Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,285 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,215,064
Pageviews Today: 1,706,900Threads Today: 468Posts Today: 8,638
01:50 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

George Galloway Challenges US Senate Subcommittee To Debate Anyplace, Anytime Over Fresh Oil-For-Food Charges

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 371
United States
10/27/2005 07:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
George Galloway Challenges US Senate Subcommittee To Debate Anyplace, Anytime Over Fresh Oil-For-Food Charges
[link to www.wsws.org]
US Senate resumes attack on antiwar MP George Galloway
By Julie Hyland
27 October 2005

Use this version to print | Send this link by email | Email the author

British antiwar MP George Galloway has denounced a US Senate subcommittee’s claim that he lied under oath when he rejected assertions that he had received money from the Iraqi oil-for-food programme. He has accused Republican Senator Norm Coleman, chairman of the subcommittee, of mounting a political vendetta.

The subcommittee’s latest report charges Galloway with personally soliciting and receiving eight oil allocations totalling 23 million barrels from the Hussein government between 1999 and 2003. It alleges that at least £252,000 was channelled to Galloway’s Mariam Appeal, opposing sanctions against Iraq, through its chairman, Jordanian businessman Fawaz Zureikat. Galloway is said to have “knowingly made false or misleading statements under oath” when he appeared before the subcommittee.

The report also says that Galloway’s estranged wife Dr. Armineh Abu-Zayyad received £85,000 in connection with one allocation of oil, again through Zureikat.

Galloway has stressed that the supposed fresh evidence presented by Coleman on October 24 consists almost exclusively of allegations apparently made by Iraq’s former deputy prime minister Tariq Aziz, Vice President Taha Yasin Ramadan and oil minister Amer Rashid, who have been in jail since the US invasion of Iraq.

The MP has challenged the Senate subcommittee to sue him for perjury and for Coleman to debate him in a venue of his choosing in his home state of Minnesota.

The allegations are largely a restating of the charges previously made against Galloway by the subcommittee, which also focused on his connections with Zureikat. Galloway has freely admitted that Zureikat provided funds to the Mariam Appeal and that he did not know where they had originated.

In May, the subcommittee issued a report naming Galloway as a beneficiary of oil allocations under the UN programme, just days after his election as MP for the Respect-Unity Coalition on an antiwar ticket. Galloway, who had successfully challenged similar allegations by the Daily Telegraph and the Christian Science Monitor in court, insisted on refuting the subcommittees charges in person.

His May 17 appearance before the committee, in which he denounced the US and British government’s illegal war against Iraq and described the charges against him as the “mother of all smokescreens,” was shown around the world. Responding to claims that he had met repeatedly with Saddam Hussein, he told the subcommittee, “As a matter of fact, I have met Saddam Hussein exactly the same number of times as [US Secretary of Defence] Donald Rumsfeld met him. The difference is Donald Rumsfeld met him to sell him guns and to give him maps the better to target those guns.”

Coleman has admitted that the subcommittee’s decision to pursue Galloway was motivated by an effort to refute his earlier testimony and that the “additional evidence ... demonstrates that the testimony Mr. Galloway provided to the subcommittee was false and misleading.”

A Senate aide told the media that the charges would be referred to the US Justice Department for investigation of possible perjury, false statements and obstruction of a congressional proceeding—infractions that carry a sentence of up to five years imprisonment and a $250,000 fine. The report has also been passed on to British authorities.

In response, Galloway said, “The evidence is statements made by people on trial for genocide and now living in the dungeons of the American occupation in Iraq. Knowing what we do about what happens to people in those dungeons, you don’t have to be a genius to work out why, after May, they would get somebody to say what they want them to say.”

He reiterated, “There is not a shred of truth in any of these allegations. There has been no impropriety and I have not received even one thin dime from the oil-for-food programme.”

Galloway demanded Coleman “put up or shut up.” “I am demanding prosecution, I am begging for prosecution,” he said. “I am saying if I have lied under oath in front of the senate, that’s a criminal offence. Charge me and I will head for the airport right now and face them down in court as I faced them down in the Senate room.

“Because I publicly humiliated this lickspittle Senator Norman Coleman—one of Bush’s right-hand men—in the US Senate in May, this sneak revenge attack has been launched over the past 24 hours.”

The MP said he was unaware of the £84,000 allegedly deposited into his estranged wife’s bank account by Zureikat: “These are allegations about my soon to be ex-wife, who divorced me on the front pages of the Sunday Times five days before the last general election.”

Dr. Armineh Abu-Zayyad has rejected the allegation against her, stating, “I have never solicited or received from Iraq or anyone else any proceeds of any oil deals, either for myself or for my former husband.”

For his part, Zureikat told the Independent, “I have been to Washington, New York and Texas travelling on my own passport with the knowledge of American officials. No one wanted to question me. I have restarted my business with Iraq and I have an office there. Iraqi officials have encouraged me to continue doing business.

“I have had meetings with American officials. They wanted to talk to me about Iraq before the war, but oil did not come up and George Galloway did not come up. I asked them to check me out and they said they had done that and there were no problems.”

Galloway’s assistant Ron McKay also challenged the validity of the witness statements. “Tariq Aziz has been in custody and we know from his lawyer this Senate committee offered him a deal—just what I do not know, whether reduced charges or freedom.” He said that it was “ironic” that “Aziz, Yasin and Saddam are being accused, on the one hand, of being homicidal maniacs and on the other of being relied upon to give a true and accurate statements uncoerced.”

Today a United Nations investigation, headed by Paul Volcker, former chairman of the US Federal Reserve, will issue its own report into companies and individuals alleged to have received oil allocations.

Galloway has already stated that he was given an advance copy of the Volcker inquiry’s findings, and that it concluded that he had received no money.

See Also:
British MP Galloway blasts US Senate on Iraqi oil probe
[19 May 2005]







Posted on Wed, Oct. 26, 2005
Click here to find out more!
M O R E N E W S F R O M topix.net
• US News

British lawmaker lashes out against U.S. accusers

BY TOM HUNDLEY

Chicago Tribune

LONDON - Maverick British lawmaker George Galloway, named this week in a U.S. Senate report for allegedly accepting cash from Saddam Hussein´s regime, is demanding to confront his American accusers head-on.

Galloway, a brash critic of the Iraq war, has challenged his chief antagonist, Sen. Norm Coleman, R-Minn., chairman of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, to a debate, offering to rent a hall in Minneapolis for the purpose.

"We want to take the fight to the enemy," Galloway told The Guardian newspaper. He said he doubted Coleman would accept the challenge and hinted that he might rent a hall anyway and dare the American to show up.

"He (Galloway) would be better off debating the bank records," said Andrea Wuebker, a spokeswoman for Coleman. "Instead of focusing on the evidence, he´s changing the topic." In a report issued Monday, the Senate subcommittee investigating Iraq´s corrupt oil-for-food program claimed:

_Galloway was granted eight oil allocations of 23 million barrels from the Saddam government from 1999 through 2003.

_Galloway´s now estranged wife, Dr. Amaineh Abu-Zayyad, received $150,000 in connection with one oil allocation.

_Galloway´s campaign against the Iraq sanctions, the Miriam Appeal, received at least $446,000 from the oil allocations.

The report also accuses Galloway of knowingly making false or misleading statements under oath during committee hearings in May.

At those hearings, the outspoken MP caused a splash - and became an instant hero among some anti-war activists - when he ridiculed the Senate investigation and rebuked Coleman.

"Senator, in everything I said about Iraq, I turned out to be right and you turned out to be wrong," Galloway said.

On Tuesday, Galloway denied the allegations in the report and dared the Senate to seek an indictment against him.

"In this case the remedy is clear - they must charge me with perjury and I am ready to fly to the U.S. today, if necessary, to face such a charge because it is simply false," he told the BBC. Galloway said he never received "a dime" from the Saddam regime, and denied that he ever funneled money from the Iraq government into his Miriam Appeal. He also said he had no knowledge of his former wife´s finances.

Coleman, in a press release, said he was reviewing the evidence "to determine the propriety of referring the matter to the Department of Justice."

Galloway could be charged with perjury or obstructing justice, but no sitting member of Parliament has even been extradited to the U.S., and that outcome is considered unlikely.

The flamboyant politician, who has been dubbed "Gorgeous George" by Britain´s tabloids, was drummed out of the Labor Party last year for his relentless attacks on Prime Minister Tony Blair´s support for the Iraq war. He promptly formed his own party, Respect, and won a seat in London´s Bethnal Green and Bow district by courting angry Muslims.

After the first Persian Gulf War, Galloway was seen by many as an apologist for the Saddam regime. His closeness to senior regime figures gave rise to suspicions that he had taken money.

A separate inquiry headed by Paul Volcker into the oil-for-food program is due to release its final report Thursday. Galloway said he was shown a draft of the report, and that while it repeated many of the same allegations contained in the Senate document, it concluded that he had not taken money.

[link to www.tallahassee.com]
Anders

User ID: 37697
United Kingdom
10/30/2005 05:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: George Galloway Challenges US Senate Subcommittee To Debate Anyplace, Anytime Over Fresh Oil-For-Food Charges
RBH toys pram bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 37818
United Kingdom
10/30/2005 06:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: George Galloway Challenges US Senate Subcommittee To Debate Anyplace, Anytime Over Fresh Oil-For-Food Charges
The BBC reported two days ago that Tariq Aziz had released a press statement denying that he had accused Galloway of accepting money or any other rewards from Saddam Hussain´s government. So Coleman´s so-called ´evidence´ in this respect has turned out - surprise, surprise - to be a blatant lie.





GLP