I am a member of an Elite Family who you despise...ask me a question

and I will answer them in short.

Why?
Because I can.

Check for example the code snippet answer about underground chambers and the answer just beofre that, they just doesn match when you find the same answer on scribd document.

my only option left is Logos666

But to answer your question:

insofar as "Insider" is actually convinced of his own crap, it is just another playform of this kind of shit here:

Thread: An Overview of Freemasonry


Another way of saying this is to speak with St. Marshall:

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

"The medium is the message"

You see

as long as they can sell you the idea that the essential secrets are to be found outside of the depths of the here and now of your own body-mind (I don't mean the naive perception of the body-mind itself), but instead in some secret ritual or trick or special piece of information that they keep

it largely doesn't matter to them what that "secret" consists of, as long as you believe there is such a secret in the first place and run after it outside yourself.

The true secret is that there is no formal secret. It is what you truly are, but that has no form. And that truth has been out in the open for millennia.

They just want to distract you from that, and they grab you by your desire to avoid genuine true practice.

It is like

A: I've got the secret ! And it is this:... blabla A.
B: Well A's got it half right ! But the real truth is this:... blabla B.
C: I've been watching this too long, B's almost there, but the truth is: blabla C.
...
X: They've all got it partially right, but I've got the secret X, but I won't tell you.
Y: ....
...


As long as you keep chasing A,B,C,...,X,Y,Z,... they're happy !


But I keep telling them:



__________


What religious or ritualistic views you follow or reject almost doesn't really matter, except it matters that your own views are of no major concern to yourself:

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

As long as you actually practice finding out who and what and even if you are !

As a last sign (how repetitive) that I do not favor any particular religous view, I will reiterate a bunch of possible entry points for practice

[link to books.google.de]
[link to www.merrell-wolff.org]
[link to www.sriaurobindoashram.org]
[link to www.headless.org]
[link to www.headless.org]
[link to www.google.de]
[link to www.youtube.com]
[link to myajja.org]


Rip, shred and lacerate, but practice ! Time's running out.

[link to www.teachingsofthebuddha.com]

Mika:

Thread: HAS ANYONE READ THE Secret Teachings of All Ages by manly Hall (Page 5)

[link to www.scribd.com]

[link to www.4shared.com]

The video does not reply anything

An observation regarding his spelling errors. Asks an astute observer (page 16/17 in the script):


Q:
"And why do you misspell simple words such as 'malicious' ? I find that very intersting"

A:
"English is not my native language"


Given the many irrelevant questions he did not answer, he seems to feel the need to maintain the myth of his being an extremely educated person (as a bloodline-member would expeted to be).

Note, however, that the kind of misspelling he keeps repeating is

untypical of non-natives of the English language

and

highly typical of English native speakers.

For instance writing

"to" when it should be "too"

"their" when it should be "there"

and so on. This is indicative of a person who has primarily internalized English acustically and not visually and accompanied by reading - as non-natives would naturally study it.

For non-natives, these words stick out as very different from each other because they learn them accompanied with meaning and their scriptural appearance in conjunction with their phonetic value, and not years and years later to it.

I myself - as non-native to English - felt I could immediately pick out that the author must indeed be a native speaker of English - in contradiction to what he says.

Moreover, regardless of whether he is native to English or not, his spelling errors would hardly be so habitually committed by one as highly trained as a bloodline-member would be.

______________

Moreover, it seems his critique of religion, as much as it also says some truths, is a demonstration of a very superficial and uneducated approach to religion. He is unaware, for instance, that being christian does not imply the veneration of a human (even if you worship Jesus), nor does it even require viewing the historical person of Jesus as the object of veneration.

Glorious counter-example:

I highly recommend these three books by the contemporary catholic mystic Bernadette Roberts:

[link to www.amazon.com]

[link to www.amazon.com]

[link to www.amazon.com]

This stuff is even better than Meister Eckhart (and that means a lot).

Roberts openly admits that she was always intimately devoted to the Christ while having not too much to do with Jesus, and this is nothing revolutionary even within catholicism.

So why does "Insider" not know such basics and suggests a type of christianity exclusively prevalent in fundamentalist protestant USA ?

Then he goes on to suggest that the real Christ was another person in history, not Jesus, thus demonstrating his ignorance that "Christ" is not even considered a historical person in orthodox christianity, but a time transcending principle. No mystical christian with any profundity would assume that "Christ" would still mean "Jesus" other that the latter being a endearing reminder for the otherwise unimaginable "Christ".

Regarding a more esoteric, gnostic interpretation of what the "Christos" means regarding each of us, namely the connection to the light of our higher being beyond the psyche and the web of interconnection in light's regions,

and regarding a more detailed version of whatever truth "Insider" was speaking esoterically, I would like to recommend a pretty unknown master of the modern gnosis Ralph DeBit "Vitvan" who died in 1964, I believe:

[link to www.sno.org]

Sources such as this one and a few others would, BTW, be completely sufficient to create an air of superior knowledge if one were to play an impostor in a thread like this one and would expect no readers with much of an education or knowledge.

Note also that "Insider" simply assumes that to gain recognition must be any celebrity's motivation to be one, such as the Dalai Lama or Mahatma Gandhi. I find that to be a highly idiotic assumption, and one that often inverts and confuses cause and effect,

regardless of all the critical remarks that must be made regarding these two persons (and I particularly know a thing or two about the Tibetan scence after having interacted with high lamas for years), but I certainly do not believe that gaining recognition for himself is the Dalai Lama's motivation at all.

____________

Generally I do not understand why "Insider" suggests that the core truth of religions is so deeply buried in them among all the garbage that we can hardly find it.

I think a decade or two of comparative study, yoga and meditation will bring anyone with any intelligence left quickly to the core of all that without fail.

It is true, however, that the childlike intuition of the simplicity of it will be regularly obscured by dogmatic religions rather than revealed. And that only through profound contemplative, practical and logical (rather than literalistic, concept-attached) study will one usually find one's way back out of dogma to that childlike clarity of what it's all about -

but then in a more humorous and mature way. Religions can then be humorously and lovingly appreciated and criticized rather than seen as deliberate deception the way "Insider" puts it.

As the example of Bernadette Robert shows, this, however, can even be achieved by never being exposed to anything else than one religion (catholicism in her case), by simply practicing its profound aspect rather than attaching to its superficial dogma.

Had "Insider" pointed out this simple truth, he would have been more convincing to me, but he probably wouldn't have caught anyone's attention since it is almost a truism.

___________

So folks: relax and forget about any riddles regarding the truth or supposed historical frauds or supposed secrets of bloodlines or supposed wrongness of religion. It is out in the open, with or without religion.

Read Bernadette Roberts or Meister Eckhart or Eckhart Tolle or Ramana Maharshi or Ajahn Chah and the Sermon on the Mount and the Gospel of Thomas or Douglas Harding ... it almost doesn't matter.

But (and here I concur with Insider) practice it yourself.

And regard Insiders and Outsiders humorously and with kindness.

So folks: relax and forget about any riddles regarding the truth or supposed historical frauds or supposed secrets of bloodlines or supposed wrongness of religion. It is out in the open, with or without religion.

Read Bernadette Roberts or Meister Eckhart or Eckhart Tolle or Ramana Maharshi or Ajahn Chah and the Sermon on the Mount and the Gospel of Thomas or Douglas Harding ... it almost doesn't matter.


For instance, consider the biography depicted in this video

Thread: REINHARDT ...post your questions for him here. (Page 194)

If someone like "Insider" denigrates this man as a fake or considers his message as diluted or mixed with garbage in any way or as being informed and installed by bloodlines

then he can hardly be taken seriously.

If someone like "Insider" concedes that this man is an example of what "Insider" concedes possible: the Divine expressing itself in a human being far beyond the grasps of "bloodline" families, then why waste time with the cryptic allusions by people from the bloodlines ?

In either case, it should be clear how to decide wisely.

ping pong

I still don't get you Logos that what's your deal with this thread, I mean you still didn't make you point yet?

"Revelations of an Elite Family Insider":

This is real. It's not a hoax or intentional disinfo.

I'm an unknown, a punk, a nobody. But I am also an initiate. The understandings about higher issues (esoteric, spiritual, timeless, unchanging) expressed by this Elite Family Insider could not have been invented by some idiot. They come from someone initiated. Someone who knows what the School is.

Always be prudent with those who confuse "spirit" and "soul", as "the insider" does... for if their instructions were from The Pure Source they would never speak of the "spirit" as the "soul" nor would they randomly substitute one for the other during the discussion.

They are two very different aspects of the human experience expressed in two very different dimensions of energy.

And shame on people calling our Earth a hellhole. It is only what people have made of it. Leave it alone and it will return to a beautiful planet. God gave us this lovely home and certain humans have tried to destroy it. I believe God is going to kick these people out and give this planet to people who will take care of it. I know I would. Just a matter of time. Give some people a rope and they will hang themselves. They will only have themselves to blame.

"Revelations of an Elite Family Insider":

This is real. It's not a hoax or intentional disinfo.

I'm an unknown, a punk, a nobody. But I am also an initiate. The understandings about higher issues (esoteric, spiritual, timeless, unchanging) expressed by this Elite Family Insider could not have been invented by some idiot. They come from someone initiated. Someone who knows what the School is.



There is no school.

That's where you fuck up to be blunt.

The only thing that initiates you is the divine itself.

Always be prudent with those who confuse "spirit" and "soul", as "the insider" does... for if their instructions were from The Pure Source they would never speak of the "spirit" as the "soul" nor would they randomly substitute one for the other during the discussion.

They are two very different aspects of the human experience expressed in two very different dimensions of energy.



Yes, finally, glad someone noticed that.

Makes a change, since just about EVERYONE else does it, it's at that point I ignore them..

As one of them you clearly don't know. I like to call it the game, it sucks. There some realness to this. I have said plenty on this site about this.

Niiiiiiccccccccccceeeeeeeeee, I bet you wear a cross around you neck.

I am not to be believed, as it is suppose to be. It doesn't matter anymore the teams have been chosen. The rules are the same. You better figure out what your good fore. The school I went to was real.

And shame on people calling our Earth a hellhole. It is only what people have made of it. Leave it alone and it will return to a beautiful planet. God gave us this lovely home and certain humans have tried to destroy it. I believe God is going to kick these people out and give this planet to people who will take care of it. I know I would. Just a matter of time. Give some people a rope and they will hang themselves. They will only have themselves to blame.

Aye, Chuck.

Special school, plenty of them about.

Seems you haven't graduated, yet.



What you should try figure out, is the ability to communicate with people. Then try and remove yourself from screenplay you've become attached to, it perhaps needs editing, especially the ending, since it seems to lead you around in circles, of the nonsensical type.




Something about this Insider seems to attact deluded morons.

You know what they say?

Like attracts like.

You just worry about what you were taught to worry about.

"Revelations of an Elite Family Insider":

This is real. It's not a hoax or intentional disinfo.

I'm an unknown, a punk, a nobody. But I am also an initiate. The understandings about higher issues (esoteric, spiritual, timeless, unchanging) expressed by this Elite Family Insider could not have been invented by some idiot. They come from someone initiated. Someone who knows what the School is.

God is going to kick them out during the pole reversal and stasis.

Does nobody here Know

Shut up you babbling idiot
you fuck up
you've wrote

You [sic] better figure out what your good fore.

I am off for a month, here:

[link to plaa-thansadetresort.com]