I am a member of an Elite Family who you despise...ask me a question

quote then you will suddenly see this fake reality of distraction melt away and you will be able to rise up to from where you fell off.quote
Oh my gawd, so the earth is flat!

All, Don't know if this guy is fake. But the real Illuminati insider who later converted to Christian faith spoke about these illiminati fuckturds 40 years ago. He said they are scared to death of the true believers of Christ because of their close connection to God.

He was soon incarcerated on false rape charge and assasinated in prison.

[link to www.kt70.com]

bwahahaha

I AM the mirror




Spelling like I/Outsider.

How's living on canned food and potato chips ?




What ?

=:D

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

You know, my judgment of this I/Outsider

was exclusively based on his internal self-contradictions, spelling errors and lack of general education in contrast to his claims to belong to a hyper-elite.

I have no investment in Christian evangelism of this type, but it has an interesting aspect:



Thank you, 793492.

The text writes:



Notice this part.

I am not buying into "Lucifer" necessarily denoting Satan or anything evil for that matter, as it mainly designated the planet Venus as the morning star before sun rise, as such merely a Roman version of Aphrodite, goddess of attraction, a personalization of libido-related motivations, you might say. And such worhip is therefore necessarily merely non-salvific as it represents refuge in impermanent wordly matters much like drinking beer or having sex. It becomes "demonic" only by attaching central, ultimate value to temporal matters instead of seeing them for what they are.

The point I am making here, however, is the simple fact that calling Jesus an imitator coincides with I/Outsider claiming much the same thing, that he was an imitator, a mere actor (a claim easy to debunk, BTW) in place of the real Christ.

So notice this view of Yeshua is

common to
1. John-Todd's report Illuminati
2. I/Outsider




Thread: I am a member of an Elite Family who you despise...ask me a question (Page 30)

the illiminati CREATED christianity so dont start with this they are scared of god bs. years ago in babylon they were known as the brotherhood, it's only in modern time they became known as the bavarian illiminati.

As I said before, I am not concerned with "Christianity".

Pay attention to the sweet spot that you are distracting from.

the illiminati CREATED christianity!
best one yet, kudos!

And Christ called them the "synogogue of satan".

They did not create Christianity, though I know that is the fashionable theory lately.

They didn't create God, sorry. Keep worshipping yourself instead of living the love that was God's intention. You are then one of them.
Humans CHOSE this earthly life. We WANTED the evil that was offered by the fallen ones. Don't blame God. He waits with patient love every day for each one of us to wake up. Many do, many don't.

Don't stress yourself out trying teach them that.

A lack of education will usually re-erect itself and justify that by itself.

Idiotic high school dropout drivel like the argumentation in "Zeitgeist" and the like will usually appeal to adolescents who are in dire need to a belief system which they think is opposing an established belief system.

Perhaps it is best to allow them to cling to that rather than leaving them completely without anything to grasp at.

Interesting that we in Europe don't have this phenomenon so much because since the secularization and subsequent technological advancement hardly anyone believes in traditional propositions of "christianity" anymore anyhow, so adolescents wouldn't think of opposing them in such an immature, ideological fashion.

Of course, "christianity" has been corrupt, especially since Constantine instrumentalized it as a political tool.

To deduce from this corrpution to its origins in such a self-assured manner, however, distinctly shows the mentioned lack of education.

But whatever, let them create their new myth. Below a certain level of maturity, people seem to need myths and ideological identifications on both pro and con sides.

No illuminati or any other secret order interested in power created that power of unconditional love that confronted the money changers and completely made his own body into "prasad" - not to atone for our sins (as the corrput version wants to have it),

but to facilitate mystical union between Him and us, the Divine within the (depths of the) body, now !

And I say this even though I am quite frank about being completely non-denominational or even pretty buddhist in my approach. Yet, Jesus was the only one of the highest realizers who radically rejected allegiance with power elite and the establishment and turned to the most lowly and dejected as His beloved. No secret elite would ever think of setting such an example in their own interest, and if you believe that count yourself stupid.

That itself sets him above all the other avatars to have ever walked the earth, at least in this respect.

The one thing that speaks against Yeshua is that he expected the soon to come Kingdom of God for all.

Actually he announced it was already here then, not in the future, but immediately:

Thread: ANYONE WITH INFO ON VERY BIZARRE HAPPENINGS IN EARLY NOVEMBER 2003 IN DALLAS/FORT WORTH TX PLEASE HELP!! (Page 39)

However, it was clear to him that this fact was not obvious for all, and his mistake was to believe that it would be pretty soon.

That was his one major mistake.

However, it doesn't make him a liar or a failure, only human since he clearly also said:

[link to www.biblegateway.com]

Note: "...nor the Son" !

So let's stop worrying about this, at least among those who realize the only God we need to be concerned with:

[link to www.biblegateway.com]

It is interesting to note, though, that the Zeitgeist people and the like want to make people believe that this is not the right "God". Contemplate the implications !

Gavno forum progeri popravte ekarnij babai.
Ramsha tava!
Insider po russian govorish?
Esli' eshe ho4esh dat' otveti.
To deistvuem.
Tyt ya ni4ego sprashivat' ne bydu, esli ti eshe tyt dai znak.
ya tebe ostavlu kontktnij po4ty, na skolko ya vijy libo tebya zdes net libo, prosto mol4ish.

:D That seems like an attempt to get the Insider talking again... Good luck with that!
I think he may easily speak russian, it is one of the world languages.

Glupo=) Ego name dazje svoboden....
His name was free)))

Last Edited by Insider on 10/25/2009 07:36 PM

no moget on odnagdy vernetsya. Hotya, moget emu prosto ne za4em k nam vozvrashatsya. Ili mi poka ne pridumali stoyashih voprosov. Vozmogno mi ne gotovi k ego prihodu.

Ti dumaesh on visit zdes 4 goda??? Tem bolee, shto forum otstoiniy : ) Vopros, a pochemu on voobshe zashel imenno suda????

Is your GOD EXTERNAL?

Then he's the Devil.

Remember to go within, and you'll realize that all the religions are telling you to worship an external deity.

God is just a WORD.

That's what you think and believe.

The problem is, you think God says what you're doing is ok.

Wrong!

God is just a WORD
No, it has become just a word!
The Logos (God ) is creating, is the breathing spirit, but we humans chose for degeneration and our words have become meaningless now, void. We lost the ability to create, while stuck in the process of adoring the flesh.
However it is coming back to us.
look and thou shallt find!

Dear Elite Family member,

Can you fly like Kevan's heroes? I want to learn to really bad. I dream of flying. Does your blue blood give you superpowers? If so can you teach us to fly, too?

Respectfully,
merely mortal

As I said before:



Case in point:



which is a pity since his other statement shows promise:



The truth, of course, is that "G_d" is neither of "within" or "without"

but first and foremost signifies the absence of reality in such a distinction.

Insofar as it therefore is also not confined to "within" it has a certain pedagogic justification to consider him as beyond your little self in the beginning.

The KJV does not have "nor the Son". KJV is based on trustworthy Textus Receptus source text. NIV is based on corrupt Alexandrian text. Alexandria, Egypt was a hot bet of gnostic and false teachings.

=======================================
Matthew 24:36 (King James Version)

36But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.


==================
Matthew 24:36 (New International Version)

The Day and Hour Unknown
36"No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son,[a] but only the Father.


Footnotes:
Matthew 24:36 Some manuscripts do not have nor the Son.
=======================

this logos666 shill is so obsessed with this insider guy, he keeps spamming and spamming with his bullshit which noone even reads anymore.

keeps checking it everyday to see how he can propagate his nonsense like an automated response, LOL.

and here comes another one :P

No need to expand.

Publication of Luther's translation is 77 years senior to KJV and concurs.

Nevertheless, the fact that even the son, as a man present among other men, does not know is implied in the same translation:



This clearly implies that even Jesus, insofar as he is a man, also could not know.

Now he may have known that in His Divine reality as the primordial Logos or whatever, but what he says is that it cannot be given to any individual under the limitations of being human, including himself-insofar-as-he-is-human. And this is exactly what concerns us here: his predictions for the soon by everyone to be discovered truth about the Kingdom (which incidentally has nothing to do with evangelical belief in it, but with its actual realization of it in your heartmind):

Any you should also be interested in understanding it this way, or else it would be a clear indication of Jesus having been deluded, and this BTW is precisely the grounds on which the Jews reject his Meshiach status to this day.

Note the performative self-contradiction.

Over time I am getting the impression that there is a couple of high school dropouts who specialize on 666-spamming, and because of a peculiar similarity in spelling mistakes to "I/Outsider" we must consider the possibility that this group is in fact identical with "I/Outsider" himself.

I am in fact going through 3 to 4 threads in a row regularly, simply because I have posted there before.

did anyone read the propaganda post of the automated responder logos666 filled with his own quotes and blablabla links?

lol.

totally obsessed with this thread to the point where it is now controlling his limited mental capabilities ;p

You're so stupid in your egoic attitude that you don't even READ YOUR OWN WORDS which are STILL externalizing "GOD".

If God is neither wihtin or without then GOD doesn't exist. Yet then you externalize and personify ("him") as if you don't even know what you really mean.

So if earth, space or the galaxy is neither north nor south,
they don't exist for similar reasons ?

If there is no ultimately real boundary between you and me then there is no boundlessness ?