HOLY SHIT ***LEAKED FOOTAGE OF MISSLE HITTING THE PENTAGON ON 911

Good point...

The only thing that concerns me about this footage is that youtube is showing it only has 301 views. Videos that those who run youtube does not like and want to ban, always show around 301 to 302 views.

Lets see in a couple of days where the views are at. My guess would be around 301 to 302 views, until youtube get called out on it.

Honestly, I want to say this is all made up, a fake video.

Though with youtube censoring the views the video has got, it makes one wonder.

Last Edited by The Deplorable Ryan Cawdor on 09/22/2011 03:50 AM

OMFG LETS SIT AROUND EVERYDAY ON GLP AND WORRY ABOUT IT OVER 9000 TIMES A DAY OMFG LETS SIT AROUND EVERYDAY ON GLP AND WORRY ABOUT IT OVER 9000 TIMES A DAY OMFG LETS SIT AROUND EVERYDAY ON GLP AND WORRY ABOUT IT OVER 9000 TIMES A DAY OMFG LETS SIT AROUND EVERYDAY ON GLP AND WORRY ABOUT IT OVER 9000 TIMES A DAY OMFG LETS SIT AROUND EVERYDAY ON GLP AND WORRY ABOUT IT OVER 9000 TIMES A DAY OMFG LETS SIT AROUND EVERYDAY ON GLP AND WORRY ABOUT IT OVER 9000 TIMES A DAY OMFG LETS SIT AROUND EVERYDAY ON GLP AND WORRY ABOUT IT OVER 9000 TIMES A DAY OMFG LETS SIT AROUND EVERYDAY ON GLP AND WORRY ABOUT IT OVER 9000 TIMES A DAY OMFG LETS SIT AROUND EVERYDAY ON GLP AND WORRY ABOUT IT OVER 9000 TIMES A DAY

quoting myself from the other thread about this video

FUCK YOU, YOU FUCKING FUCK.

Last Edited by The Deplorable Ryan Cawdor on 09/22/2011 03:53 AM

I agree although i actually think OP's footage is fake.

It is my understanding that a large aircraft travelling at high speed close to the ground creates a kind of cushion of air trapped between the ground and the wings that pushes it back off the ground.

I'm pretty sure this is often utilized as a fuel saving trick whilst in certain fighter aircraft flying above the sea.

But then again i know nothing about aircraft, maybe somebody can comment.

What, 9000!

The original helicopter footage was better.
I saw this video at least 6 years ago, and it was much clearer.

This version includes alternate angles that have been messed with.

The original was a short clip of the missle hitting and a white flame shooting out of the hole. Taken from about 800 feet up and less than a half mile to the north.

The quality of that clip has been degraded to match the faked sections.

This was clearly done to discredit the original.

I don't have a link, it is long gone, but I know what I saw.


Believe what you want, you have been doing it for ten years already, why change now?

I was thinking along the same lines. Its been at 301 for quite some time now and this is typical YT censorship.

I have 3 very close friends that are captains for the Airlines. They have all told me its impossible for a plane to make the angle of decent. In fact John Lear filed a lawsuit against the government over that very fact plus others regarding the towers.

The people of that plane, some people say, were agents, and they had got an another identity and live now on other places further on.
That plane, maybe it is that one, which was noted some years ago on a plane auction?!

The pictures of the hole are not fake. I make no claim that this video is real or fake. However the photos of the original hole in the pentagon is real. Just take a look at that hole do you see any wing marks and engine holes? Those engines were titanium. They would have left a mark or a hole them self. There is nothing but a round hole.

"YouTube does this on purpose. It is actually necessary. At 300 views, YouTube inspects a video to see where all the views are coming from-to see if someone is cheating to gain more views. After a while, if everything is fine, the view count will resume. Many people want more views, so they keep watching their video over and over again until the number gets high. YouTube stops the views temporarily at 300 to make sure that a person is not doing that."

I agree with you, except for one thing.

This always happens with anything political, over and over again. I for one am getting tired of the censorship.

Funny animal videos 100,000+ views. Politics or subjects that YT does not agree with 301 to 302 views.

Why did google, the bastards buy youtube for over a billion dollars?

Because the suppression of the truth was worth the price.

Though the idiots did not realize that people are jumping ship, many people realize YT for what it is and are jumping ship.

Last Edited by The Deplorable Ryan Cawdor on 09/22/2011 04:33 AM

This is CGI, just like the WTC 7 building 'detonations' video.

OP, you fell for it, or you are a shill spreading this BS.

Don't be a idiot, thanks!

Last Edited by The Deplorable Ryan Cawdor on 09/22/2011 04:38 AM

it must be jewish

Nothing crashed into the pentagon. Just a low fly by and a conventional explosion. A witness crawled out of that original hole

I actually haven't formed a firm opinion about it one way or the other yet, but I wanted to thank you for caring about my country and tell you I care about your country as well.

I don't know how to tell if a video is fake, so I can't say anything about that. But I think we can be 100% certain that there are some people out there faking videos about some very critical issues, and it is really starting to make me very angry. This is why I have sort of a love/hate "relationship" with YouTube. I might have to limit myself to funny videos about skateboarding dogs and the like...lol!

Not trying to be a smart ass, but i posted the same thing here on GLP the day after 911.

I was convinced by the pattern of damage and eye witness reports. No commercial airplane hit that building. I watched as the witnesses started changing their stories on the media and was convinced at that point there was a media cover up under way, and that the later witnesses were government plants. the clincher is that with all of the footage of the impact that was available to them , at least dozens of clear images, none of them were ever shown the American people or the world. If they had video of a commercial airliner hitting the Pentagon, they would played it over and over and over and over, like they did the second impact on the WTC.

Exactly this. And they've well and truly won that battle.

Yeah, you just abuse the shit out of anyone who does call it fake. Dickhead.

Exactly. The witness was April Gallop. She saw no plane, no missile, no A-3; she smelled no jet fuel or kerosene or gasoline.

So now we have a hazy video refuted by eyewitness testimony?

Somebody must be worried that they are going to be found out eventually so they are trying to muddy the waters.

Like the thermite scam.

Stupid video, doesn't prove anything. Welcome to 2011. This is all recycled old shit from 2001.

If a missle hit the pentagon then this video is TEXTBOOK disinfo.

Presenting the truth in a badly faked video. Truly brilliant!

Hard to get this casual stuff past glp though

have you not been aboard one of those cruise missiles, 1st Class all the way, I`m not surprised the hijackers took that flight to the pentagon. Might as well travel in style, right?

Do you need a passport for a cruise missile flight?

I have a question for you all.


Look at 2:17 in the video.


On the ground floor to the left of the hole I've noticed that the outside wall has been sheared. The finishing work has been destroyed. The shape and length of the damage seems to be consistent with a wing. Follow the eight main floor windows to see what I'm describing. I am not convinced one way or the other but I find it difficult to believe that a "missile" which created such a small impact whole also contributed to this the damage.


Your thoughts?

Looks fake, but no way to be sure based on this, and if nothing else it at least keeps the discussion going.

and this fake shit is still pinned? GLP you should feel embarrassment, like obama should feel embarrassment at the "wave" photo.