Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,364 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 469,959
Pageviews Today: 614,329Threads Today: 191Posts Today: 2,565
05:24 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

2005 YU55 / New Madrid Fault

 
saros136

User ID: 3534731
United States
10/29/2011 03:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2005 YU55 / New Madrid Fault
OP, where do you get your information?



"The trajectory of asteroid 2005 YU55 is well understood. At the point of closest approach, it will be no closer than 201,700 miles (324,600 kilometers) or 0.85 the distance from the moon to Earth. The gravitational influence of the asteroid will have no detectable effect on anything here on Earth, including our planet's tides or tectonic plates. Although 2005 YU55 is in an orbit that regularly brings it to the vicinity of Earth (and Venus and Mars), the 2011 encounter with Earth is the closest this space rock has come for at least the last 200 years."

[link to www.nasa.gov]


 Quoting: The 6th Sun


That does not mean it was closer at 200 years before present.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3692886
United States
10/30/2011 02:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2005 YU55 / New Madrid Fault
.
... anyone know what the orbital time of this thing is? ...
.
ChuulRa
User ID: 4293102
Germany
10/30/2011 03:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2005 YU55 / New Madrid Fault
NASA: The last time 2005 YU55 passed this close to earth was 200 years ago... Same year as the great New Madrid Earthquake, COINCIDENCE????????
 Quoting: smokahontas


Source ?
ChuulRa
User ID: 4293102
Germany
10/30/2011 03:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2005 YU55 / New Madrid Fault
Checked it.

2005 YU55 has nothing to do with the earthquake.

[link to en.wikipedia.org]
[link to ssd.jpl.nasa.gov]

At 16.12.1811 there was almost a alignment by 2005 yu55 earth and mars.
saros136

User ID: 4322070
United States
10/30/2011 05:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2005 YU55 / New Madrid Fault
.
... anyone know what the orbital time of this thing is? ...
.
 Quoting: Wisconsin


Do you mean the time required to orbit once? Currently 1.25 years, but it varies slightly.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4367936
United States
10/31/2011 01:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2005 YU55 / New Madrid Fault
.
... bummer ... forgot to get the link for this info ...
.
... 396.4 day orbit ... 29 km sec -1 speed ...
.
cat daddy
User ID: 4356817
United States
10/31/2011 02:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2005 YU55 / New Madrid Fault
bump

An interesting aside:

In the Duluth catalog Vol. MII No. 22, November 2011 Page 42 I quote:

" In November 1911, an Artic wind now known as The Great Blue Northern sent temperatures across the US plummeting as much as 65 degrees in a matter of hours....end quote"

Didn't we just experience an unusual storm this past weekend that caused snow to fall in quantities heretofore not seen at this time of year? Hmmmmm.........
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1531486
United States
10/31/2011 03:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2005 YU55 / New Madrid Fault
Interesting post OP.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1470031
United States
10/31/2011 03:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2005 YU55 / New Madrid Fault
boring
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 2817705
United States
10/31/2011 11:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2005 YU55 / New Madrid Fault
"the 2011 encounter with Earth is the closest this space rock has come for at least the last 200 years."

[link to www.nasa.gov]
 Quoting: The 6th Sun


That does not mean it was closer at 200 years before present.
 Quoting: saros136


It does not even mean it was as close 200 years ago.

It sounds like NASA is saying that they have not found an approach as close in 200 years of back projection - the phrase "at least the last 200 years" suggests they gave up looking at that point.

It might also be read to say they have not found a closer approach, i.e. there have been equally close approaches in the 200 year window - but such a coincidence would merit a more unambiguous statement than they offered.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4367936
United States
11/01/2011 11:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2005 YU55 / New Madrid Fault
.
... so the NEXT encounter should be known ... yes? ...
.
... any info on that? ...
.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 810902
United States
11/01/2011 06:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2005 YU55 / New Madrid Fault
After this one, looks like 2029.

[link to ssd.jpl.nasa.gov]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1611270
United States
11/01/2011 06:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2005 YU55 / New Madrid Fault
2029, eh? thats funny cause i've heard 2011/2012 apologists say we really shouldn't be concerned about elenin or any other astro events. the ones we should worry about will come in 2029 or after ( i think 2036 was said ).

anyways, same rock, eh?


hmmmm ....
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4367936
United States
11/01/2011 09:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2005 YU55 / New Madrid Fault
After this one, looks like 2029.

[link to ssd.jpl.nasa.gov]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 810902


.
... hmmmm ... that's an interesting year ... we wait another 18 years? ...
.
... and is THIS the rock they want to land on? ... to experiment with changing it's orbit? ...
.
mintsta

User ID: 1505705
New Zealand
11/01/2011 10:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2005 YU55 / New Madrid Fault
ok since when has asteroids been linked to quakes i thought you would of learnt your lesson after all the bullshit elenin alignments the only pluasible theoryy is the 188 day theory
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1356782
United States
11/01/2011 10:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2005 YU55 / New Madrid Fault
anyone notice that the obs used on JPL are way before its encounter with elenin?

first obs. used 2005-12-24
last obs. used 2010-04-21

[link to ssd.jpl.nasa.gov]





GLP