Over 400 Scientists Convinced by New Scientific Evidence That Darwinian Evolution is Deficient | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8054 New Zealand 10/09/2005 03:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22547 United States 10/09/2005 03:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 19271 United States 10/09/2005 03:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Darwin´s Theory is only partially correct ... natural selection is a very important factor in species diversity. But there are "missing links" which can not account for reasons why humans have characteristics similar to primates, marine mammals and reptiles. We have been tinkered with ... by those who created us. Of course "they" dont want us to know that and keep feeding us fairy tales of creationism, religion and of course simple evolution. People would freak if they found out that earth was just a giant chicken farm for aliens ...nobody would show up at work on Monday. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2380 United States 10/09/2005 03:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17453 United States 10/09/2005 03:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2380 United States 10/09/2005 03:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30006 Denmark 10/09/2005 03:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
XXX User ID: 95 United States 10/09/2005 03:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | name one Nobel laureate scientist who doesn´t believe in Evolution. Name one! No one ever has. They never reply to my question. I wonder why? Sure u can find some "scientist" from some bible college that disagrees with Evolution. Whopee do! |
Black Jim User ID: 2894 United States 10/09/2005 03:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2380 United States 10/09/2005 03:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2380 United States 10/09/2005 03:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29322 United States 10/09/2005 03:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Humans, chimps almost a match By Steve Sternberg, USA TODAY Humans and chimpanzees share an almost identical genetic inheritance, scientists report Thursday in a landmark comparison that they call an "elegant confirmation" of Charles Darwin´s theory of evolution. Clint the chimpanzee, whose genome sequence appears in ´Nature,´ helped show there´s little difference between man and ape. Yerkes National Primate Research Center, AFP/Getty Images Although scientists have long believed that humans and chimps are related, this comprehensive analysis of their separate genomes offers the best proof of their shared genetic past. The 3 billion genetic letters in the two genetic blueprints are 96% identical with just 40 million differences, the researchers report in the journal Nature. By delving more deeply into those differences, researchers hope to explain why humans are susceptible to certain diseases; why our evolutionary paths diverged from ancestral chimps 6 million years ago; and, on an even more basic level, what makes us human. "We can peek into evolution´s lab notebook and see what went on there," says Francis Collins, director of the National Human Genome Research Institute. The analysis offers clues to the cause of diseases such as Alzheimer´s and to why chimps and humans are susceptible to different diseases. "Evolutionary analysis is a handmaiden to human medicine," says Eric Lander of the Broad Institute of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard. For example, in a discovery that could offer insights into Alzheimer´s, researchers found mutations that turn off the human caspase-12 gene, which causes damaged cells to self-destruct. Those mutations weren´t found in chimps, which aren´t as susceptible to Alzheimer´s. Knocking out caspase-12 in mice makes their brain cells more likely to survive with Alzheimer´s-like damage. Researchers also identified mutations in humans that were important for survival, including a gene associated with speech and a gene that ramps up response to sugar, an advantage in lean times but a potential ticket to diabetes today. "Reading these two genomes side by side, it´s amazing to see the evolutionary changes that are occurring," says Robert Waterston of the University of Washington. "I couldn´t imagine Darwin looking for stronger confirmation of his theories." make sure you read it all mongoloid..... "I couldn´t imagine Darwin looking for stronger confirmation of his theories." people who still argue evolution are mongoloids |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2380 United States 10/09/2005 03:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29322 United States 10/09/2005 03:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1889 United States 10/09/2005 03:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2380 United States 10/09/2005 03:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | if evolution is true why do you suppose men came from chimps? maybe chimps came from men? how do you know? the Creator formed man from the clay with His own hands he spoke chimps into existance you can refute that but you can´t prove it didn´t happen |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17264 Germany 10/09/2005 03:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I fully believe in evolution, but not exactly as Darwin would describe, and it even contains a certain element of intelligent design. Take insects for example. Most insects have a life-span of 1 week. In a week, they are born, reproduce and die. This is very fast. Now look at how many insect species there are. BILLIONS. Way to many to count. The short lives mean they can evolve faster. A couple legs get longer, the body color changes to match surroundings etc. Much easier with such a short life span. Since Hawaii was colonized, crickets were onboard the ships. Now there are 7 distinct types of crickets living in Hawaii that are offshoots from the original. Now look at turtles (or most large long-lived reptiles_. Life span of hundreds of years in some cases. Now look how many different types of turtles there are. Soft shelled, hard shelled, long necked etc. Turtles and similar reptiles have been around for a LONG time. But they havn´t evolved very much. You don´t see a turtle that can climb a tree, because if something came up that needed them to climb a tree, more than likely would have returned to normal during the life span of this turtle. There´s a couple other things to consider in this, like how long after they´re born until they can breed. Take rats and mice, they can breed something like a week or two after being born. Just food for thought. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 598 United States 10/09/2005 04:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Also there is not much difference in the gene pattern between humans and dogs. Wiser to look elsewhere for human origins. It should also be obvious that we could not have originated or evolved on earth. Naked in the wilderness, we would be dead. Nature does not evolve weaker forms. Learn to think outside the box. To the thinking mind it becomes obvious that each race had separate origins. Too bad we were so foolish as to mix it up and lose our original characteristics. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2380 United States 10/09/2005 04:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
gus User ID: 30030 Brazil 10/09/2005 04:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There is yet so much things to be figured out. So why bother with one single theory? No theory is completely wrong or right. They only have their power on a determined level of perception. Example: Newton´s Laws. What all scientist agree now is that nature is measured by our methods of perception. And currently, System´s Theory is the only theory that adapts to this new view. Stop losing your time discussing about old theories. A theory is only a theory if it´s understandable to all. If someone doesn´t understand Darwin´s evolution or doesn´t believe on it, then you can say that this theory DOESN´T WORK. Go after your own theory of everything. It´s worth the search. |
Black Jim User ID: 2894 United States 10/09/2005 04:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3760 United States 10/09/2005 04:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Its about time some real scientists admitted that Emperor Darwin has no clothes. Even a high school student can poke holes in the "theory" of evolution large enough to drive a truck through - Plato would have never bought is because its flawed logic. Variation sure nuff exists. Evolution is simply a bastard child of . And, as fat as those that believe in God as I do - disproving evolution doesn´t prove that God created man, could have been aliens or transpermia. But its amusing to me tht people that call themselves scientists accept such hogwash as evolution. Following evolutions logic the 747 must have spontaneously evolved from the 727 as an adaptation. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30026 United States 10/09/2005 04:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2380 United States 10/09/2005 04:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1889 United States 10/09/2005 04:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Rear View (nli) User ID: 30035 United States 10/09/2005 04:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ...for their part in all this the false claim of new scientific data or facts or even artifacts is allowed to be used, supported by the very publication of the article in the first place...now... ...the truth, in fact the old scientific artifactual record itself remains hidden deep within the bowels of warehouses in maryland kept under lock and key, guarded by the military day and night, forever to kept from the nosey public especially the media and normal run of mill educated scientists... ...the keepers of the secrets know what i am about to reveal here... ...the fossel record proves beyond a doubt that man was genetically engineered...there is no missing link so to speak of...there were several bands of ancient cave men all with different genetic makeups...during our early history... ...by the way...the fossel record is distorted to keep the discussion going forever, diverting from the truth all records and data to the contrary...that man evolved... ...to be sure of a controversy till the end of time the church stepped in and fabricates their own history of man... ...one of believe and you will be saved...)please pay as you leave, and thank you)... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2380 United States 10/09/2005 04:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1889 United States 10/09/2005 04:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1889 United States 10/09/2005 04:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2380 United States 10/09/2005 04:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |