LARGE CLASS IN UNIVERSITIES: OUTDATED, AUTHORITARIAN! | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1405130 ![]() 05/29/2011 03:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
StrataFire User ID: 292694 ![]() 05/29/2011 04:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Interesting that you arrive upon the same conclusions that I have (and others of like mind).. Individuality, is a natural outgrowth of the need to "expand" as a individual, many roads in society nowadays, lead to limited opportunism, and to settling for "below par" working environments.. A University, has always been set up to work a collective agency in shaping a groups mentality to the benefits of the generous "contributors" of the Corporate/Government varieties, while leaving very little (if any) room for private venture firms needs in Academic requirements.. I discovered Quantified Infinity (QI) not (ironically) due to my University training, but rather "in spite" of the training, and actually quite counter intuitive to what one would expect from such an exorbitant amount of funds and personal "life" sacrificed for such a small piece of meaningless paper, that has more value as fire starting material, then it does as a worthy pursuit of my early years.. QI is a direct result of being "individuated" in spite of my best efforts to disprove it, and it shows that the real secret is "individuality" regardless of surrounding elements the observed element(s) are found in by the observer.. QI is all about being individuated, while in the same moment, being able to still communicate "precisely" with another, the exact meaning as intended (if QI is applied) .. As a technological direction, it allows for simultaneous order and chaos to work separate processes, yet remain conjoined as a single process, thereby reinforcing "individuality" within what would appear as a "group mentality" based operation (the results is infinite storage/memory/processing/transfer speeds, of infinite variability in application). Point of this long winded diatribe, is to finalized by saying simply: "I agree with you".. as my results tend to validate your theoretical direction & observations.. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1405522 ![]() 05/29/2011 07:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The relations between human beings are set up by spending attention. Spending attention feeds the mood. Wo spend attention to whom is the clue of the matter. The answer of this question set up the ranking that counts. Purpose to rule the question who has anything to say to solve a ongoing calamity. Is altough the line to pass information. The way attention creates ranking is invariable for us. The objects of attention vary. More hair or more individuality - the way you spend attention and set up the Herd does not depend on that. If in history people has weightend the question to whom or to what spending attention more in pursuing a common goal - that has not nullyfied their distinction of making a ranking who serves this goal best. If people these days weight more their own interest (if it were their own and not accidentially the aim of nearby everyone) then they are doing that in the same way as the anchestors did. Attention to those who can do the job best. So, the best education system will be if those who have anything to say get listen to. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1372516 ![]() 05/29/2011 07:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
jellybean224 User ID: 967614 ![]() 05/29/2011 01:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There are some great thoughts on this thread, which have caused a revelation regarding past experience of the regimentation and authoritarianism of private schooling. It is a little shocking that the experience of individuality as the enemy to authoritarianism would be so much more pronounced in a catholic school, since logic would seem to suggest that it would be the state-run schools that would have more to gain from the process. However, please return, OP and others, and expand on the subject if you would. I'd love to read more of what you have to say. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1403016 ![]() 05/29/2011 02:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | LARGE CLASS IN UNIVERSITIES: OUTDATED, AUTHORITARIAN! Quoting: ErleErle Frayne D. Argonza It’s late afternoon as I write this piece, and it’s the longest day in the northern hemisphere too (summer solstice). I will devote this piece to the matter of large university classes that are the mode of instruction in many academic institutions across the globe. Large classes are a thing of the past. The large class modality was referred to as ‘Great Man pedagogy’ in Europe, and was critically challenged by the youth and professors during the stormy youth heydays of the 1960s and ‘70s. The human psyche is rapidly evolving towards greater individuation. As we humans become more individuated, the educational instruction fit for us is one that should account for and enable our individuality, even up to the point of providing ample space for eccentricity in each one. In the olden days, when the Herd Mind or folk mind was the characteristic psyche of the people, the modality of instructions was one that would fit them well. Large classes evoked the ‘Herd instinct’ (Nietszchean label for the same), and unconsciously provided a semblance of community for peoples of those ancient times who were cut off from family & village to study in the university. The coming of the Industrial Age, right after the conclusion of the 30 Years War (1618-48), ushered the ‘assembly line’ of mass production of articles of manufactures. The ‘assembly line’ method found its concomitant equivalent in the Great Man pedagogy which churned out collegiate graduates like commodities for sale in a rapidly expanding labor market. Up until the late 19th century, during the Victorian Era that is the nadir of the modern age, Great Man pedagogy was a largely unquestioned modality of instruction. As the crisis of the early 20th century set in, the same pedagogy found perfect compatibility with the nascent totalitarian ideologies and systems of that era (fascism, Nazism, communism). Indubitably, the success of ‘assembly line’ classes was effective only insofar as the psyche remained as more folk-mind or herd-oriented. As the psyche mutates to more individuated type, it will militate against anything that brings it back to the Herd: subject to manipulation and shaping by authoritarian if not sociopathic interest groups and persons. Sure enough, as the youth rebellion of the 60s set in, the students of the Sorbonne in Paris burst out in revolt against the Great Man pedagogy circa 1968. Other universities quickly caught up the fiery flames of the revolt and followed suit in a tempo of upheavals that were largely unplanned and spontaneous. Accustomed to bureaucratism and pork barrel largesse that went with mainstream political power, the French Communist Party was caught flat-footed by that revolt. Tailing behind the event that indicated its being mired in intellectual bankruptcy and betrayed its archaic mindset, the communists lose relevance almost overnight. Had the communists grasped that event quickly and seized the opportunity by siding with the anti-large class youth, the sociopolitical landscape of France and Europe could have changed forever. A social revolution of a new kind, bred by a fusion of working class militancy and youth revulsion against archaic pedagogy and culture, could have been registered in the annals of history as worth our positive valuation. It is shocking to find out that the large class modality is still around with us today. It is anathema to the goal of human liberation, even as it could be a launching ground to breed new ‘boot camp’ babies for certain interest groups of a fascistic/authoritarian nature. The Industrial Age had now passed away, and the Post-Industrial/Postmodern Age has brought along with it an erasure (sous rapture) of the dividing line between Reason and Madness. Fascism is resurgent worldwide, and before we’d notice it a global state would be in the offing that is orchestrated by an ideological force of global Bonaparte. If the large class modality is re-introduced in any university whatsoever, it should only be on an interim phase. It is a regressive move, and running counter to the gamut of psychical individuation, it will erode in time and be abolished across the globe. Should there be a youth revolt against this antiquated pedagogy in my own home country, I will be glad to make my presence in the barricades to be set up. [Philippines, 21 June 2012] [See: IKONOKLAST: [link to erleargonza.blogspot.com,] UNLADTAU: [link to unladtau.wordpress.com,] COSMICBUHAY: [link to cosmicbuhay.blogspot.com,] BRIGHTWORLD: [link to erlefraynebrightworld.wordpress.com,] ARTBLOG: [link to erleargonza.wordpress.com,] ARGONZAPOEM: [link to argonzapoem.blogspot.com]] Great insight into the historical realities and failings of many educational system, as a means of harnessing the potentials of either individual or collective groups. The key problem is economic and political dogma(and a common held belief that things can be paired down to simple processes - to efficiently shape and mould rather than encourage and expand more lateral theories and forums of enlightenment and exchange. We have yet to truly wake up to the true potential of ourselves or the real benefits of enbracing our individual diversity in a collective sense |