ALERT!!! FUKUSHIMA FAKE PHOTOS!! THEY ARE HIDING MUCH MORE THAN RADIATION LEVELS | |
JF Priest User ID: 1069469 United States 03/25/2011 12:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Of course a tsunami did hit the plant! All the surrounding coast was hit and the plant escaped? Some of the first photos clearly show the tsunami-ravaged areas in front of the reactor buildings. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1309495A good conspiracy theory must make sense, and what you say does only make sense if you willingly ignore REALITY. Then where is the damage in the photos .. did you even look before you posted.. be an adult and actually look at the evidence before you comment.. No trees knocked down.. no damage other than some debris at the front of the plant on the ocean.. nothing behind the first line of buildings.. no debris on the roads.. no debris in the gardens.. Cars parked neatly in their places.. no freaking way I am not saying the tsunami didnt hit further up.. Im not saying that it didnt hit at all.. My theory is simply there is something not right.. now it could be it hit worse.. and that is why we are not getting any new wide view arial shots of it.. most of them have been close in of the reactors.. and how do we know they are the fukushima reactors..what if they are another plant that is damaged... what if the fukushima one was obliterated... I dont know what it is .. its why i posted.. to get other input.. other ideas.. but i definately know those photos show NO Tsunami damage.. they are faked.. This is why i come To GLP... Way to Go OP... It Only Hurts If You Care... |
EW (OP) User ID: 1308017 Australia 03/25/2011 12:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | .. god you idiots deserve to die from this radiation.. Quoting: EW 1308017You know what OP, just because someone doesn't agree with you doesn't mean they should be dead? Wow, if you can't take the heat...get out of the kitchen!! You make claims, you better be prepared to back them up. But back them up with facts and be prepared for someone to try and debunk you!! If they can, you need to be receptive to the fact "you could be wrong". That is the FIRST thing in seeking the truth. If you can NOT accept the fact the you could be proven wrong, then it is NOT the truth you are after at all!!!! Which is it? You're right, it was an uncalled for comment, im just frustrated with the level of ignorance that people just accept what they are fed from the main stream media and do no research and dont even notice the differences in photos of 3 different plants.. then come here and say stupid shit to me when I have put the links up and proven what i say.. If i was wrong I would appologise.. and I do appologise for the comment.. however I am not wrong about the photos.. people have been lied to and deliberately had photos of the wrong plants paraded around to cause just this kind of confusion.. If they follow the links in order and look at them its easy to see which plant is which and what is where.. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1296389 United States 03/25/2011 12:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Did you look at the photos I linked in this article??? Quoting: EW 1308017Did you look at this video? [link to www.youtube.com] Sorry to say it, a tsunami indeed hit Fukushima. Accept it that you were wrong, i can do it aswell. That's gotta be a mislabeled video..I thinks it's from before any wave hit. In the very beginning you can see the water just starting to recede, and on the ground starting around :24 in, there's absolutely no water on the ground around the plant...anywhere. Is there anybody on this forum who thinks the quakes might have damaged the facilities..? Its right after the wave hit you fucking idiot. You can see the wave going back out to sea away from the sea walls. Seriously the fucking shills are out in force, but it appears most on GLP are seeing thought this SHILL PSYOP to make us question reality. Reality is there is a full on meltdown taking place in multiple reactors at the Fukushima plant as we type. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1301376 United States 03/25/2011 12:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think the plant was hit with that computer virus, causing it to go into meltdown somehow triggering the earthquake or else the earthquake was man-made too. CGI generated video keeps everyone focused on other issues instead of an act of terrorism. Suddenly the world becomes concerned about nuke plants in their neck of the woods...I wonder why? The virus? We go to war against Libya all the sudden? I don't know how this could be linked to Libya, but maybe it is. Another thing...the Navy shot a Trident thermonuclear in the pacific ocean missle on the same day as the earthquake. The missle was configured for test purposes the military said. Is this all connected in anyway? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1182180 United States 03/25/2011 01:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1313706 United Kingdom 03/25/2011 01:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I see the shills are trying to play the "elevation" game, as though the Fukushima buildings and parking lot were too high above sea level to be impacted! How could an approximately 45 foot (14 Meters) tsunami wave NOT get to the parking lot and surrounding trees, etc.??? C'mon shills, BS my 45 ft. figures, then read this, from TEPCO themselves (March 23), the owners of these nuclear properties: Quoting: Mick 1212411[link to www.world-nuclear-news.org] So there you have it: TEPCO is standing by a 45 ft tsunami, that would have EASILY ripped clean the surrounding landscape and buildings, JUST LIKE the footage from Minaminosa and Sendai. SHOW THE THE 45 ft. TSUNAMI IMPACT ON FUKUSHIMA AND IMMEDIATE SURROUNDINGS, or face the FACTS: somebody is trying hard to cover SOMETHING up, we just know WHAT yet. Remember how you felt when you started to see the holes in the story months and years after 9/11?? Well, we are getting an ealy jump on this cover up of "something". GREAT JOB OP, this is THE MOST IMPORTANT THREAD on GLP right now...keep digging folks wave height 45ft = 13.72m elevation car park on the right 29m on the left 25m |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1238809 Germany 03/25/2011 01:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1301376 United States 03/25/2011 01:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | wow!!!!!! wow wow!!! it says SOS H with a circle around the H! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1301376Haven't you ever seen a helipad before? "H" with a circle around it is the international sign for a helicopter landing location. Thanks for clarifying that for me. I didn't know. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1296389 United States 03/25/2011 01:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | One plant is being used to film the staged event, the other plant is the true problem? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1166283Where have we seen this recently? Gulf Oil Disaster, same M.O.! No I believe multiple plants were fucked and they are only Showing us the one they have to. Kinda like the Deep Water Horizon Event. Its hard to hide a 3000 foot explosion so they just let the media obsess about this plant (which is going to hell) while all the others went to Hell Behind the scenes. Obviously from the video that was provided in the thread there was video from when the wave actually hit the plant, so the public knew there was a problem there. The situation went down hill so fast there was no way to hide it. |
EW (OP) User ID: 1308017 Australia 03/25/2011 01:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ok.. this is very simple.. Quoting: Cellzthe tsunami wasnt faked it happened.. but it did not hit the fukushima plant.. all the debris there are from the explosions that happened on the plants.. maybe the wave did hit the plants but it was so small that it had little effect.. a 4 - 6 foot wave could have easily floated off the fuel tanks for the backup generators like they said.. the main reason the japs are lying is because they are at fault by not retrofitting the plants to withstand earthquakes about 6 - 6.9 magnitude.. so basically.. the japs are trying to blame the tsunami otherwise they can be sued on a mega level.. imagine all of japan in on a class action lawsuit? they are blaming tsunami because they didnt manage these plants properly and there could actually be criminal and or civil reprecussions because of this.. japan is just trying to save its ass.. its not a psyop by us its a psyop by japan.. and the reason there arent alot of independant photos is because the japanese are probably telling reporters and shit the radiation levels are too high etc.. someone really fucked japan with the quake and tsunami.. but japan fucked itself by running cheap ass nuclear plants.. its a fuckin no brainer.. highly active earthquake area.. but yet you dont prepare your nuclear plants to withstand the big ones which were all possible of happening in this region.. they fucked up and they are just trying to save face.. they are trying to make their nuclear plant fuckup a part of the natural disaster.. thats it and thats all.. THAT MAKES ALOT OF SENSE.. |
DDan User ID: 1313690 Germany 03/25/2011 01:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | .. god you idiots deserve to die from this radiation.. Quoting: EW 1308017You know what OP, just because someone doesn't agree with you doesn't mean they should be dead? Wow, if you can't take the heat...get out of the kitchen!! You make claims, you better be prepared to back them up. But back them up with facts and be prepared for someone to try and debunk you!! If they can, you need to be receptive to the fact "you could be wrong". That is the FIRST thing in seeking the truth. If you can NOT accept the fact the you could be proven wrong, then it is NOT the truth you are after at all!!!! Which is it? You're right, it was an uncalled for comment, im just frustrated with the level of ignorance that people just accept what they are fed from the main stream media and do no research and dont even notice the differences in photos of 3 different plants.. then come here and say stupid shit to me when I have put the links up and proven what i say.. If i was wrong I would appologise.. and I do appologise for the comment.. however I am not wrong about the photos.. people have been lied to and deliberately had photos of the wrong plants paraded around to cause just this kind of confusion.. If they follow the links in order and look at them its easy to see which plant is which and what is where.. Hi OP, I may not be ready to go for your theory at the moment, but you have just earned my respect for admitting you were wrong in saying that!!! Kudos to you. A lot of things are said and misrepresented by the MSM, Gov, etc... of every Country on this planet and it takes people like us in GLP to put forth different views...may not always be right, but that is what free speech is all about. For the people that just come on and rant/rave...they don't even deserve a reply, so don't...just carry on. Good Luck. Kind Regards, Dan |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1285858 United States 03/25/2011 01:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ok have not been through eight pages but did really examine the two pics you posted on page one. I went back and forth several times and looked at all the minute details and from what I can tell, because they are at different angles, the parked cars on the hill, 10 of them I counted are the same on both pics. Lined up towards the front of the bldg. Now toward the dead center there are two lone trees before the cluster starts. In both pics they are there. With the smoke hindering the rest of the view cant make out the cluster. Looking at vegetation all around hard to tell except on the hill. Looks in both pics to be the same. There is a radio tower looking thing that has trees around it. If facing the plant it is the first one. In both pics it has some trees around it. Both pics look to be the same. Also from what I can see from both pics are that they were not taken on the same day obviously. Im not saying at all that there might be a lot of tampering with the pics. Or that you are on to something. I just from those two pics can't see it. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1296389 United States 03/25/2011 01:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ok so Im going to recap and debunk all your excuses in one thread as my answers are hard to find so here it all is for you in one go.. Quoting: EW 13080171. There are THREE (3) maybe (4)nuke plants that have been affected. Before you start spouting off about things make sure you have your own facts right first. Plant One: Fukushima I Dai-Ichi (6 reactors) [link to en.wikipedia.org] [link to 3.bp.blogspot.com] Plant Two: Fukushima II (4 reactors) [link to en.wikipedia.org] [link to 1.bp.blogspot.com] Plant Three: Onagawa, Sendai (1 reactor) [link to en.wikipedia.org] [link to www.fepc.or.jp] Hirono oil-fired power station [link to picasaweb.google.com (secure)] The videos and pictures below you have been shown, saying its fukushima is actually a mix of all of the above 4. The vid of the one being flooded is the Hirono Oil fired power station and NOT any of the nuclear plants at fukushima [link to www.youtube.com] Now I gave the first link of the before and afters on abc here [link to www.abc.net.au] Go to page one photo 6.. i used my zoom tool to 200% and in the top right corner you can clearly see cars parked in the car park.. as stated it was a 45ft tsunami, no way that tsunami left those cars parked on that ground. Now people said oh its on a hill.. wrong..thats onagawa. Yes Fuku I and Fuku II have hills AROUND them.. but NOT IN THE PLANT.. then they said, they drove in afterwards?.. ok 1% chance of that, but doubtful though i have to at least give that a % point. Then we argued about vegetation.. as you can clearly see in photo one on page two of the abc link.. [link to www.abc.net.au] This village near fukushima was totally wiped out.. how does a village a mile away get wiped out but the plant and the trees surrounding it stay intact when the trees on both sides of fukushima are wiped out.. MYTH BUSTED Then they said well what about the soccer field on page two of that abc link (photo 11 down) if they didnt move then why couldnt the cars at the plant not be moved. So I looked.. the reason those cars on that field are not moved is because the soccer field is ontop of a large hillside/small mountain.. The L shaped building at the nearly top left of photo is the soccer field [link to www.theage.com.au] Thats why those cars were not moved..they were ABOVE the tsunami.. MYTH BUSTED.. Then I was told that the SEA WALL at fukushima saved it from some damage.. ok so I checked.. you tell me.. 5.7meter wall vs 14meter tsunami?.. I dont think so tim! [link to wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com] MYTH BUSTED I do not know what is going on.. I only know they are using 4 different plants and making it sound like its all ONE plant.. they are mixing and confusing photos on purpose.. Something is up.. and i am fairly sure that this is mankinds greatest disaster.. not a soul on earth is going to get away from this. Now anything else you would like to try to throw at me? Because the town was built in a valley at sea level while the plant and support buildings were build into a hill an and elevation. The areas of the plant at sea level were destroyed, the rest survived. End of your Bullshit story!!!! :bs: :bs: :bs: |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1141935 Canada 03/25/2011 01:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I would ask you though how do you think those cars defied the tsunami and remained in their car spaces as the water washed over them?? Quoting: EW 1308017Exactly... There was no destruction at all visible before the plant exploded... V and "the event" both had plotlines about nuke plant "meltdowns" within one week of the Jap. quake. Then watched SGU and bam, they get exposed to a lethal dose of radiation. Also, the revelation about Atlantis being burried by a Tsunami in the same week too. I think HAARP did the quake and stuxnet did the meltdowns. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1222163 Canada 03/25/2011 01:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
EW (OP) User ID: 1308017 Australia 03/25/2011 01:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The BIGGEST problem with all this is the fact that they are using FOUR different locations and CONFUSING YOU all with them, trying to make out they are all the ONE place and they are NOT.. please take the time to realise this.. take the time to look at that fact alone before you talk about elevation and hills etc.. Ok off to answer the questions will post when ive found them all |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1224842 United States 03/25/2011 01:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Stop grabbing at straws.....all of you. There is not one camera, photog, producer, lighting equip or computer graphic that could have caused this much damage. This is mother nature at her worst....so please stop trying to make a conspiracy out of this. If you think this is so unbelieveable, just wait....you ain't seen nothing yet. This is child's play compared to what we will be dealing with the next few years....... |
El Quisqueyano User ID: 1313761 United States 03/25/2011 01:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | so why does the "Soccer field in Minamisanriku" picture have an "SOS" and then an "H" in a circle on top of that soccer field after the tsunami but not before the tsunami???? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1313670go look: [link to www.abc.net.au] kind of like: sos help or sos H-bomb? what is that, why is it on the picture? wow!!!!!! wow wow!!! it says SOS H with a circle around the H! It means HELP |
frogs User ID: 1313784 United States 03/25/2011 01:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | To the best of my knowledge, this is a genuine radiation dispersal interpretation from England. [link to www.weatheronline.co.uk] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1294151 United States 03/25/2011 01:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Did you look at the photos I linked in this article??? Quoting: EW 1308017Did you look at this video? [link to www.youtube.com] Sorry to say it, a tsunami indeed hit Fukushima. Accept it that you were wrong, i can do it aswell. That's gotta be a mislabeled video..I thinks it's from before any wave hit. In the very beginning you can see the water just starting to recede, and on the ground starting around :24 in, there's absolutely no water on the ground around the plant...anywhere. Is there anybody on this forum who thinks the quakes might have damaged the facilities..? Its right after the wave hit you fucking idiot. You can see the wave going back out to sea away from the sea walls. Seriously the fucking shills are out in force, but it appears most on GLP are seeing thought this SHILL PSYOP to make us question reality. Reality is there is a full on meltdown taking place in multiple reactors at the Fukushima plant as we type. It appears a tsunami wave did hit the plant, albeit a smaller wave then other areas. THIS VIDEO PRETTY MUCH PUTS AND END TO THIS PIN AND OR THREAD. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1313484 United States 03/25/2011 01:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ok so Im going to recap and debunk all your excuses in one thread as my answers are hard to find so here it all is for you in one go.. Quoting: EW 13080171. There are THREE (3) maybe (4)nuke plants that have been affected. Before you start spouting off about things make sure you have your own facts right first. Plant One: Fukushima I Dai-Ichi (6 reactors) [link to en.wikipedia.org] [link to 3.bp.blogspot.com] Plant Two: Fukushima II (4 reactors) [link to en.wikipedia.org] [link to 1.bp.blogspot.com] Plant Three: Onagawa, Sendai (1 reactor) [link to en.wikipedia.org] [link to www.fepc.or.jp] Hirono oil-fired power station [link to picasaweb.google.com (secure)] The videos and pictures below you have been shown, saying its fukushima is actually a mix of all of the above 4. The vid of the one being flooded is the Hirono Oil fired power station and NOT any of the nuclear plants at fukushima [link to www.youtube.com] Now I gave the first link of the before and afters on abc here [link to www.abc.net.au] Go to page one photo 6.. i used my zoom tool to 200% and in the top right corner you can clearly see cars parked in the car park.. as stated it was a 45ft tsunami, no way that tsunami left those cars parked on that ground. Now people said oh its on a hill.. wrong..thats onagawa. Yes Fuku I and Fuku II have hills AROUND them.. but NOT IN THE PLANT.. then they said, they drove in afterwards?.. ok 1% chance of that, but doubtful though i have to at least give that a % point. Then we argued about vegetation.. as you can clearly see in photo one on page two of the abc link.. [link to www.abc.net.au] This village near fukushima was totally wiped out.. how does a village a mile away get wiped out but the plant and the trees surrounding it stay intact when the trees on both sides of fukushima are wiped out.. MYTH BUSTED Then they said well what about the soccer field on page two of that abc link (photo 11 down) if they didnt move then why couldnt the cars at the plant not be moved. So I looked.. the reason those cars on that field are not moved is because the soccer field is ontop of a large hillside/small mountain.. The L shaped building at the nearly top left of photo is the soccer field [link to www.theage.com.au] Thats why those cars were not moved..they were ABOVE the tsunami.. MYTH BUSTED.. Then I was told that the SEA WALL at fukushima saved it from some damage.. ok so I checked.. you tell me.. 5.7meter wall vs 14meter tsunami?.. I dont think so tim! [link to wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com] MYTH BUSTED I do not know what is going on.. I only know they are using 4 different plants and making it sound like its all ONE plant.. they are mixing and confusing photos on purpose.. Something is up.. and i am fairly sure that this is mankinds greatest disaster.. not a soul on earth is going to get away from this. Now anything else you would like to try to throw at me? Because the town was built in a valley at sea level while the plant and support buildings were build into a hill an and elevation. The areas of the plant at sea level were destroyed, the rest survived. End of your Bullshit story!!!! :bs: :bs: :bs: and, furthermore, OP has a lot of photos; but there are also a lot of locations: there are 2 Fukushima nuclear reactor sites (Dai-Ni and Dai-ichi) 50 km. apart. and Sendai is a city 50 km further north from Fukushima Dai-Ni reactor plant. so, how might all these photos be all mixed up in all these names and locations? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1293674 United States 03/25/2011 01:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I see the shills are trying to play the "elevation" game, as though the Fukushima buildings and parking lot were too high above sea level to be impacted! How could an approximately 45 foot (14 Meters) tsunami wave NOT get to the parking lot and surrounding trees, etc.??? C'mon shills, BS my 45 ft. figures, then read this, from TEPCO themselves (March 23), the owners of these nuclear properties: Quoting: Mick 1212411wave height 45ft = 13.72m elevation car park on the right 29m on the left 25m OP can you please respond to that? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1143659 United States 03/25/2011 01:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I agree, no Tsunami hit Fukushima. Above deshaked video shows no evidence of a Tsunami. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1238809Stuxnet caused the meltdown, soon in your neighborhood too. Of course a tsunami did hit the plant! All the surrounding coast was hit and the plant escaped? Some of the first photos clearly show the tsunami-ravaged areas in front of the reactor buildings. A good conspiracy theory must make sense, and what you say does only make sense if you willingly ignore REALITY. From what I understand, the Fukushima reactors (and possibly the plant) were somewhat protected by a levee/breaker wall; however, we were told that the tsunami breached it. That said, I would not expect as much tsunami damage to be evident at the plant. The problem, however, was the loss of power to the generators supplying power to the cooling pools and the core. When the backup generators were damaged, cooling stopped, and all hell eventually broke loose after the cooling pools boiled off. I'm pretty confident that we're not being told the full story; however, I'm not sure there's quite as grand a conspiracy as you theorize... |
Abe Sloan User ID: 1218784 United States 03/25/2011 01:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | THAT VIDEO IS SO FAKE! LOOK AT HOW THE CAMERA IS WOBBLING ALL OVER THE PLACE! IT'S AS IF THE FAKER DID IT ON PURPOSE SO AS TO SAY "TRY AND DEBUNK THIS BUT YOU CAN'T BECAUSE IT'S SHAKING AROUND SO MUCH THAT NOBODY CAN DISPROVE THIS!" |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1294151 United States 03/25/2011 01:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | THAT VIDEO IS SO FAKE! LOOK AT HOW THE CAMERA IS WOBBLING ALL OVER THE PLACE! IT'S AS IF THE FAKER DID IT ON PURPOSE SO AS TO SAY "TRY AND DEBUNK THIS BUT YOU CAN'T BECAUSE IT'S SHAKING AROUND SO MUCH THAT NOBODY CAN DISPROVE THIS!" Imagine riding in a helicopter with a pilot who's scared shitless because he's flying over 4 nuclear reactors in meltdown. You want him to hover like his filming a traffic jam? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1090614 United States 03/25/2011 01:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I see the shills are trying to play the "elevation" game, as though the Fukushima buildings and parking lot were too high above sea level to be impacted! How could an approximately 45 foot (14 Meters) tsunami wave NOT get to the parking lot and surrounding trees, etc.??? C'mon shills, BS my 45 ft. figures, then read this, from TEPCO themselves (March 23), the owners of these nuclear properties: Quoting: Mick 1212411wave height 45ft = 13.72m elevation car park on the right 29m on the left 25m OP can you please respond to that? Of course he cant.... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1313818 United States 03/25/2011 01:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 917109 United States 03/25/2011 01:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
MG-42 User ID: 1313664 Canada 03/25/2011 01:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | WOW, the shills even shilled this thread to death aswell! Great Job OP! Especially on the cars! 5/5 No New World Order, only a New World of Brotherhood and Unity. 'The workers have to rebel against their masters, and to become masters of themselves. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains' Education is a RIGHT, NOT a privilege No one deserves privileges, we ALL deserve rights! A privilege means that some one is better than you. Which is NOT CORRECT. We ALL breath the same air, we ALL share the same Earth. ONLY Brotherhood and Unity We ALL bleed RED. Thread: The real facts about your leaders / The Fascist NWO agenda Thread: NATO funded neo-Nazi's during Yugoslav Civil War/breakup of Yugoslavia Thread: NATO symbol is the Swastika/National Socialist Empire Thread: the Doppler Effect, the spirals, and Nibiru |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1313670 United States 03/25/2011 01:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | i think they were enriching uranium for Israel and either something went wrong or they were about to get caught so they blew up the plants where they were doing the enriching then the quake was created (HAARP or underwater nuke) to explain the damage to the nuke plants and probably where they were doing the enriching is not the four plants where we are supposedly having a meltdown -- though something is melting down somewhere, i am sure. |