I spent 17 years developing various chemicals for Chemtrails - ask me almost anything.

here is an interesting video about sources of "chemicals" in our atmosphere.

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

i have a feeling that chemtards don't fully understand how it all works.

And who is funding the “scientists”?

Are you suggesting that ALL scientists don't actually strive to learn the truth and only find results they are paid to find?

I don't believe such stupid nonsense.

Who’s funding the scientists? Answer the question.

Look, I see where you are going. Stop being a bitch and make the paranoid accusations and then back them up about ALL scientists.

There are many sources of funding.

According to the World Meteorological Organization, 52 or more countries have cloud seeding programs, performed by 34 private weather modification companies. These include the US, Canada, Some South-American countries, the Middle-east, China, Indonesia, Russia and some EU countries.

Again, who is funding them?

Oh fuck off.

[link to www.acsh.org (secure)]

What does that have to do with the trails that come from behind jet engines. Contrails have nothing to do with cloud seeding. In fact, cloud seeding does not CREATE clouds at all!

Nothing. Research jet fuel atmospheric effects. No secret chemtrail programs needed

Boy the shills are ducking the question of who is funding their scientists.

Cloudseeding is another form of attempted weather modification, which is the basic subject of this thread. Weather modification is a very interesting subject so I bumped this thread with the cloudseeding aspect. Not trying to derail.

It's a stupid question and you are stupid for not knowing that it's a stupid question.

There are MANY sources. Some with agendas, most without. Some people care about REAL science. YOU aren't expected to understand that.

Name the sources.

I posted the ONLY link I am going to post on this subject. You seem to think there is a conspiracy for scientists to lie, then provide evidence to prove it occurs in atmospheric chemistry and all the people who worked hard in school did so so they could fudge the science for "them".

I understand that in the past, such as with tobacco companies, science has been altered. I get your point. But, the broad accusation without SPECIFIC evidence is paranoid and absurd. It also makes me wonder how you function in any society.

prove the chemistry wrong. Use science to combat science if you feel the need. But, to use such a pathetic blanket accusation is (two pathetics...ouch!) DISGUSTING and just serves to prove YOUR shortcomings.

I posted the ONLY link I am going to post on this subject. You seem to think there is a conspiracy for scientists to lie, then provide evidence to prove it occurs in atmospheric chemistry and all the people who worked hard in school did so so they could fudge the science for "them".

I understand that in the past, such as with tobacco companies, science has been altered. I get your point. But, the broad accusation without SPECIFIC evidence is paranoid and absurd. It also makes me wonder how you function in any society.

prove the chemistry wrong. Use science to combat science if you feel the need. But, to use such a pathetic blanket accusation is PATHETIC and just serves to prove YOUR shortcomings.

Name the funding sources.

Ok, for which study or school program?

Everyone you cited to.

Everyone you cited to.

You are citing to “scientists” to bolster your claims, it is 100% relevant who is funding them. Bias goes to credibility and weight of evidence. Now quit ducking and name the funding sources.