Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,704 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,031,393
Pageviews Today: 1,793,587Threads Today: 699Posts Today: 13,737
07:35 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

You don't have the Right to choose what you consume...

 
Not Opinion, Truth
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 1576784
United States
09/29/2011 04:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
You don't have the Right to choose what you consume...
That is what Judge Patrick J. Fiedler seems to think!
[link to www.naturalnews.com]
1189
Share



(NaturalNews) After being petitioned for clarification about his decision in a recent legal case involving individuals freedom to consume raw milk and own "shares" of dairy cows, Judge Patrick J. Fiedler vehemently declared that individuals "do not have a fundamental right to consume the foods of their choice," and essentially reiterated his state's position that raw milk is simply off limits.

The Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund (FTCLDF), on behalf of Zinniker Family Farm in Elkhorn, Wi., and several other farms, filed a lawsuit against the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP) back on Feb. 25, 2010, asking it to clarify its interpretation of the law in regards to raw milk ( [link to www.ftcldf.org]

Wisconsin is among the most restrictive US states as far as raw milk is concerned. Raw milk sales to consumers are prohibited -- but private cow share agreements in which individuals purchase "shares" of their own cows, are exempted. However, due to the onslaught of raids in recent years against raw dairies, private raw milk buying clubs, and even raw milk cow share programs, the plaintiffs simply wanted to clarify Wisconsin's stance concerning these alternate forms of accessing raw milk.

And they got their answer. According to a recent report by The Complete Patient, Judge Fiedler believes that no individual has a "fundamental right" to consume any food without government permission. Even though the Ninth Amendment to the US Constitution establishes that the government has no business interfering in the affairs of individuals outside of what has been specifically enumerated to it, which, of course, includes freedom of food choice, Judge Fiedler apparently believes otherwise.

To summarize Judge Fiedler's response, which was obviously written in an arrogant and condescending tone, individuals have no fundamental right to own or use dairy cows, to consume the milk from their own cows, to board their cows off their own property, or even to produce and consume the foods of their own choice, period.

You can read Judge Fiedler's entire disturbing response here:
[link to www.thecompletepatient.com]

Groups like FTCLDF will continue to challenge such illegal and unconstitutional restrictions against raw milk, particularly in individual states like Wisconsin where officials have illegally prohibited it. But individuals that value this priceless freedom must also also stand up and resist Big Brother's concerted assault against food freedom, no matter form it may take.

Sources for this story include:

[link to www.thecompletepatient.com]

Learn more: [link to www.naturalnews.com]

Last Edited by Not Opinion, Truth on 09/29/2011 04:59 PM
John 8:32
And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1678177
United States
09/29/2011 05:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: You don't have the Right to choose what you consume...
You have the complete right to choose to. If you choose, you can go to the mountains and make pine soup. It is your choice. Every choice has reprucutions, yet it is still your choice. You are too entangled into the culture presented to you to realize that you have already made the choice to let others choose for you.
jannerfish

User ID: 2242807
United Kingdom
09/29/2011 07:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: You don't have the Right to choose what you consume...
People are always invoking the US constitution as though it were not just a piece of paper, backed by nothing. This is also the reason paper money is increasingly criticised.

The constitution, like all other bits of paper with symbols, signatures and official stamps, is interpreted for the benefit of those who create it. And can back up their interpretations with more than ink.

All paper is backed by force. If you can't wield any, it's not your paper and is acting against your interests. Drop the paper, and grab something else.
Across the desert lies the promised land - WW





GLP