I am a member of an Elite Family who you despise...ask me a question

you had a good run you little drama queen you! they even got your silly post back on the front page. i know you to be a fraud. but what the heck, the sheeple love it. it's entertainment...i know, you and your elite family are going to make me do another stint on planet hell again, i read the script.

my 326874 IP got banned,

but, I have no connection with the person called "insider" in these posts. I am completely unbias just intrested in the thread.

here is the pdf for download:

[link to www.scribd.com]

[link to www.4shared.com]


proof of hack,

first post insider:
Insider
9/24/2005 7:39 PM

second post on the first page posted:
Anonymous Coward 12/8/2005 10:20 AM

thats more than 2 months worth of posts deleted..... more than 2 flippin months.


all the q and a are gone, but only some responses left long after the insider left with a lot of repeating of the same answers. if that aint obvious, than i dont know what could be.

i do remember the thread, i was one of many who mocked this guy/girl, and yes there were problems getting into the thread when he was present and yes, the site got hacked after he left and this thread was affected only.

so whoever saved the thread, thumbs up, after reading it i changed my mind. he typed very fast which was very impressive. btw his was the first ask me a question thread, all the others copied him.

the links for pdf again:

[link to www.4shared.com]


[link to www.scribd.com]

I recently found that I'm only 400 years away (what, 5 generation? 6?) from the Plantagenet family on my father's side.

Genealogy researcher-friend thought that was a signficant discovery. I confess ignorance. What were they? Were they good, bad, fictional, criminal?

It's not those ... Windsor people, is it?



= (

Guess I could look it up myself.. but it makes me 'ead 'urt.

I read somewhere that Plantagenet was a generic name given to people who had no surname (at the time).

I don't now wtf that means either, but it doesn't sound particularly distinguished.

Every great play needs "Stage hands"...

The insider spoke truths mixed with untruths. You had to discern which was which.

The original thread was better. Shame it dissapered.

ok, enlighten us, which was truth which was untruth, you seem to claim you know the all truth and everyone else who says something else is wrong. we are waiting.

You have to make up your own mind as to what parts you believe.

One mans lie is anothers truth.

No. The Insider spoke with Truth but was selective in what was revealed. This was confirmed by "him" on several occasions. There were no untruths in any of the responses.

that was weak. first you pretend that in general you know the truth because you can see which is true and which is not, then when asked about it, you back the fuk down and basically say your truth is just personal interpretation.

if that is the case, your first post was dumb.

Someone asked "Insider" the following question
"How close to the truth are the writings of Neale Donald Walsch in his Conversations with God series?"

Insider replied

"About the authors mentioned: like I posted before it is not in your interest to accept human intervention/advisors/salesmen between you and the Divine."

I'm assuming "Insider" is human or a reasonable facsimile of the same. So why would anyone assume that his words are totally the truth. In doing so one gives up their free will and personal responsibility.

We have the ability to discerne so perhaps we should use this ability when confronted with "new truths". I have read what was left of the thread and found it interesting and informative, but I am not about to discard my truths and take up those of an anonymous person about whom I know nothing. So I am taking his/her suggestion to not accept his/her human intervention, advice or sales pitch, at least not until I was given more information about him/her and his/her qualifications to dispense such advice.

For the time being, I'm trusting in myself and my own truths.

"Namaste"

so who here said they believe everything insider said? dont patronize people and pretend you are higher. we were talking about certain points which people said he mentioned while no where it is mentioned. people adding their own thins and deducting others to say they are right.

besides most of the info he gave was about how YOU can connect with the source, so you wont need a person in between. he never said accept his opinions, in fact he said dont, its your choice. he gave tools to connect with it yourself. he told to disregard all info that wasnt from the source directly, by your personal experience.

that is the part you didnt notice for some strange reason, and like others you added/deducted things so you could present yourself right, and insider wrong.

Why are you so defensive? It is a waste of energy you could put to better use.

If you recall there is only a part of the thread which survives, so what I read was obviously not everything he/she said. Don't be so quick to judge or find fault with others. No one is right and no one is wrong. Kindly allow us to express our opinions as we allow you to express yours.

Thank you for your understanding.

not defense, offense. btw im on another pc now, but im the guy you responded to.

ironic you say that i shouldnt judge people so fast, yet you did with the insider after reading a small part of the text. kettle, pot, black.....

when someone like you, who hasnt read the entire thing and already says its disinfo, yeah, i spank them. read the entire thing, it has been posted in the thread, the pdf versions of the entire thing included a few pages back, and then come here with your patronizing tone, k?

you are wrong here, with your conclusions based on parts of the text. he clearly said to ignore all human intervention and go to the core by preparing yourself and he gave tools for that. so why do you claim he is intervening while clearly he only gives you tools to get rid of everyone getting in between you and the truth and prepare yourself for direct knowledge? he also didnt answer many questions and avoided the4m because then he would be intervening.

you are disinfo, like it or not.

Well said, guys like him will never understand they are doing the thing they accuse Insider of. I have seen this on many forums over the last 2 years. They take a small part of something, twist it and say, OK my belief says something else so this guy is wrong, he spells wrong so he is an idiot, yadda yadda.

Hang on Einstein. You say don't judge others so quickly or find fault with them, however you did exactly that with the Insider. You read excerpts you said and judged him and found faults.

Talk about hypocrisy and irony.

yep

Re: insider quote
Posted by: sideshow (IP Logged)
Date: August 25, 2007 01:46AM
just do a search for revelations from an insider on google and the PDF of the forum is downloadable for free. Of course now that I found this book it makes me wonder if that PDF isn't just a brilliant marketing scheme for this $50 book.


[link to www.discoverthedivinetruth.com]

__________________________________________


A brilliant come on for a book, a good book, but a come on just the same !!!

Why not this too?

good idea.

WHAT TRANSFORMATIONAL/CATACLYSMIC EVENT IS SLATED TO HAPPEN DECEMBER 23,2007 THAT ILLUMINATI FAMILIES HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR CENTURIES TO HAPPEN...