The truth about asteroid 2005 YU55 & other near-Earth objects LIVE STREAM!

Please, anybody managed to recorded the conference? I cannot even see the Q&A that is happening now, my Internet speed sucks man!!!

Somebody should get Trinity off his a** and coordinate a team to point the GLP observatory at the moon the evening of November 8-November 9. That way we can all watch it live right here at GLP and those who contributed can at least point go SOMETHING he has done with it to justify their contribution.

OP, I vote you give a shout-out to Trin and hook us up!

Don Yeomans, manager, NASA's Near-Earth Object Office at JPL claims there is no chance that YU55 will impact Earth/Moon, etc.

woohoo glad i didnt miss it got here just in time

I will wait the day mate, since they are a bunch of liars...

ooops, wrong thread sry

some of the things people say on the chat are so retarded

The live stream chat was funny.

Over and over again people wanted to know how come they can not track falling satellites but knew the exact trajectory of these objects?

The other repeated question was.. why this thing is so perfectly round. The object has a satellite or it's own little moon, the real photos were very cool and she only showed those for a min and went to her computer replicas which were lame compared to the real thing.

Did anyone notice the one photo where the orbiting satellite or moon was not located where it should be. not sure if it was an angle change or what?

the real photos were not like the replicas IMO.

Also if anyone taped the interview notice when she is asked about a moon impact she briefly closed her eyes and looked down.

Not the best body language!

I asked
"do nasa expect a new carrington event in 2011-2014 (solar maximum) and are chemtrails used to prevent such an event?"
answer was we don't talk about contrails

NASA news conference today was a complete waste of time.

Completely skirted around all of the questions that I asked.

Complete and total coverup IMO.

Here's my 'before' video. After JPL updates the orbital elements Nov 4th I will make a similar 'after' video.

lol...nice

They sure dodged a lot of need to knows or re worded the questions.

Thanks OP

Godbless all

your welcome

good night all


cya

I wonder if the conference was more for NASAs benefit than for the public.

NASA can learn how many people hit the site or estimate how great the interest and the quality of the questions Ect..

This is the recorded video [link to www.ustream.tv]

Nice lava lamp LOL

What did Don say at 41.09? Did he say collision much like this one?

I believe he said "subsequent collisions once life formed"

I Want To Believe Too...

5***** & a

Nice Post OP

IT looked like the asteroid would hit the moon not the earth..I haven't read all the thread yet

well honestly i heard that the asteroid will miss both the earth and the moon but in the simulation it looks like it will hit the moon so what is the truth and not the conspectus...I dream t of a Astrid hitting the earth many of years ago wonder if it is coming true now

Theres the conference, the whole truth about Yu55:

2 more days and we will have more info
on how we interpreted things right or wrong or partialy correct ...