Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,018 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 779,099
Pageviews Today: 1,041,805Threads Today: 278Posts Today: 4,291
08:57 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject Why Not Redistribute Wealth?
Poster Handle TheTymeBeing
Post Content
...


OK, let's bump this discussion up another notch. Let's assume that at some point in the future this present age will pass away and the Evil that has ruled this world will be chained in The Bottomless Pit. The Millennium will be ushered in, as foretold in prophesy. Let's speculate on what the Millennial economy will look like.

How will/should it be?
 Quoting: TheTymeBeing


You have not described what man will be in this future world. If men are angels and if an economic system is needed to transact business, then ANY economic system will work fine.

But in the present world men are not angels, so the best economic system is one that best promotes fairness and productivity.

To you question earlirt about government rewarding banks for their misconduct, as toy have seen, banks have not changed their ways. So the answer is yes, we do get more of the behavior we subsidize and less of what we punish (tax).

You introduced a hypothetical. Here is another

A man researches for years and discovers a drug that CURES diabetes. He sells his new miracle drug and his income is beyond the limit and taxes take all over his limit. This man has the potential to develop a drug that CURES cancer. Why should he? Why should he labor for another long period of time, ruin his own health, deprive his family of his company for no gain?

Who would be enjoying Ipads if Steve Jobs had no monetary incentive to invent it? He already had billions. But 10s of thousands of folks would be deprived the pleasure of the new machine.

I bet you answer is they should work for the good of humanity. Well, maybe they would, but what if they wouldn't?
 Quoting: Real list


So, a $500K annual income isn't enough to create any incentive? This hypothetical 90% tax rate (which it what it was 60 years ago), would affect only about 1% of the population.

Do you think people who invent stuff are always motivated by money? Maybe they're motivated by the problem-solving process, or by a desire to give something significant to humanity, or to be remembered by the future. These people who presume humans only do anything out of financial motivation are living in a strange personal paradigm.
 Quoting: TheTymeBeing


You reject my hypothetical? How rude.

Your premise was to redistribute wealth. In this world, at this time and with human nature as it presently is. Now you want to change human nature and talk about a future world.

I pointed out one reason I believe your idea would not work and you argue the reasons I did not address.

There are many reasons why it would not work, but we only need to show one.
 Quoting: Real list


Hey, I'm just brainstorming, not trying to be rude. My apologies. Just pointing out that human beings are sometimes motivated by things other than financial gain.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP