So, 666, now you want to give us a lesson about how good is Christianity?

I thought you were more interested in spelling mistakes?

Also at least if you took the liberty to post some books I think I will post one.

Here, this is the book containing most of the questions and the answers insider gave, this thread was hacked and the posts were deleted but we kept it in PDF format to repost it, and we attracted a shill and a fanatic Christian along with it.

[link to www.4shared.com]

People please read that book first if you want to know what this thread is all about, because the posts were hacked and deleted years ago

Also I think I will repost something important about 666's enlightening posts,



I will give an example of each point by quotes from your own posts;

1. Providing certain books and videos that are supposed to portray the whole truth.

I highly recommend these three books by the contemporary catholic mystic Bernadette Roberts:

[link to www.amazon.com]

[link to www.amazon.com]

[link to www.amazon.com]

2. Using complex words to downtalk the "obtuse".

This logical fallacy is called "argumentum ad personam", even if it were true.

3. Putting too much space between the lines of a post and ending them with videos and unnecessary links,

This is a common technique to overwhelm the average poster.

After this new set of flatulent bowel movements









Perhaps it would hurt to humbly point out



what I was actually saying




without being really interested








in any psychpathology






from any direction:











uhm

lol also he misspelled the word psychpathology

4. Seeking agreement with any one who posts,

That makes you look overwhelmed.

Many have been "anointed".
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 594943


So you agree with me in disagreeing with "Insider".

5. Insulting people and ignoring posts that will make you either look ignorant or mistaken.

The more I experience peasants' reactions, the more I understand - not sympathize with - cruel elitists idea to simply kill most of them off.

he also tried to copy insider by using the word peasants.

as for number 6

6. Quoting and reposting you own posts,

it is too obvious without giving examples.

Also he pointed in one of his posts that he will soon “disengage” from the thread soon:

Given the level and emotionality of the replies, I will follow Insider's example and disengage from this thread soon

but yet he stayed flooding the thread with books and videos.

now i know this will show me as an immature person, but that was the technique 666 used to debunk the thread, i am merely giving him a dose from his own medicine.