Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,084 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 76,651
Pageviews Today: 321,461Threads Today: 108Posts Today: 2,283
03:24 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Post A Picture That 'Causes Emotional Distress' And You Could Face Jailtime In Tennessee

 
LadyLeo
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 853309
United States
06/08/2011 07:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Post A Picture That 'Causes Emotional Distress' And You Could Face Jailtime In Tennessee
Over the last few years, we've seen a troubling trend in various state laws which attempt to come up with ways to outlaw being a jerk online. Many of these are based on politicians and/or the public taking an emotional reaction to something bad happening after some does something online that angered someone else. Of course, while it would be nice if jerks would go away or jerky behavior would cease, that's just not realistic. The real issue is: how can it be constitutional to outlaw being a jerk? In many cases it raises serious First Amendment issues, among other things. The latest to jump into this game is the state of Tennessee, which apparently decided that just throwing people in jail for sharing music subscription passwords wasn't enough: now they want to put people in jail for "causing emotional distress" to others.

The specific law outlaws posting a photo online that causes "emotional distress" to someone and has no "legitimate purpose." While the law does state that there needs to be "malicious intent," it also includes a massive loophole, in that it says that you can still be liable if the person "reasonably should know" that the actions would "frighten, intimidate or cause emotional distress." Eugene Volokh notes all sorts of problems with this:

more [link to www.techdirt.com]





GLP