All you've done is proven that they claim sovereignty publicly. Do you really think they'd have link at the bottom of the bank's website reading "Powered by Fascism" or something?

My point is, wouldn't it be in the best interest of these 'bankers' to keep their identity secret?

My intent isn't to attack your viewpoints, but I just don't see any other motive for the unconstitutional occupation of sovereign nations in north Africa / Middle East by the United States. I find it preposterously suspicious that every time a resource rich country decides to step away from the US Dollar, we (for completely unrelated reasons, of course) find a reason to invade and overthrow.

Can you give me another reason why Cuba is an enemy of the United States?

Unfortunately the only counter points I can provide are from the perspective of a US citizen, these are the stories that got me asking questions about intent. My points also do not prove that the Rothschild family nor the Vatican are in control of anything, merely the US Federal Reserve.

I don't know who pulls the 'real' strings and I suppose neither does anyone else other than those involved, so personally I won't claim anything is 'absolute bs' or 'absolute fact' until I know for certain. For you to even claim something to be 'absolute bs' without personal involvement in said activity is absolutely what you're claiming to be against.

Remember, companies can own companies that own companies that own companies, etc... Just because there is not direct exchange of money for all to see, doesn't mean it doesn't happen.

I live in the 'land of the free' and my political representatives (lol) are bought and sold by corporate interests, blatantly and legally. The world isn't black and white, there are many shades of grey.