
your buddy who worked at the psy-op with a sweet view did not investigate tenants inside the towers..
[link to letsrollforums.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 816251
United States
01/15/2011 01:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1/13/2011 - 9/11 PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Occupancy FOIA * 1972-2001
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1228265
United Kingdom
01/15/2011 01:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1/13/2011 - 9/11 PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Occupancy FOIA * 1972-2001
bsflag


Floors 78, 4142, 7576, and 108109 were mechanical floors.

Floor 110 in the North Tower was for transmissions equipment.


Same with Taipei 101 which has a lot more mechanical floors.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1162162
United States
01/15/2011 01:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1/13/2011 - 9/11 PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Occupancy FOIA * 1972-2001
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1155369
United States
01/15/2011 03:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1/13/2011 - 9/11 PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Occupancy FOIA * 1972-2001
bsflag


Floors 78, 4142, 7576, and 108109 were mechanical floors.

Floor 110 in the North Tower was for transmissions equipment.


Same with Taipei 101 which has a lot more mechanical floors.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1228265


FAIL
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1231247
United States
01/15/2011 03:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1/13/2011 - 9/11 PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Occupancy FOIA * 1972-2001
bump for truth
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1155369
United States
01/15/2011 04:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1/13/2011 - 9/11 PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Occupancy FOIA * 1972-2001
bump for truth
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1231247


Agreed! And this FOIA speaks volumes of the true reality of the WTC:)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1003917
United States
01/15/2011 05:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1/13/2011 - 9/11 PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Occupancy FOIA * 1972-2001
So, none of those touristis who went to the observation decks ever saw anyone and never said anything about? huuurrrrrrrrrrrr
On top of that, of fucking course the lower levels were empty, you explained it your fucking self, "PRESTIGE."

But obviously they were empty and not a single New Yorker ever noticed that no one went in or out......duuuuuuurrrrrrrrrr
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1221609
United States
01/15/2011 05:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1/13/2011 - 9/11 PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Occupancy FOIA * 1972-2001
So, none of those touristis who went to the observation decks ever saw anyone and never said anything about? huuurrrrrrrrrrrr
On top of that, of fucking course the lower levels were empty, you explained it your fucking self, "PRESTIGE."

But obviously they were empty and not a single New Yorker ever noticed that no one went in or out......duuuuuuurrrrrrrrrr
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1003917


notice what? counting people going in and out? lol

did 50,000 people normally work at the towers ?

did 200,000 people visit there everyday ?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1221609
United States
01/15/2011 05:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1/13/2011 - 9/11 PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Occupancy FOIA * 1972-2001
PIN this !
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1221609
United States
01/15/2011 05:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1/13/2011 - 9/11 PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Occupancy FOIA * 1972-2001
PIN this !
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1221609

pin pin pin..
so i can hear more folks who say they knew someone who worked there.LOL's
let's get this story out there
Da Cat

User ID: 1231445
United States
01/15/2011 07:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1/13/2011 - 9/11 PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Occupancy FOIA * 1972-2001
Thomas-Scott Gordon

The structural integrity of the massive World Trade Center Towers was contingent upon the combined -value of *both* the internal, perimeter STEEL columns and the adjoining ALUMINIUM Fascia panels.

Over the years, the process known as 'galvanic corrosion' had structurally degraded these buildings beyond repair. Supporting statements to this effect had been compiled, and were presented by the engineers to the building owners during the time-frame that I have described. Subsequently, both Mayor Giuiliani's Office, and the New York Port Authority, had allegedly received an order for the buildings to be completely dismantled, by 2007.

[link to www.scholarsfor911truth.org]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1155369
United States
01/15/2011 08:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1/13/2011 - 9/11 PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Occupancy FOIA * 1972-2001
So, none of those touristis who went to the observation decks ever saw anyone and never said anything about? huuurrrrrrrrrrrr
On top of that, of fucking course the lower levels were empty, you explained it your fucking self, "PRESTIGE."

But obviously they were empty and not a single New Yorker ever noticed that no one went in or out......duuuuuuurrrrrrrrrr
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1003917



I believe this is exactly what the WTC was-- a tourist spot that thousands visited daily. They cluttered the lobby, lined up and bought their tickets, and took an express elevator to the top.

Same with the other tower except this was to the restaurant.

The illusion that the floors between were filled with thriving business has been proven with this FOIA.

If this is much to grasp then join the flock and accept the LIE.

Hopefully evidence like this FOIA will wake more people up. The evidence is so f*^kn obvious but many just can't seem to grasp it:(
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1073930
United States
01/15/2011 09:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1/13/2011 - 9/11 PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Occupancy FOIA * 1972-2001
The FOIA is a legal document, prepared by the Port Authority.

Call it bullshit or whatever, but it is what it is.

To clearly answer the above question, the FOIA request included ALL leases from the beginning to the sale. You can find many examples where there is an old lease and a current lease for the same space.

According to the PA NY/NJ that is it.




People really have a hard time believing something so obvious, and it is the nature of Goebbel's Big Lie. Some people also have a hard time admitting, even to themselves, that they were fooled completely by a carefully planned Big Lie.

I know I was.


What don't you get? The towers were giant tourist attractions/paper tigers/trojan horses. Millions invested in them, trillions paid out after the 30 year term.

Insiders got filthy rich, their buddies even richer from war profiteering.



The TV told me people worked there, so they did. That's your answer in the face of a document given by the source itself?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1155747
United Kingdom
01/15/2011 09:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1/13/2011 - 9/11 PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Occupancy FOIA * 1972-2001
Pin this shit! bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1231509
United States
01/15/2011 10:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1/13/2011 - 9/11 PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Occupancy FOIA * 1972-2001
:pin:
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1073930
United States
01/15/2011 10:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1/13/2011 - 9/11 PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Occupancy FOIA * 1972-2001
pin and let the people decide!





GLP