REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
Message Subject
|
*** Fukushima *** and other nuclear-----updates and links
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
Post Content
|
Environmental impact caused by the nuclear power accident at Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station As of April 19 [ link to www.jaif.or.jp] [snip] TEPCO released the result of their study for radioactive contamination on fishery products within a 20-kilometer radius of the plant. Levels of radioactive Cesium detected in fishes are below newly introduced standard for food products.~ OF COURSE they are... BWAHAHA. ~ Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1295673 I think this it is still amazing that the Fishes so close to the Plant are not more contaminated, less than 100Bq. a Kg. is something where we can see an end of the line, spec. when you know how much Uranium is inside of our Sea @ Daini, i think/ hope this is just a hunt for Publicity, we should give this Guy not toooooooo much credit for something unproven! Quoting: Atom-Boy Fishermen in disaster-stricken areas say life now far tougher than last year [ link to mainichi.jp] [snip] "I wonder how long this (voluntary ban) will continue," he said. "We may eventually have to stop fishing for other kinds of fish as well ..." In step with the government's new food safety standards that lowered the maximum allowable dose of radiation per kilogram of food from 500 becquerels to 100 becquerels, the Miyagi Prefectural Government in March increased the number of marine food samples subject to testing from last year's 20 per week to 100 per week.As a result, radioactive doses far exceeding the new limit were detected in four kinds of local fish, including sea bass, with the highest detected radiation dose of 360 becquerels per kilogram, and flounder, which had a maximum detected radiation dose of 400 becquerels per kilogram. The results led the Miyagi Prefectural Government and prefectural fishery cooperatives to institute a self-imposed ban on the fishing of all four kinds of fish this season at specified fishing grounds. ~ Makes you wonder what they'd have found last year with maximized testing, instead of 20 samples per week. ~ Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1295673 Tepco-boy said the fish weren't contaminated. ~ Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1295673 Honey Bunny Buggy-Chan, as far as i remember i exclude Groundfishes like that mentioned Flatfish!
So, please don't mix something up, mmmmkay?
Quoting: the average Atom-Boy I didn't mix it up. You are just confused in your lies... Better take better notes if you are going to call me out. You should know by now I'll pwn you, once again. ~ wb
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|