WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!

Not exactly as the mean lifetime of a neutron is just under 15 minutes

I have come across that as well...gross incompetence?

It appears to have been a rush to announce a breakthrough that was UNPRECEDENTED!! as the rest of the team other than the leader had always wanted to recheck and re run the test before the press release.

"Rumours have circulated since the Opera result was first announced that the team was not unified in its decision to announce their findings so quickly, and Dr Centro suggested that researchers outside the team were also suspicious.

"I didn't trust the result right from the beginning - the way it was produced, the way it was managed," he said.

"I think they were a little bit in a hurry to publish something that was astonishing, and at the end of the day it was a wrong measurement."

Four different experiments at Italy's Gran Sasso lab make use of the same beam of neutrinos from Cern."

Prof Antonio Ereditato resigned but the rest of the team is still in place.

Not to drag things off topic but it looks like I am indeed showing a sunburn now after earlier in the day I say in the sun with no shirt on for about 15 minutes with the UV index at rated at 7.

It's a minor burn but still that is pretty quick

I would imagine that researchers outside the team would be suspicious. Imagine the implications of FTL particles. The earth is not ready just yet...i suppose.

There is also the possibility that it was covered up I guess as there was and is some cloudiness regarding the ill named "cold fusion" phenomena

And precisely what experimental technique was used to come to this erroneous conclusion? If you think I have not seen and studied traditional academic physics you are simply mistaken. I did and I came to apoint where I was basolutely certain beyond any doubt that datat was being misinterpreted , sometimes intentionally, and other tiimes it was simply being fabricated. There is NO EVIDENCE that a neutron decays, all of the real evidence indicates it is just as stable as a proton.
In your scenarist, What happens to the neutron? What does it decay into? And just how was this determined? There is no such thing as a quark except on star trek the next generation.

Again, it is a case of misinterpretation of observations, which has been a universal and integral part of science since the very beginning when a cave man dropped a rock on his foot and it hurt like hell. One of them said it was because the rock was heavy (mass) and another argued it was the fact that it's dropping was similar to throwing it(velocity), when in reality it was a combination of three factors combining together to create kinetic energy.

A quark cannot be detected except by dubious means that cannot differentiate between a quark and a neutron, and believe me, I've done my homework on this. Supposedly a neutron is composed of two down quarks with charge −1⁄3 e and one up quark with charge +2⁄3 e, and this will be discovered to be intentional subterfuge once the stiens are out of control of academia. There has to this date been NO PROOF by quantifying the number of 'up quarks' and 'down quarks' produced by the 'decay' of a neutron.

In reality, the neutron is absorbed into an atoms nucleus in the experimental apparatus by the strong force..and the mans and the stiens figure out a way to quantum-ize it with purely theoretical and dubious measurements of energy .





The neutron monitor simply shows neutron flux levels at the surface, It does not and cannot detect the source absent an indicator such as a specific event like a proton flare or a supernova, and even then the conclusions are in doubt..
As for your insistence that I am incorrect about neutrons being present in the free state in the galactic plane over many thousands of years, perhaps you will consider your beloved and trusted NASA a valid source. remember, you are arguing with them and not me at this point


How could they be present in the galactic background if they decayed with a half life of 11 minutes?

Much of this is common sense, which seems to have been derailed in academic science.
Obviously you have some homework to do, and need to stop insisting on superimposing quantum physics on reality using erroneous and many times fabricated conclusions. Member, the top theory get the funding ,and who is money hungry? Reality is j e w s are very poor scientists and one day very soon this fact will be finally realized that when they took over they led us down a path to nowhere in physcis..

Neutrons to NOT decay and are very stable in the galactic and intergalactic environment, lasting many thousands of years. The evidence is in the detection of neutron stars hundreds of thousands of light years away. How the hell do you think they detect a fucking neutron star, fucktard?

And in what respect was I in error considering our so called discussion? The glow of atoms in the atmosphere called the aurora is caused by high energy electrons trapped by the magnetic field of the earth causing the emission of visible electromagnetic radiation when making contact with atoms in the atmosphere, almost always following a Coronal mass ejection and a geomagnetic impulse. Since the electrons are in the highest concentration near the poles under ordinary circumstances, the aurora is most common at high latitudes. But to put a few flies in your ointment, the aurora has been seen form the equatorial regions during the last solar maximum.
As for the electromagnetic aspect of the geomagnetic field and the effect solar events have on it, this is basic and I cannot see how you find error in my analysis , but if you do I strongly recommend you simply discard the distorting filter of quantum physics and observe thing logically and keeping in mind that the physical world is real.

All I am trying to say is that we need to use what we KNOW as the foundation for building.

If you hire a plumber to build a foundation of a skyscraper, would you so up the elevators?

When you involve mathematicians in purely theoretical physics and build pong it creating particles and phenomenon as you go along to explain inconsistencies, this is the same thing as hiring a plumber to build your foundation.

Science is empirical observations and physical experimentation that can be reproduced independently.

It is observation based and verifiable. The super collider and Apollo are two examples of non science, since the results cannot be and have never been reproduced independently by anyone else ,and there are billions of dollars flowing motivating everyone involved to lie, fabricate and obfuscate, creating totally false science and a web of lies.

I am always suspicious of anyone wanting research grant money, it's why i have never asked for it. Most of you have no idea of the money involved, and how much it has to do with thr fact that the unworthy and incompetent get it because they are good at one thing above all, deception.


I don't need any more information than I already have to spend the rest of my life putting the pieces I do have of the puzzle together.

Sure, it would be nice to have your abilities recognized, and your work published with your name to it instead of a stien that stole it, but to me (sincerely, despite my huge ego) the most important thing is not recognition, but the betterment of mankind.
I have been labeled a hater and it is true I hate my enemies, but the only difference between myself and someone who is claiming otherwise is that they are lying and I am not.
The J e w s have made themselves my enemies, by thieving and lying and by causing my family great hardship, by threatening me and my loved ones with death simply for relating the truth about them in it's pure form, and by calling themselves my superiors in my creator's scheme of things.

This is one thing I cannot forgive unless it is sincerely recanted, and how do you you take back threatening to poison a mans family or oppressing and holding back an entire species through a unified conspiracy hidden behind a false religion (or is it a race, i can never get that right)?

A J e w is neither a member of a specific religion or race, but an organized supranational criminal , part of a incredibly unified conspiracy that has managed to make themselves the global masters. The next step to such an empire is the dethroning, which is history is any indicator is going to be bloody and merciless once the common 'gentile' has it revealed to him what has been done.

No, I don't think these people should be controlling everything we are taught, our banking industry, our government, our media outlets nor where our young men die fighting imperialist resource grabbing wars for their greedy satisfaction.

Call me whatever you want, the great cleansing is upon us and there is nothing you or I or the J e w s or the Knights Templars can do to change it. The survivors will be those who lived the truth. I was told by the elders of my people that the spirit of the great warrior and genius Indian Tecumseh lives within me and my live would be one of unrecognized and unrewarded greatness that would not be recognized until after my death. I can only hope I can live out their predictions.


And BTW, cosmic rays are +C Velocity neutrons.

It doesn't take much thought to figure out why "they" recanted on the FTLP. After all it erases everything after Maxwell's original work and would defrock all of the Jewish Nobel Laureates as total frauds.

There is no barrier to velocity of matter. At one time not so long ago it was believed that the speed of sound was an unbreakable barrier for matter, but real scientists knew better, and the one day very soon light will be identified as what it is, an electron vibrating passively to an oscillating magnetic field. It's velocity of 186,000 MPS is simply a defining characteristic of a particular particle in a particular physical state. It is not a barrier.

This experiment mentioned is no proof of anything since millions, no billions of dollars are on the line. People will kill their own children for a million dollars, what would they do for a billion? Are you telling me they wouldn't fake and concoct data and conspire together to deceive?
Quantum physics has long since been disqualified. The disqualifications are hidden behind false nomenclature like cosmic 'rays' and doctored data.

With ten million American dollars I could develop a machine capable of accelerating a one pound object beyond the speed of light inside of a years time, and at this velocity it would not only exist in exactly the same state it was at 0 f/s ,it would obey the general kinetic energy formula to preciseness.

Yes, it would take a tremendous amount of electricity and the right material to use as a projectile (here's where I don't give you what you want)

There's one thing we know moves faster than the speed of light, and that is a magnetic impulse. This is why particle accelerators all use magnetic fields in an attempt to accelerate a charged particle.

I am giving away more than I should but then I will never get the credit anyway. If you've noticed all of the particle accelerators are what appears to be large circles, well, what does the accelerated particle have to do continuously? Change direction, correct? What does it take to change direction? Energy, correct? How many times a second does a particle have to circumnavigate a 26 mile circle moving at light speed? How much energy is this breaking effect consuming, and is this not perhaps why these particle accelerators are failing to accelerate large charge particles behind light speed? Now I'm going to give you the answer, what would come first naturally is the solution to acceleration of charged particles namely protons and electrons to beyond light speeds, and it's not even rocket science.

Imagine all of the quantum researchers suddenly losing all grants. Imagine if you can all of the 'great' j e w s exposed for what they are, money grubbing frauds who faked data to prop up the single greatest black hole of research money every conceived, an idea that is so ridiculous that it must be claimed at this level of understanding logic or consensus does not need to nor can it exist, it is each mans interpretation that is correct.

This is not science, it's not even half way decent science fiction, it's a flat earth theory of such artificial complexity that no one in the world actually understands it, nor are they supposed to. and I can prove it so don't bother challenging me.

Now on to proving it by scientific experimentation. The answer lies in the geometry of the accelerator. Has it never made you wonder why they are always circles?
Listen up J E W 's
Here is a workable design for a particle accelerator that would actually break the light speed barrier. A series of doughnut shaped electromagnets each connected to a battery by a short conductor are arranged in a perfectly straight line of perhaps ten miles or a bit more using a laser to ensure perfection of alignment.
Since gravity is a factor acting on any particle with mass pulling it downward toward the massive object(in this case the earth), the best possible arrangement would be straight down. since this would require boring a rather large hole ten miles down into the Earth where heat would be extreme and cause conductivity problems due to excessive heating of the conductors involved, the gravity problem would need to be solved in another manner. So let's get to that later, and for now describe how the accelerator would actually work .The electromagnets as previously stated would be designed to have a doughnut shaped configuration, with the most intense part of the magnetic field concentrated in the center of the 'doughnut', so that the charged particle is drawn towards the center of each successive electromagnet. Now comes the tricky part. The timing of the firing of the electromagnets could be controlled by a single computer IF it was designed and programed to compensate for how long it took the signal that fires each successive electromagnet to reach it. Since we know precisely how fast radio waves travel radio control would be the simplest solution. Counter-intuitively, the signal would need to be sent to the farthest electromagnet first and to the electromagnet closest to the computer last. I don't know how many of you can grasp what I am getting at but the idea is to set up a series of electromagnets that fire successively at a rate that exceeds the speed of light. And walla. Introduce an electron into the accelerator and set off the pre programmed firing of the electromagnets using the proper timing and you know what, that electron is going to exceed light speed. Make a perfect vacuum and radically increase the power of the electromagnets and larger and larger objects could be accelerated. the key is in getting the electromagnets to fire with the proper timing so that the series of electromagnets fire in such a way that the firing takes place at a rate that moves down the series of electromagnets faster than the speed of light.. There is still the gravity problem to solve, but let me think about it another hour or so.

DEBUNK THIS, the reason why all particle accelerators are made in circles is because they are designed to fail intentionally.

[link to adsabs.harvard.edu]

[link to www.am.ub.edu]

[link to van.physics.illinois.edu]

[link to www.physics.fsu.edu]

[link to www.nature.com]

[link to drum.lib.umd.edu]

[link to arxiv.org]

[link to iopscience.iop.org]

[link to ns.umich.edu]


The reason for the development of the neutron bomb was to have a bomb that left no long term hazards after detonation but they never worked it out to be that clean.

neutron stars are detected and viewed by their radio emissions

Your faster than light accelerator is commonly known as a coil gun and they suffer huge issues.

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

When you can demonstrate electrical control faster than light speed you will have no problem getting your 10 million no doubt.

HELLO, CALLING ALL SUNTARDS!

[link to www.straitstimes.com]

Fox News has already made fun of that YouTuber

[link to www.foxnews.com]

That coil gun looks bitchin!

Particles that are faster than the speed of light are intrinsically known to me….same as, intelligent life exists and has for a long time throughout the universe.
Proving that the speed of light is not the wall is way beyond my knowledge or technical expertise…
If the Cern results were indeed correct and they did in fact show that a particle traveled some 60 nanoseconds faster than light, well then why not 100 times faster or 10,000 times faster than light as the cosmic speed limit? This of course opens up Pandora’s Box. Many people believe that even if life existed elsewhere in the cosmos that it would take years to travel to the nearest star traveling at the speed of light….AND traveling at the speed of light would be impossible because the closer you get to the speed of light the more massive the traveling object becomes and would require all the energy of the Sun or something ridiculous like that…making it seem as though it is just plain impossible to travel at the speed of light and therefore manned travel anywhere outside of our solar system is silly idea. The idea that intelligent beings are or have visited earth is impossible. This is the box we have been put in.

If the Cern results had been allowed to stand and it became widely known that there is a different cosmic speed limit than the speed of light, how would this impact our civilization and are were collectively ready to handle all of the consequences of such knowledge? I believe somebody said “not yet”. Obviously there are other big impacts as well if the speed of light barrier is shattered. This is just that one little thing that hangs out there that stops most people from truly believing that we really do have visitors zipping around the earth like gnats. Impossible!!

We have been taught that WE are the top of the food chain. The most critical of thinkers, the most intelligent of all life, blessed with empathy and other emotions. What if this were not even close to being true? Would our egos survive the knowledge that we are way way down the ladder when it comes to advanced intelligent life in the universe? That realization could be a real Ouch moment… I believe this is most likely true… the question is, where do we go from there?
I reserve the right to reprogram my mind as my beliefs are constantly evolving as new information comes to light….
A bit off topic…however could play into the big picure….

PS…Why not just shoot a particle through a magnetized beam to a receiver on the moon to clock the speed?

I have already explained in enough detail and given you information that proves conclusively that neutrons do not decay but are absorbed into matter in the surrounding environment of the experimental apparatus [CREATING THE ILLUSION THEY HAVE DECAYED and no matter if you list a thousand links to tradition academic quantum physics I 'm going to tell you the same, thing, . YOUR FULL OF SHIT and so are they. But that grant money keeps flowing forever into that black hole, doesn't it? Where is the advancement? Why did the neutron bomb turn out to not work as expected? You don't even know, do you?
I DO.

Electrical signals or radio waves in the form of EMR traveling at +C are not possible, however that does not mean that a series of signals cannot be produced at a frequency greater that light speed along the electromagnets of the apparatus creating a series of magnetic impulses that travel to each successive coil at + light speed.. Succeeding would be dependent on making each coils power source ( a high capacity condenser) connected directly to each coil independently. It IS possible to send a series of signals to the coils that the frequency of would make the magnetic impulses travel down the series of coils faster than C. This is a no brainer. You have a computer in front of you that has processor that can create in the billions of signals per second. It is not necessary to make electrical impulses or radio waves move faster than light for this to work, you are a dullard.

Maybe if you used some math to prove what you're saying?..

Oh, yeah....A.A. don't DO math.....he's just a hating crybaby.....

The neutrons are continuously generated by "cosmic rays
striking the diffuse particles and atoms that make up interstellar medium or diffuse "atmosphere" the article you linked was not clear about that in that case their "primary" neutrons were already "secondary" cosmic rays but referenced as "primary" in context of the study.

Wikipedia IS NOT a valid reference, BTW. And yes, a particle accelerator that actually works to achieve +C velocity in matter will resemble a huge coil gun. It is the control of the magnetic impulses in each coil that is the tricky part, or is it?
Not really, a ten year old with a clear mind that knows about computers could figure it out. So why hasn't it been done?

MONEY BABY.BILLIONS UPON BILLIONS OF DOLLARS SUNK INTO THE BLACK HOLE OF QUANTUM PHYSICS WOULD SUDDENLY DRY UP AND THIS FRAUD EXPOSED.

THERE IS REALLY NO MATH INVOLVED, THERE IS NO DOUBT THAT SERIES OF RADIO FREQUENCY SIGNALS COULD BE SENT DOWN THE APPARATUS AT A FREQUENCY THAT WOULD CAUSE THE IMPULSES TO TRAVEL ALONG THE COILS AT +C.IT'S VERY SIMPLISTIC

Horse manure. You can't read and you're adding your own 'commentary', which is brainless

I see you have now eliminated hysteresis from physics as well.

Another Zionist conspiracy no doubt

I will cut you in on the line of Tshirts I am planning the first one being

"NEUTRON DECAY IS A ZIONIST CONSPIRACY!!"
Anonymous Asstrophysicist

Then build the working model we are all waiting

Who needs math anyway....just a Jewish waste of time

That's too bad.

There are several different images of this spacecraft from NASA on YouTube. Looks legit.

Do humans still watch Fox news?

fixed the incomplete post

You are the best role player I have had the pleasure to interact with man

humans of the sheeple variety still watch

Yes indeed you are if nothing else simple to the extreme

Prove nuetron decay