Page 1 Previous Page Next Page |
|
HUBBLE SCANS FOR MOON BASE LOCATIONS |
Anonymous Coward 08/22/2005 09:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | HUBBLE SCANS FOR MOON BASE LOCATIONS I thought hubble could see suck things on the moon... 50 meters? what about those lunar rovers? [ link to www.newscientistspace.com] Hubble scans for Moon base locations Planetary scientists are using the Hubble Space Telescope to scout out sites for potential human bases on the Moon. Previous missions have observed the Moon at a range of wavelengths. But none have boasted Hubbleīs sharp resolution at ultraviolet wavelengths - it can identify spectral features just 50 metres across over swathes of lunar terrain. "Weīre trying to ascertain the potential of ultraviolet spectra for indicating lunar resources," says Bruce Hapke, a planetary scientist at the University of Pittsburgh in Pennsylvania, US. He is one of a team of six researchers led by NASAīs chief scientist, Jim Garvin, who works on Hubble. In particular, the team hopes to be able to identify a mineral called ilmenite - or iron titanium oxide - which has previously been found in lunar soil samples. "It has properties which would be useful in constructing a lunar base," Hapke told New Scientist. |
|
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: HUBBLE SCANS FOR MOON BASE LOCATIONS If those lunar rovers were over 50 meters long Hubble could probably see them.
(Hint: They arenīt) |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: HUBBLE SCANS FOR MOON BASE LOCATIONS YOU CANT TELL EVERYONE WHAT WE DID DEAR. THIS IS NOW CLASSIFIED AS SECRET KY AND NOBODY CAN HEAR ABOUT THIS?!
& Do a web serch, and youīll find all the various bases up there. |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: HUBBLE SCANS FOR MOON BASE LOCATIONS Iīm probably wrong but didnīt they say Hubble couldnīt be used to look at the moon for some reason? |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: HUBBLE SCANS FOR MOON BASE LOCATIONS Iīm probably wrong but didnīt they say Hubble couldnīt be used to look at the moon for some reason? |
|
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: HUBBLE SCANS FOR MOON BASE LOCATIONS |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: HUBBLE SCANS FOR MOON BASE LOCATIONS I thought hubble could see suck things on the moon... 50 meters?<<< wtf is a suck thing? wait, donīt answer that. I donīt want to know. |
Kreeper 12/08/2005 10:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: HUBBLE SCANS FOR MOON BASE LOCATIONS "Iīm probably wrong but didnīt they say Hubble couldnīt be used to look at the moon for some reason?"
Yeah, I thought that back when they wanted to get a closer look at the Cydonia on Mars they claimed that they couldnīt do it. If I remember correctly, the "official" story was that things as close as Mars and the moon were too bright and would damage Hubble. |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: HUBBLE SCANS FOR MOON BASE LOCATIONS I understood it was to bright to view? |
|
Warrior Senz 12/08/2005 10:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: HUBBLE SCANS FOR MOON BASE LOCATIONS Just goes to show how stupid people in power are...I mean, it is really hard to keep all the secrets organized. Now that theyīve messed up and said the Hubble CAN see objects on the moon, then they should come clean on this little past lie and show us the lunar vehicles from the Apollo mission and have a look at Cydonia and a hundred other anomalies. Well, some of us donīt need the "powers" to confirm what we already know. Sucks being them. |
nomuse (nli) 12/08/2005 10:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: HUBBLE SCANS FOR MOON BASE LOCATIONS Un huh. I can see San Francisco from my building. I canīt see any people, though. Does that mean San Francisco is deserted?
(Hint -- my building is near the Oakland border). |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: HUBBLE SCANS FOR MOON BASE LOCATIONS They are using Hubble to view the moon in the ultraviolet range of the spectrum, not visible light, so no it is no longer too bright. |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: HUBBLE SCANS FOR MOON BASE LOCATIONS Zidiot Thread.
Not a damned bit of sense in any of the conspiracy kooksī heads. |
|
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: HUBBLE SCANS FOR MOON BASE LOCATIONS Senz you naughty gurl! Wriggle that bum again and I shall smack it for you.. hehe |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: HUBBLE SCANS FOR MOON BASE LOCATIONS "Too bright" doesnīt make sense.
Hubble has and always takes a full spectral image. It is later filtered.
And I hope Iīm not the only one who thinks a 50m resolution at that distance, with that telescope...absolutely sucks. I could be totally wrong though, if someone with some good math skills could take a comparison image that would have a resolution greater than a relative 50m, thatīd be cool. |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: HUBBLE SCANS FOR MOON BASE LOCATIONS |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: HUBBLE SCANS FOR MOON BASE LOCATIONS
"All your moon bases belong to us..... Oh so they are going to mine energy on the moon. What is ther coal up there? They gonna rub two sticks together? Use boy scouts to attract lightning? No. Google it and see what they will be digging up for fuel. |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: HUBBLE SCANS FOR MOON BASE LOCATIONS 50 meters at the distance of the moon is about right for the Hubble. Keep in mind that everything else it usually images are galaxies. These are thousands of light years across. The benefit of Hubble is it doesnīt have any distortion from the atmosphere and can stay focused on one spot longer than any earth based scope. Hubble is not a big scope. Remember it had to fit within the shuttle cargo bay. There are bigger scopes on earth but again they move with the earth as it rotates and canīt focus in one spot as long as Hubble can. |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: HUBBLE SCANS FOR MOON BASE LOCATIONS And for the record, Hubbleīs view of Cydonia would be much worse. Itīs resolution at that distance might make out a bump on the planet but probably not even that. |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: HUBBLE SCANS FOR MOON BASE LOCATIONS Iīm thinking of sub-meter spy sats that weīve had for almost 2 decades in LEO...sure itīs thousands of timeīs further away, but Hubble is MASSIVE compared to any of those sats. |
nomuse (nli) 12/08/2005 10:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: HUBBLE SCANS FOR MOON BASE LOCATIONS
Roughly 1,000 times further away. At 11,110 kg, HST is not thousands of times more massive than a typical spy-sat. Spy-sats I donīt have at fingertips, but Envisat = 8,211 kg, Leasat = 7,711 kg, etc. Basically itīs a four-meter telescope in space, optimized for light collection, not resolution. |
Page 1 Previous Page Next Page |