5.5 Earthquake Gulf of California. Upgraded to 5.9!!! | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1483733 Maldives 07/26/2011 04:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: NiNzrez ow... yap... my bad... |
Upsy Daisy User ID: 1457732 Poland 07/26/2011 04:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1369186Why are you cheering JUst because I live about 8.000 miles from California and there's absolutely no earthquakes in Brazil!!!! The EQ was Mexico not Cali Same plate line. . Yes ... What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1289877 United States 07/26/2011 04:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Upsy DaisyThe EQ was Mexico not Cali It's called the Gulf of California. I know that ELQ, just pointing out to Sul that it is not Cali, but 600+ miles away in Mexico. Oh OK. My bad. No it's not. It runs along the same plate line, with connected fault lines. [link to earthquake.usgs.gov] . |
Upsy Daisy User ID: 1457732 Poland 07/26/2011 04:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: El QuisqueyanoIt's called the Gulf of California. I know that ELQ, just pointing out to Sul that it is not Cali, but 600+ miles away in Mexico. Oh OK. My bad. No it's not. It runs along the same plate line, with connected fault lines. [link to earthquake.usgs.gov] . You keep pointing out the obvious, I merely made a point to the poster that thought the quake was in California, that the quake was not in California itself but 600 miles away in Mexico. What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1448330 United States 07/26/2011 04:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Little aftershocks... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1483470Tuesday July 26 2011, 19:43:51 UTC 74 seconds ago Central California 1.6 0.0 Detail Tuesday July 26 2011, 19:35:12 UTC 9 minutes ago Central California 1.0 0.7 Detail Tuesday July 26 2011, 19:04:33 UTC 40 minutes ago Northern California 1.0 2.6 Detail Tuesday July 26 2011, 19:03:51 UTC 41 minutes ago Northern California 1.0 2.4 Detail Tuesday July 26 2011, 19:03:09 UTC 41 minutes ago Northern California 2.3 2.0 Detail Tuesday July 26 2011, 18:32:09 UTC 72 minutes ago Southern California 1.3 11.1 Detail Tuesday July 26 2011, 18:31:50 UTC 73 minutes ago Southern California 1.6 16.1 Detail Tuesday July 26 2011, 18:13:47 UTC 91 minutes ago Southern California 1.0 15.6 Detail Tuesday July 26 2011, 17:44:21 UTC 2 hours ago Gulf of California 5.9 10.2 Detail [link to quakes.globalincidentmap.com] There have been swarms of quakes in CA for a few weeks. As stated, these are not aftershocks. Please pay attention to just northeast of San Diego. Many swarms since last week that are gaining in intensity. The entire plate is worrisome now, but watch these swarms. Quoting: jaymaj |
HarmonyH User ID: 1136718 United States 07/26/2011 04:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Little aftershocks... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1483470Tuesday July 26 2011, 19:43:51 UTC 74 seconds ago Central California 1.6 0.0 Detail Tuesday July 26 2011, 19:35:12 UTC 9 minutes ago Central California 1.0 0.7 Detail Tuesday July 26 2011, 19:04:33 UTC 40 minutes ago Northern California 1.0 2.6 Detail Tuesday July 26 2011, 19:03:51 UTC 41 minutes ago Northern California 1.0 2.4 Detail Tuesday July 26 2011, 19:03:09 UTC 41 minutes ago Northern California 2.3 2.0 Detail Tuesday July 26 2011, 18:32:09 UTC 72 minutes ago Southern California 1.3 11.1 Detail Tuesday July 26 2011, 18:31:50 UTC 73 minutes ago Southern California 1.6 16.1 Detail Tuesday July 26 2011, 18:13:47 UTC 91 minutes ago Southern California 1.0 15.6 Detail Tuesday July 26 2011, 17:44:21 UTC 2 hours ago Gulf of California 5.9 10.2 Detail [link to quakes.globalincidentmap.com] There have been swarms of quakes in CA for a few weeks. As stated, these are not aftershocks. Please pay attention to just northeast of San Diego. Many swarms since last week that are gaining in intensity. The entire plate is worrisome now, but watch these swarms. Quoting: jaymaj AGREE - like they are letting out STEAM ON PURPOSE !!!!! |
PAL User ID: 1483755 United States 07/26/2011 04:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Little aftershocks... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1483470Tuesday July 26 2011, 19:43:51 UTC 74 seconds ago Central California 1.6 0.0 Detail Tuesday July 26 2011, 19:35:12 UTC 9 minutes ago Central California 1.0 0.7 Detail Tuesday July 26 2011, 19:04:33 UTC 40 minutes ago Northern California 1.0 2.6 Detail Tuesday July 26 2011, 19:03:51 UTC 41 minutes ago Northern California 1.0 2.4 Detail Tuesday July 26 2011, 19:03:09 UTC 41 minutes ago Northern California 2.3 2.0 Detail Tuesday July 26 2011, 18:32:09 UTC 72 minutes ago Southern California 1.3 11.1 Detail Tuesday July 26 2011, 18:31:50 UTC 73 minutes ago Southern California 1.6 16.1 Detail Tuesday July 26 2011, 18:13:47 UTC 91 minutes ago Southern California 1.0 15.6 Detail Tuesday July 26 2011, 17:44:21 UTC 2 hours ago Gulf of California 5.9 10.2 Detail [link to quakes.globalincidentmap.com] There have been swarms of quakes in CA for a few weeks. As stated, these are not aftershocks. Please pay attention to just northeast of San Diego. Many swarms since last week that are gaining in intensity. The entire plate is worrisome now, but watch these swarms. Quoting: jaymaj Good Post Thanks |
Upsy Daisy User ID: 1457732 Poland 07/26/2011 04:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Salton Sea area is overdue a big one ( which I know is also connected to the Gulf system ). Danger is around every corner if this zone decides to kick off. There have been bigger quakes in the Gulf of late with no repercussions, but who knows when it will all kick off. What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1483733 Maldives 07/26/2011 04:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1426857 Slovenia 07/26/2011 04:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | USGS now reporter anoteher 5.0 [link to earthquake.usgs.gov] 5.9 4.3 and 5.0 for once and i still not sleep |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1479155 United States 07/26/2011 04:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1331430 United States 07/26/2011 04:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Another one just occurred. [link to earthquake.usgs.gov] Magnitude 5.0 Date-Time Tuesday, July 26, 2011 at 19:40:28 UTC Tuesday, July 26, 2011 at 01:40:28 PM at epicenter Location 25.051°N, 109.582°W Depth 12.5 km (7.8 miles) Region GULF OF CALIFORNIA Distances 101 km (63 miles) SW (218°) from Los Mochis, Sinaloa, Mexico 104 km (65 miles) SSW (204°) from Ahome, Sinaloa, Mexico 108 km (67 miles) SW (224°) from Juan José Ríos, Sinaloa, Mexico 1102 km (685 miles) SE (137°) from Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico And as the poster upthread pointed out, THIS IS HAPPENING 685 MILES SOUTH OF THE CALIFORNIA BORDER. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1448330 United States 07/26/2011 04:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Another one just occurred. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1331430[link to earthquake.usgs.gov] Magnitude 5.0 Date-Time Tuesday, July 26, 2011 at 19:40:28 UTC Tuesday, July 26, 2011 at 01:40:28 PM at epicenter Location 25.051°N, 109.582°W Depth 12.5 km (7.8 miles) Region GULF OF CALIFORNIA Distances 101 km (63 miles) SW (218°) from Los Mochis, Sinaloa, Mexico 104 km (65 miles) SSW (204°) from Ahome, Sinaloa, Mexico 108 km (67 miles) SW (224°) from Juan José Ríos, Sinaloa, Mexico 1102 km (685 miles) SE (137°) from Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico And as the poster upthread pointed out, THIS IS HAPPENING 685 MILES SOUTH OF THE CALIFORNIA BORDER. WATCH THE ENTIRE COAST NOW. WASHINGTON TO BAJA. *****BE PREPARED***** |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 297849 United States 07/26/2011 04:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1289877 United States 07/26/2011 04:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Upsy DaisyI know that ELQ, just pointing out to Sul that it is not Cali, but 600+ miles away in Mexico. Oh OK. My bad. No it's not. It runs along the same plate line, with connected fault lines. [link to earthquake.usgs.gov] . You keep pointing out the obvious, I merely made a point to the poster that thought the quake was in California, that the quake was not in California itself but 600 miles away in Mexico. I guess I should make my point more obvious. What I mean is it doesn't matter if the quake was 600 miles away. I live in So Cal and I have felt vibrations and quakes from Baja California Mexico (being on the same plate line and connected fault lines) so it's not so far fetched that this other poster in So Cal would get "feelings" from todays quake. |
NiNzrez User ID: 1135433 United States 07/26/2011 04:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | because the 5.9 was not the main quake we learn from the Japan 9.0 everyone made the mistake of thinking the 7.2 Japan quake on March 9th was the main quake and the 6.0, 6.2 and the 6.1 were all after shocks [link to www.emsc-csem.org] now click back a few pages to see wth led up to the 7.2 that led to the 6's that led to the 9 we see on: March 6th a 4.7, 5.1 and a 5.0 BONIN ISLANDS, JAPAN REGION, as well as two 4.8 March 7th, a 4.9, 5.0 RYUKYU ISLANDS, JAPAN March 8th, nothing over 4.5 March 9th 2011, 2 days before the 9.0, we saw in japan a 7.2 at 02:45 utc [link to www.emsc-csem.org] then on the same day at 18:16 utc there was a 6.0, a half hour later a 6.2, then a 6.1 2 1/2 hours later [link to www.emsc-csem.org] with a bunch of 4.5-5.9 between them all March 10th we then see a 4.9 OFF EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN then a 4.6, 4.8, 5.7, 4.9, 5.4, 5.3, 5.3, 4.7, with the last quake before the big 9.0 being 2011-03-10 22:44:25.0 38.85 N 143.07 E 30 mb 5.0 OFF EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN nothing at all for that region for the next 6hrs then 2011-03-11 05:46:23.0 38.30 N 142.50 E 22 Mw 9.0 NEAR EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN my point with throwing all this out there is that we need to stay alert to all these quakes and not assume that just because a quake might look big to us, like a 7.2 and assuming all following quakes being aftershocks there are still bigger quakes and it all depends on how fragile the crust is in that paticular region Join Me On The GLP SOLAR WATCH Thread Thread: SOLAR WATCH * Huge X8.2 Flare Sept. 10, 2017! (Updated Daily) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1483771 United States 07/26/2011 04:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1297814 Germany 07/26/2011 04:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | and the 4.3 is not an after shock Quoting: NiNzrezbecause the 5.9 was not the main quake we learn from the Japan 9.0 everyone made the mistake of thinking the 7.2 Japan quake on March 9th was the main quake and the 6.0, 6.2 and the 6.1 were all after shocks [link to www.emsc-csem.org] now click back a few pages to see wth led up to the 7.2 that led to the 6's that led to the 9 we see on: March 6th a 4.7, 5.1 and a 5.0 BONIN ISLANDS, JAPAN REGION, as well as two 4.8 March 7th, a 4.9, 5.0 RYUKYU ISLANDS, JAPAN March 8th, nothing over 4.5 March 9th 2011, 2 days before the 9.0, we saw in japan a 7.2 at 02:45 utc [link to www.emsc-csem.org] then on the same day at 18:16 utc there was a 6.0, a half hour later a 6.2, then a 6.1 2 1/2 hours later [link to www.emsc-csem.org] with a bunch of 4.5-5.9 between them all March 10th we then see a 4.9 OFF EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN then a 4.6, 4.8, 5.7, 4.9, 5.4, 5.3, 5.3, 4.7, with the last quake before the big 9.0 being 2011-03-10 22:44:25.0 38.85 N 143.07 E 30 mb 5.0 OFF EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN nothing at all for that region for the next 6hrs then 2011-03-11 05:46:23.0 38.30 N 142.50 E 22 Mw 9.0 NEAR EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN my point with throwing all this out there is that we need to stay alert to all these quakes and not assume that just because a quake might look big to us, like a 7.2 and assuming all following quakes being aftershocks there are still bigger quakes and it all depends on how fragile the crust is in that paticular region word!!! |
Upsy Daisy User ID: 1457732 Poland 07/26/2011 04:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I guess I should make my point more obvious. What I mean is it doesn't matter if the quake was 600 miles away. I live in So Cal and I have felt vibrations and quakes from Baja California Mexico (being on the same plate line and connected fault lines) so it's not so far fetched that this other poster in So Cal would get "feelings" from todays quake. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1289877Back at ya. What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1483470 Brazil 07/26/2011 04:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | and the 4.3 is not an after shock Quoting: NiNzrezbecause the 5.9 was not the main quake we learn from the Japan 9.0 everyone made the mistake of thinking the 7.2 Japan quake on March 9th was the main quake and the 6.0, 6.2 and the 6.1 were all after shocks [link to www.emsc-csem.org] now click back a few pages to see wth led up to the 7.2 that led to the 6's that led to the 9 we see on: March 6th a 4.7, 5.1 and a 5.0 BONIN ISLANDS, JAPAN REGION, as well as two 4.8 March 7th, a 4.9, 5.0 RYUKYU ISLANDS, JAPAN March 8th, nothing over 4.5 March 9th 2011, 2 days before the 9.0, we saw in japan a 7.2 at 02:45 utc [link to www.emsc-csem.org] then on the same day at 18:16 utc there was a 6.0, a half hour later a 6.2, then a 6.1 2 1/2 hours later [link to www.emsc-csem.org] with a bunch of 4.5-5.9 between them all March 10th we then see a 4.9 OFF EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN then a 4.6, 4.8, 5.7, 4.9, 5.4, 5.3, 5.3, 4.7, with the last quake before the big 9.0 being 2011-03-10 22:44:25.0 38.85 N 143.07 E 30 mb 5.0 OFF EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN nothing at all for that region for the next 6hrs then 2011-03-11 05:46:23.0 38.30 N 142.50 E 22 Mw 9.0 NEAR EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN my point with throwing all this out there is that we need to stay alert to all these quakes and not assume that just because a quake might look big to us, like a 7.2 and assuming all following quakes being aftershocks there are still bigger quakes and it all depends on how fragile the crust is in that paticular region cool stuff! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1479155 United States 07/26/2011 05:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1483779 United Kingdom 07/26/2011 05:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | and the 4.3 is not an after shock Quoting: NiNzrezbecause the 5.9 was not the main quake we learn from the Japan 9.0 everyone made the mistake of thinking the 7.2 Japan quake on March 9th was the main quake and the 6.0, 6.2 and the 6.1 were all after shocks [link to www.emsc-csem.org] now click back a few pages to see wth led up to the 7.2 that led to the 6's that led to the 9 we see on: March 6th a 4.7, 5.1 and a 5.0 BONIN ISLANDS, JAPAN REGION, as well as two 4.8 March 7th, a 4.9, 5.0 RYUKYU ISLANDS, JAPAN March 8th, nothing over 4.5 March 9th 2011, 2 days before the 9.0, we saw in japan a 7.2 at 02:45 utc [link to www.emsc-csem.org] then on the same day at 18:16 utc there was a 6.0, a half hour later a 6.2, then a 6.1 2 1/2 hours later [link to www.emsc-csem.org] with a bunch of 4.5-5.9 between them all March 10th we then see a 4.9 OFF EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN then a 4.6, 4.8, 5.7, 4.9, 5.4, 5.3, 5.3, 4.7, with the last quake before the big 9.0 being 2011-03-10 22:44:25.0 38.85 N 143.07 E 30 mb 5.0 OFF EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN nothing at all for that region for the next 6hrs then 2011-03-11 05:46:23.0 38.30 N 142.50 E 22 Mw 9.0 NEAR EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN my point with throwing all this out there is that we need to stay alert to all these quakes and not assume that just because a quake might look big to us, like a 7.2 and assuming all following quakes being aftershocks there are still bigger quakes and it all depends on how fragile the crust is in that paticular region CAUTION: NiNzrez is giving false information. |
.:*BettyButtercup*:. User ID: 1268232 United States 07/26/2011 05:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | look at this : [link to pasadena.wr.usgs.gov] click on todays date in different cities, will prove this: *effects from the mexico quake were registered all the way to the middle of california, maybe further! the really interesting areas are: ellis, mt.san jacinto, newberry springs(where the "volcano" is), pasadena, pardee, rancho palos verdes, salton city, and riverside. these places are all moving, shaking today. but usgs ignores these quakes? Last Edited by .:*Buttercup*:. on 07/26/2011 06:24 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1483779 United Kingdom 07/26/2011 05:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 2011-07-26 17:44:27.018min ago 25.21 N 109.62 W 60 5.5 GULF OF CALIFORNIA Quoting: El Quisqueyano[link to www.emsc-csem.org] Its called Operation Black Sunday by the military. They plan to underground nuke the New Madrid fault. On Sunday, July 31, 2011. Please spread the word. They are testing nukes on the Gulf of California. Probably you will see a 6+ earthquake in that area today! From here: Thread: ^^^^PIN^^^^ Latest solution to US Debt: Trigger New Madrid ^^^THISS |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1289877 United States 07/26/2011 05:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I guess I should make my point more obvious. What I mean is it doesn't matter if the quake was 600 miles away. I live in So Cal and I have felt vibrations and quakes from Baja California Mexico (being on the same plate line and connected fault lines) so it's not so far fetched that this other poster in So Cal would get "feelings" from todays quake. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1289877Back at ya. I think it's getting awfully close to time to move, though. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1464242 United States 07/26/2011 05:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | list of n. american quakes since july 19th..lots of little ones..especially round puerto rico b4 today's mexico/cali quakes |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1483791 Germany 07/26/2011 05:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1483683 United States 07/26/2011 05:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | what worries me about the gulf area is that they have been having bigger ones in the last few months or longer. 4's, 5's. Some would say this is good because it's releasing pressure. The way i see it is, if there is THAT much pressure going on that multiple 4's and 5's still haven't alleviated it and they still keep happening - there is something bigger brewing.... then again you can't ever make sense of it because quakes like Northridge just come out of the blue, no precursors. you got eye on one area and then another will catch you off guard. grrr |
fairflight User ID: 1071336 United States 07/26/2011 05:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 2011-07-26 17:44:27.018min ago 25.21 N 109.62 W 60 5.5 GULF OF CALIFORNIA Quoting: El Quisqueyano[link to www.emsc-csem.org] WoW!!! I missed this one until just now! That is about 1000 miles away from Los Angeles, where all those protected hollywood people are. I keep thinking that in time, that gulf there in Mexico and the gulf in the Puget Sound are going to rip open from one end to the other and become a new coastline. i'm in hollywood. what are protected hollywood people? LOL!!! El Q was saying earlier that many of these quakes are produced by man made device and they are trying to relieve the faults, the San Adreas especially, which are causing bigger quakes in other areas of the world. It means that the Hollywood stars and producers/big bucks, are being protected at the cost of others around the globe. Last Edited by fairflight on 07/26/2011 05:15 PM "Man was also in the beginning with God. Intelligence, or the light of truth, was not created or made, neither indeed can be. ALL truth is independent in that sphere in which God has placed it, to act for itself." |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1297814 Germany 07/26/2011 05:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Swarm of earthquakes rattles Gulf of California Swarm of earthquakes rattles Gulf of California with strongest recorded as 5.9 magnitude according to USGS with epicentre 86 km (53 miles) SW of Los Mochis, Sinaloa, Mexico at depth of 10.2 km (6.3 miles). Nine earthquakes was above magnitude 5. [link to thewatchers.adorraeli.com] The precursor signal for the 5.9 at Gulf of California can be seen as vertical lines at 1500utc. Notice at 1700utc 98Hz to 102Hz resonating signal comes on again and some more vertical precursor signals can be seen at about the same time |