Here's another fine example of the need for the negative polarity in 3rd density. Quoting: Valtor
82.21 Questioner: Then even though, from our point of view, there was great evolutionary experience it was deemed at some point by the evolving Logos that an experiment to create a greater experience was appropriate. Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct and may benefit from comment. The Logos is aware of the nature of the third-density requirement for what you have called graduation. All the previous, if you would use this term, experiments, although resulting in many experiences, lacked what was considered the crucial ingredient; that is, polarization. There was little enough tendency for experience to polarize entities that entities repeated habitually the third-density cycles many times over. It was desired that the potential for polarization be made more available.
82.22 Questioner: Then since the only possibility at this particular time, as I see it, was a polarization for service to others, I must assume from what you said that even though all were aware of this service-to-others necessity they were unable to achieve it. What was the configuration of mind of the mind/body/spirits at that time? Why did they have such a difficult time serving others to the extent necessary for graduation since this was the only polarity possible?
Ra: I am Ra. Consider, if you will, the tendency of those who are divinely happy, as you call this distortion, to have little urge to alter or better their condition. Such is the result of the mind/body/spirit which is not complex. There is the possibility of love of other-selves and service to other-selves, but there is the overwhelming awareness of the Creator in the self. The connection with the Creator is that of the umbilical cord. The security is total. Therefore, no love is terribly important; no pain terribly frightening; no effort, therefore, is made to serve for love or to benefit from fear.
82.23 Questioner: It seems that you might make an analogy in our present illusion of those who are born into extreme wealth and security. Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. Within the strict bounds of the simile, you are perceptive.
IMHO this is very telling. :)
i don't understand this part fully. does that mean it doesn't require any effort to be loving to others? that it will just come naturally? no forced effort?
and the same with love for one's self? it seems the law of one didn't clarify that love for self is not always selfish. or maybe i missed that part. but it's very important to love one's self because one Is the others, as all are One.
but then there's the variable definition of love. i would say Intention would matter a lot here. for example, you could say the Illuminati are very loving because they serve as the catalyst. but obviously what they're doing can be perceived as horrible.
also, regarding the person who posted the picture of the middle eastern child bombed in the arms of the man, one thing people assume is that those who are killed suffer. who are you to say there aren't grand illusions like 9/11 put in place where it seems like many people were killed but it was just an optical illusion so grand so intelligent beyond anyone here's imagination? i would not assume horrible things and act upon such horrible perceptions, but that's just me. who's to say some angel did not swoop that soul to safety before the BODY got bombed?
is watching one's diet come from pure love? it is a forced deliberate effort and isn't always fun to eat healthy food as junk food to some. is that not pure love? is that acting out of fear? but it's acting out of love to prevent symptoms/disease/etc. who is to judge?
can one meditate all day and ascend that way? if you look at dr. emoto's rice experiment, it clearly shows your thoughts and feelings ALTER PHYSICAL REALITY. i did this experiment myself and it only cost a buck. you take white rice, cook it, put it in two jars. label one with a positive word and the other with a negative word. acknowledge the jars each day by the words on the jar. and you'll see the "negative" jar will rot and the "positive" jar will stay white.
can our thoughts/feelings create beneficial minerals? minerals are just energy. 1st density light beings. if you examine orgone devices, they bring tap water to the pH of 7.0ish and no higher, almost as if it is an Intelligent Energy. can our thoughts create calcium, magnesium, zinc, etc? or do they merely dissolve heavy metals and toxins making the beneficial minerals seem more prominent?
these are my questions that drive me lately.