You know, my judgment of this I/Outsider
was exclusively based on his internal self-contradictions, spelling errors and lack of general education in contrast to his claims to belong to a hyper-elite.
I have no investment in Christian evangelism of this type, but it has an interesting aspect:
All, Don't know if this guy is fake. But the real Illuminati insider who later converted to Christian faith spoke about these illiminati fuckturds 40 years ago. He said they are scared to death of the true believers of Christ because of their close connection to God.
He was soon incarcerated on false rape charge and assasinated in prison.
[
link to www.kt70.com]
Thank you, 793492.
The text writes:
NOW THIS WAS A SHOCKING THING TO ME SINCE I WAS RAISED TO BELIEVE THAT THE DEVIL DIDN'T EXIST. You see witches aren't Satanists, they don't believe in Satan, and I was quickly explained to that Lucifer was a good god and not an evil god, and that Jesus was the imitator. So I learned, and I learned many things, both of Witchcraft, and I also learned why the Senators and Politicians were there!
THEY WERE THERE BECAUSE WE WERE THE RELIGION OF A POLITICAL ORGANIZATION CALLED THE ILLUMINATI, and I was told all about the Illuminati and its history. I was schooled in the things that it had done, and the things that it was going to do, and the things that I was going to do.
Quoting: John Todd on the linkNotice
this part.
I am not buying into "Lucifer" necessarily denoting Satan or anything evil for that matter, as it mainly designated the planet Venus as the morning star before sun rise, as such merely a Roman version of Aphrodite, goddess of attraction, a personalization of libido-related motivations, you might say. And such worhip is therefore necessarily merely non-salvific as it represents refuge in impermanent wordly matters much like drinking beer or having sex. It becomes "demonic" only by attaching central, ultimate value to temporal matters instead of seeing them for what they are.
The point I am making here, however, is the simple fact that calling Jesus an imitator
coincides with I/Outsider claiming much the same thing, that he was an imitator, a mere actor (a claim easy to debunk, BTW) in place of the real Christ.
So notice this view of Yeshua is
common to
1. John-Todd's report
Illuminati2.
I/OutsiderLook, the point is quite simply this:
- Whatever is true about whatever I/Outsider said is an old hat. It is everywhere and out in the open.
- However, his stuff is mixed with misdirecting, ritualistic, elitist pre-rational, magic atavisms, and not because he is too stupid, but because
it is distraction, disinfo, cointel.
Please grow up.
Quoting: Logos666 792211
