Chemtrails back on in Detroit

As one who claims "chemtrails" are a fantasy, I have been called every name in the book while on this site...and I couldn't care less! Why am I able to take it without complaining?! If you don't respect me, why should you care what I call you?

I never asked you to interact with me on any occasion. In fact, I can't see any reason at all to interact with you, You provide no evidence and all you do when asked to provide some is say "Chemtrails are real". That's not evidence...that's opinion.

Just as you state above..."I pay attention plenty and know what chemtrails are and what contrails are."

That's OPINION based on ignorance. One can't tell from ground level that a trail isn't a contrail just by looking at it! You have a "belief" that you understand contrails, but you don't!

This is a good reason to call you a name...You are PRETENDING to understand the science enough to reject it in favor of the paranoid fantasy.

EVERY plane leaves water vapor as a byproduct of hydrocarbon combustion. It's the conditions of the atmosphere, in the area the plane is flying, that determines if the plane will:

*Leave no trail at all. "no trail" (the air is too dry or too warm)

*leave a short trail which disappears quickly. "normal contrail" (the air is cold, but not very humid so the air absorbs the water vapor)

*leave a segmented/dashed trail. "on/off chemtrail" (the plane is climbing or descending through layers/is at the edge of two layers of warm/cold and humid/dry air or is encountering pockets of differing air types.)


The rest are all referred to by chemtards as "chemtrails"

*Leave a long, long lasting pencil thin trail. (the air is very cold/humid and the winds are very calm)

*Leave a long, long lasting trail that fattens out a little (the air is very cold/humid and there is some air movement)

*Leave a long, long lasting trail that fattens out a LOT (the air is very cold/humid and there is MORE air movement)

*leave a long, long lasting trail that spreads out quite a bit and covers the sky (The air was already completely supersaturated and the added moisture created a layer of contrail cirrus)

" " = what chemtards call the trails

Of course, you will reject all of this because in YOUR "mind" you can look at a trail from the ground and "know" it contains chemicals. Sure ya can...

You've fallen for a hoax.

What do you call posting and questioning me when I post about chemtrails if it isn't looking for interaction with me?
Have you ever thought that maybe you are the one that has fallen for a hoax... (that said in a form of non question, just statement...)

Vt. . . .excellent thought and retort. . . .

Just because I comment on your ignorance...doesn't mean I want to have a conversation with you. To be honest, I really don't want to converse with any chemtards. All I'm here to do is ask them to post evidence to support their claims. They in turn refuse and start arguing with me. In very predictable ways.

And no, I haven't fallen for any hoax. The byproduct of hydrocarbon combustion is water vapor. That water vapor will react with atmospheric conditions in a VERY predictable way based on VERY basic science.

Not only that, I don't claim there are no "chemtrails", per se...I claim that there is no evidence to support the claims. There might very well BE "chemtrails"....It's just that the information provided AS evidence doesn't even come close to being anything of the sort.

I'll be honest with you...in particular. It's OBVIOUS that you have never studied the subjects that explain the trails in the sky. You're a poser...You pretend that you have enough education in these subjects and then you fail....miserably. Is that MY fault? Should I NOT point out your ignorance when you are potentially influencing others with that ignorance? Sorry...where I see the blind leading the blind...I point it out! Sorry if that offends you.

It's not my fault that I feel I owe it to my fellow man to post some truth when I see they are being influenced by bullshit.

If my use of bad words offends you...feel free to ignore me.

Aww...isn't that sweet...

You are spot on Vt! He doesn't actually know what is really going on.

LOL!

I know I know more about the trails in the sky than you will ever know.

Go have a drink....

Shut up Noble, you are making yourself look more stupid than you normally do.

btw, I wasn't referring to your beloved trails in the sky, you just thought I was because that's all you know.



Last Edited by Lotus Flower on 08/08/2011 01:07 PM

I will not shut up you paranoid drunk...

You have yet to provide evidence that you know more about anything than I do. You only "believe" you know what's "going on" based on your paranoid world view. Sorry, I don't buy into your doom and gloom.

BTW, I WAS referring to the trails in the sky..and don't give a shit what you were referring to. All that matters to me are the trails in the sky and the lies and nonsense being spread about them in an effort to vilify an industry.

good thread you started here nobel.

thanks.

Poor little trails.

wow. i've never heard anyone say the airlines are the issue here. is that the industry you're referencing? or the geoenginerring industry?

just asking.

Poor little (alcoholic) chemtards.

No.

The planes leaving the trails are commercial airplanes.

Nobody is "geoengineering". There are only proposals.

sure proposals.

[link to www.agriculturedefensecoalition.org]

Geoengineering Articles & General Information
Global Geoengineering Governance: Currently the U.S. Government, our military, NASA, NOAA (other U.S. agencies), any city, county, state, private indivduals, corporations, foreign governments, and foreign corporations, can initiate any type of geoengineering experiments without public knowledge, consent, government restrictions or public debate.

116 2010 U.S. House of Representatives and UK Parliament House of Commons Joint Statement on Geoengineering 2010.pdf

[link to www.agriculturedefensecoalition.org]

116 2010 House of Commons Fifth Report-Session 2009-2010 The Regulation of Geoengineering-Complete Report March 10, 2010.pdf

[link to www.agriculturedefensecoalition.org]

Please note that the testimony in both UK and U.S. hearings was highly limited and in most many cases. Almost the same cast of individuals testifed during these hearings. In most cases few were asked to testify that would oppose or questionsthese geoengineering schemes.

In addition, testimony was not requested from marine biologists, agriculture, foresty, EPA (with regard to toxic chemicals being used - Water, Soil & Air Pollution) NASA, NOAA, solar power producers, and a whole host of scientists in other fields. Thus, a full and complete discussion of the impacts was denied to those holding the hearings and the public. The potential for these geoeingeering schemes to have synergistic and cumulative effects is staggering.

Last Edited by Tiny Green on 08/08/2011 03:15 PM

I see no evidence to suggest that they have started any such thing.

You "believe" they have.

Also, there is no evidence that "geoengineering" has anything to do with the trails in the sky. It's just assumption and speculation.

The trails behave just like contrails.

By the way,. that website is a conspiracy site...and Rosalind Peterson is NOT educated in atmospheric science. She is educated in environmental science...she's a tree hugger who also happens to be a chemtard.

I'm from the Detroit area as well and can confirm that there was alot of chemtrail activity last Thursday night. I havn't seen alot of chemtrails up until then all summer long.

I was out having a baseball practice with my sons little league baseball team between 6 and 8 pm on thursday night. At the start of practice the skies were pretty clear with moderate cloud cover but by the end of practice there was chemtrails all over the place.

Nice contrails/spam

This thread still? Really?

My opinion, as the owner of the thread, is that it should go ahead and die. Nothing is getting accomplished here except insult slinging.

The issue "Fact or Fiction" will not be settled by any of you tards with the way you're all behaving.

Now run along. I don't want to have to use the rare "Lock Thread" feature.

Thank you.

Is there a lock thread feature available to any OP? . ..

It will never be settled no matter what....

i told ya pages ago OP!!!

this is what the contards do to these threads!!!

And you've been so helpful.

No, It's a Moderator Tool.