Smoke And Mirrors. Using Satire To Confuse and Dilute. SD Readers VS The Post And Email.

The article below was written in reference to this article which has been shown to be a spoof BUT still contained information which is found to be accurate. So, in grand style, the use of false info mixed with true info to confuse and demoralize continues.

San Diego Article [link to www.sandiegoreader.com]

[link to www.thepostemail.com]


Third Update: Even High School Students Declare Obama’s Birth Certificate a Forgery?

THE KIDS WERE NEVER ASKED, ACCORDING TO NEWSPAPER’S RECEPTIONIST

by Sharon Rondeau

(May 12, 2011) — Update, May 13, 1:30 p.m. EDT: Channel 6 News in San Diego reported on May 10 that Obama opted not to speak at the High Tech High commencement mentioned in this report. Could that be why the “satire” piece was published on May 11?

One of the high schools where Obama will speak is in Memphis, TN. The Washington Post reported in March that “The White House did not receive enough applicants in a contest it launched for schools to win a commencement address by…Obama so it extended the deadline and made the application process easier.”

How much easier did it become?

Update, May 13, 2011, 12:24 p.m. EDT: A receptionist at the San Diego Reader has told The Post & Email that the story quoted from here is completely false. The Post & Email did not contend that the story was true, but rather, quoted from Mr. Mencken’s report. She stated that the names of the students were fabricated.

Whether or not High Tech High is aware of the piece is still unknown.

The facts presented here outside of the Mencken piece are products of our own research and are well-documented.

In an article published today, The Post & Email has released details of a very similar scenario with a child who was born on August 4, 1961 and died August 5, 1961, the details of which have been completely verified to us. Therefore, the Mencken piece was a portend of our release of well-researched documentation about the plausibility of the reassignment of a formerly-used birth certificate number to Barack Hussein Obama. .........



The San Diego Reader is reporting that several students attending a school named High Tech High has declared the long-form birth certificate image released by the White House on April 27 “a Photoshop job, and not even a particularly careful one.”

Editor’s Note: Other experienced experts have reported the same finding......

The school which the students attended had been expecting Obama to speak at its commencement, according to the report. After analyzing the image, however, the chairperson of the commencement event stated, “now we have to disinvite America’s first black president and maybe get him kicked out of office, too.” The student then suggested that Donald Trump “fill in.” The chairperson’s position result from what he described as “Our commitment to ethics really sets us apart at High Tech High.”

The students who declared Obama’s document a forgery likened the situation to that of former CBS anchor Dan Rather during the 2004 presidential election campaign, when “the fallout was enough to take down Rather, and the whole mess probably helped Bush win in ’04.” Forged documents were at the heart of the “Killian controversy” which ended Rather’s 43-year career at CBS.

One of the technical students stated that after confirming the image a forgery, they “did a little followup work” and found a child born in “the same hospital” on with a death certificate dated August 5, 1961. As the student described it, the date of birth of the child, Herbert Harrison O’Brien, was given as August 4, 1961 on the death certificate, but there was no birth certificate bearing his name. Obama’s purported birth date at Kapiolani Medical Center was August 4, 1961.

In acknowledging that the Mencken piece is false, the San Diego Reader has shown that it is aware of the possibility that the image presented to the public on April 27 is forged based on the examinations of numerous graphics experts, some of whom have identified “kerning” which was not possible on a manual typewriter in 1961.

There has been speculation that the birth certificate of a deceased person was used to manufacture any documentation Obama might produce.

One television station’s website has already removed its coverage of the release of Obama’s purported long-form birth certificate.....

What will these organizations say now that it appears that the birth certificate of a child born on August 4, 1961 at Kapiolani Medical Center was used to create a birth record for Obama to attempt to prove that he was born in the United States so that he could continue his ruse of eligibility to occupy the White House? Are they guilty of forgery themselves? Did they invent the narrative which accompanied their reports to the public which insisted that Obama had been “Born in the U.S.A.?”

What did they know, and when did they know it?

Rest at link

Last Edited by Say_It_Loud on 05/13/2011 03:09 PM