Firstly, props for the length, clarity, and documentation to back up your thread of discourse. It,s clear you spent time putting together a palatable document that would keep the critical reader involved.

Secondly, there is just a little too much smoke around many of the points you,ve taken up for there NOT to be some kind of fire.

Those points being made, we stil have to acknowledge that there is no clear, independantly verifiable proof of extraterrestrial involvement concerning the ideas and quoted "facts" that you are relating. There are compelling suppositions and arguments, but science demands rigorous and critical observational techniques, none of which have been exhausted yet.

For something as big and important as thisto be embraced worldwide would require a lot more than clues and hunches. Realists base their worldviews on more stable groundwork and factual evidence than hearsay and fearful whispers of dreaded overlords from a catastrophe-causing planet.