breezy deleting valid questions ?
what a shame.
shows colors.
Quoting: Krispy71frankly, i was hoping the OP would ban you from this thread - after all, we all know your single point of view - you've been saying the same perspective over and over and over since like page 430 on the BEZERK thread.
I've stopped visiting the BEZERK thread because I am sick of seeing everyone's posts being 'interpreted' and 'filtered' into the 'augie is good' point of view.
If I want to know what dots you've connected, I would go to the BEZERK thread, which you hijacked long ago - but I don't - and if you start filling this thread with your mumbo jumbo then I will leave this thread also.
OP please just ban Krispy from this thread, and anyone who wants to follow her stuff can do so at BEZERK.
I am over this dutch new ager and her going nowhere psychobabble.
thank you
I agree with this. OH, PUHLEEEZE Don't let this thread get overtaken too.
I'm not quite sure why the group who still participate in the bezerk thread tolerate, or rather, seem to enjoy the "good doggie" (this I deem as correct, here's a smiley-face-flower-angel-kissy-grin-heart-for you) cheerleading or the "bad doggie" (no, no,
WE already decided this was wrong pages ago) structure, but they do.
However, when Nexuseditor started the "Briefcase" thread and openly stated that posts that were way off point would be deleted at will, it kept the info concise AND CURRENT and retained "ownership". I think that is a good model.
I'm not saying I'm defensive if someone wants or needs to point to areas to better refine research or hone results. That's different. We're not all privy to the info you guys work from. However, it would be nice to have a working thread so that your main "team" can continue brainstorming
visibly - so that those of us who mainly lurk and search, (but occasionally post findings) can do so.
Hope this makes sense....(My two cents only....mileage may vary).
