David

"That was pretty dumb, that arguement you just put out there.

You were just caught supporting terrorists. You said they respected Regan, as though it were a good thing.

What about Regan´s support from the KKK and the Neo-Nazi groups? Were those good?

The terrorists wanted to give back the hostages. They were trying to arrange to give them back, and Regan´s guys contacted them.

Regan´s guys WERE RESPONSIBLE for the HOSTAGES NOT BEING FREED EARLIER. MONTHS EARLIER.

How the FUCK can you defend that??????

Damn, Bundy.

I Just Kicked Your Arguement´s Ass.
David."

Stop putting words into my mouth. I was *not* supporting the terrorists, and I was *not* saying it as though it was a good thing. I was making an observation, based upon circumstatial evidence.

You point about his *supposed* KKK-Neo-Nazi ties is BS because it has absolutely *nothing* to do with this discussion.

You say that the terrorists wanted to free the hostages far sooner, but that Reagan stopped them. Hmm, that sounds like you´re saying that a *Republican candidate* for President had more influence upon the terrorists than your man Carter (a *Democratic President*) did. That sure *sounds* like a ´no-confidence vote´ on Cater to me.

I am not defending anything.

BTW, if the terrorists *did* want to free the hostages, why didn´t they do so in the beginning (*before* Reagan started negotiating)?

No, you kicked your *own* ass!