NASA EXPOSED japanese moon lander sends back high def photos of apollo 15 Hoax landing site

German Coward 1492463, never argue with some one who has turned the caps lock on.

Why are you claiming that? Why are you making up facts?

The S-IVb is not a capsule, does not contain any cabin space, has no heat shield, can not enter atmosphere and was never designed to land on the Moon or anywhere else.

10 Meters, was it built in 1910 or about then?

By using all the NASA photo's a 3d model could be built without anything being up there at all, especially in low rez which is what 30 ft is. Have them take a pic of the earth and compare the cloud patterns on earth from a weather sat covering the same location and time.

So the good people at JAXA are part of the hoax conspiracy?
How big is this thing?

More accusations based on no evidence.


Your burden of proof.

You'd handwave it away anyway. Like all other evidence.
For years the hoaxies whined that only pictures from the surface would convince them.
When such pictures were made they moved their rocket-propelled goalposts to the other side of the planet.


Anyhoo, how do you know that that hasn't been done?
And you just never heard of it because, like all hoaxies, you refuse to study Apollo, and only ever "research" conspiracy sites.

"Projection".

No really. There's metric tonnes of evidence for the historicity of Apollo, no evidence what so ever for a hoax.
It's a religion, not an evidence based position.

Anyone with a brain stem can see the difference between those two sets and they are in no way identical. Lmao.

The only thing I find odd is that it looks like the picture was taken in the EXACT same spot.

I suppose through panning the camera and zooming in and out they could get the same shot... But it sure does look like a carbon copy location wise.

Werner Von Braun, said (3) Empire state buildings worth of fuel would be required to cruise the 250,000 miles to the moon.

But some government agency did it all within a 58' x 21' enclosure.

Did you read that book?
In that paragraph he describes a single stage from the Earth to the Moon's surface and back to Earth rocketship.
He shows that would be utterly impractical. (If using chemical rocket engines.)
In the next paragraphs he describes several profiles for staged rocketships that would work.

Nice example of reading something on a hoax site and then just believing it, without critical examination or any research.


"Some government agency" that actually employed Von Braun as their chief rocket designer.
"Some government agency" that used a staged rocketship to fly men to the Moon. It still needed to be a 100 metres tall.
Using a profile Von Braun hadn't thought of when he wrote his book, btw.

It wasn't the S-IVB that got them from Earth to the Moon, it got them from LEO to a lunar intersect trajectory.
How much delta-v did it have to provide for how much mass with how much fuel with what rocket engine?
With out an answer to this question you are just making an "argument" from incredulity.

Because they are the ones who TELL YOU WHAT THE TOPOGRAPHY IS MORONS. Of course they can match them.. as the image is coming from imagination. Lmao.

How do any of you know the topography of the fucking Moon? Are you serious? You would've either had to use their satellite images to prove your claim (biased), or you don't have a claim. And any biased source is not a source at all.

I know this is so funny.

Try reading the text and not just looking at pictures like a child.

That's what I got out of it too.

OP is a retard that didn't read his own posted article.

What a dope.

I'm not seeing in any way how this proves it's not a hoax? They create 3d visualisations of A SURFACE, not necessarily a lunar surface. Then all nasa has to do is match the picture.. This is hard to understand?

"Lunar intersect trajectory" or "trans lunar injection" is a NASA hoax.

If there was such a phenomenon, moon travel would be a weekly event.

Saturn V's stages got the rocket to only 118 miles altitude.

With today's staged rocket technology, we can now reach the ISS which hovers between 200 and 250 miles above the earth.
which is a great achievement.

They matched it in 1971.

Do they have a time machine?

Or did you now add the people working at JAXA to the millions required to hoax Apollo?



Proof it.


Proof it.


Proof it.

The S-VIb is a Saturn V stage.
Altitude isn't material, it is all about speed.
The Saturn V got the upper stage and CSM/LM into LEO, than the last stage was reignited and brought the CSM/LM up to speed towards the Moon

As Heinlein said LEO is halfway to anywhere in the solar system, it is all about the energy requirements.


"Hover"?

WTF is wrong with you?
Only PUNISHER says stupid things like that.



Last Edited by Halcyon Dayz, FCD on 01/09/2013 12:37 PM

i rate this thread optarded

Von Braun was talking about using the direct ascent method. They instead used multi-stage rockets and the lunar orbit rendezvous method.

you do realize that the resolution on cameras has improved 10,000 fold in the last 50 years dont you. Not everything is a conspiracy knucklehead.

This. They didn't want trashy remains around.

100%. Read "Kubrick's Odyssey" by Jay Weidner, it shows how they did it with Kubrick involved, confirmed by Kubrick's wife.

Laugh my ass off. You don't need an empire state building worth of fuel, and you won't be "cruising" to the moon. To GET to the moon, all that is required is to get to Earth's escape velocity and then COAST to the moon. To leave the moon would require about 1/6 as much fuel to leave the gravity of the moon.

How much fuel was required to launch the Voyagers? IIRC, they have already escaped the entire solar system. Were they powered by empire state building size rockets?

Last Edited by Bennder on 04/13/2019 01:51 PM

OP is right, liars gonna lie and sheep gonna sleep

Von Braun was specifically talking about a single stage to the lunar surface and back to earth rocketship.
It's him explaining why staging would be necessary.

Hoaxies of course never actually read the book, they just regurgitate the out-of-context quotes peddled by hoaxmongers.

Hoaxies are sheep, braindead sheep.

^ What he said. ^

Fakest B.S. I've ever seen. They take a zoomed in photo of a sidewalk and tell us it's "the plains of Jupiter" or "a dry lake bed on Mars" or some shit. Then [they] laugh when all the sheeple believe it.

It's all CGI, made-up math and "science," and the globe zombies eat it up.

And [they're] doing it at least in part to hide the fact that the Earth is flat, geocentric and enclosed.

Why do the NASA/globe lie pushers always seem to resort to personal attacks and insulting memes? It makes you look desperate.

I guess it's because you are desperate. People are waking up to the moon landing hoax/fake space/Flat Earth truth in droves.

The old illusions are crumbling.

Last Edited by New Atlantis on 04/13/2019 02:29 PM