Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax

folks ignore the pro-NAZI shrills who get their thrills keeping you in the dark.

Worried about Ed Snowden and the NRS?
Ever hear of the NRO?
Watch the video.
Ask yourself the obvious questions?

To the reader, this video clearly explains that in the 1960s we had magnification technology that could take a HI-RES image right down to 3 inches from 100 miles up.

That fact is mentioned FOUR times in this video.
[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

3" YES 3 INCH resolution from 100 miles is mentioned @26:43, @37:31, @42:20-7, and @ 51:07

Watch the video
MOON LANDING HOAX?

To the reader, this video clearly explains that in the 1960s we had magnification technology that could take a HI-RES image right down to 3 inches from 100 miles up.
3" resolution in the 1960s and fuzzy images in 2014?

That fact is mentioned FOUR times in this video.
[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

3"
YES 3 INCH resolution from 100 miles is mentioned @26:43, @37:31, @42:20-7, and @ 51:07

The fact that the spy agency NRO has placed dozens of these UNMANNED SMALL SATELLITES in orbit around the earth suggests they have at least ONE orbiting the moon as we speak.

And the fact that they should be able to share HI-RES images from 100 miles up from the lunar surface up to a 3" resolution where are no clouds or atmosphere begs the question ... why is NASA feeding 'we the sheeple' lo-res images of Apollo landing sites in 2014?

Why do we get WOW, incredible amazing HI-RES images from MARS and really lousy images from the former glory, the six Apollos landing sites, especially Apollo 11, the first time we ever landed on the moon?

Now compare MARS with the MOON
MARS WOW [link to blogs.voanews.com]

MOON Apollo landing sites ~ these images are shit when you realize what could be done in the 1960s.
[link to www.nasa.gov]

Yes I realize the camera on MARS is a land based camera.
Imagine a robot creeping around the former Apollo landing sites taking 'we the sheeple' for a ride down memory lane, reliving the former glory etc.

The other image I posted purporting to be Apollo landing sites really suck when compared to the technology we had in the 1960s.
WHY WHY WHY do they feed us shit?

WHY?
For a demonstration of the technology available in the 1960s, which did not change much until google earth applied it....
Watch this:
[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

So clearly 'we the sheeple' are being duped in a big way.

Does an asshole like you really think you will change my mind?



Does not matter my heart is made up.

Inability to address any of my points noted.

As you, yourself said proudly:


Thus demonstrating your utter inability to think rationally about the issue, and your pride in that inability. I'm glad you admitted it, though. That is more brave and more honest than many a hoax-believer.

More deflection noted. Ad hominem noted as well.

dude your stupid arguments are also lame
the fact that I can use GOOGLE EARTH to see my own house but NASA can not give me the money shot regarding those former landing sites is the smoking gun mister dumbfuck.

EWE take care mister patri-idiot
EWE dumbfucks never went to the moon
NO human has gone beyond about 1000 miles

APOLLO is a FAIL

And the Chinese are planning to send robots on their next mission to the moon to retrieve rocks?

duh why?
wouldn't it be cheaper just to buy some from NASA.
apparently they have 800 lbs.
lol lol lol

No human has gone more than 1000 miles off the face of the earth.

Both JESUS and APOLLO are BS
The two biggest LIES in the last 2000 years...

why do ewe keep reBLEATing such fucking inane shit dude?

you really are a retard

do you have a black book with columns that you check off?

how many times have I called you a patri-idiot?

p.s.
I AM done talking with ye retard.
Unless you are responding to the video AstroSpies.

Raphy doesn't understand the difference between pontificating while stoned and actually proving something.

Inability to address my points, and further ad hominems noted. The fact that you were *lying* when you claimed that "It has been proved that rocks from the surface were obtained by robots and brought back to earth...." and your inability to retract said statement speaks far more about 'ewe' than anything wrong with the Apollo program. Further, your inability to logically refute my points, and your choice in choosing to ignore my points instead, closes the book on any possibility of a rational thought about Apollo from you.

A pity. But not a surprise.

As the awakening of consciousness continues apace on this planet, more and more people are figuring out that we never sent men to the moon. I meet more people every day who see through the government's lies, of all stripes. That the obviously false moon landing totem is finally ceasing to be worshiped bodes well for the future of humanity.

As the awakening of consciousness continues apace on this planet, more and more people are figuring out that we never sent men to the moon. I meet more people every day who see through the government's lies, of all stripes. That the obviously false moon landing totem is finally ceasing to be worshiped bodes well for the future of humanity.

I bet a seegullible dumbfuck like you beLIEves in Jesus walking on water too?



patriot + bible + lack of library card = patri-idiot



hey dumbfuck yankee doodle dandy, have you found any WMD yet in Iraq or anywhere else other than your own backyard?



nope the dopes #1 and #2 are just more proof that BRAINWASHING exists and works on a large scale.
JESUS walking on water is LIE #1
Man walking on the moon is LIE #2



I LOVE the fact that TRUTH has given DUMB + DUMBER something to do.



TRUTH always finds it amusing that such self proclaimed intelligent assholes like the two of ye have made it your destiny to spend your time debating with morons like me who pontificate while stoned?
If you really believe that dude, why bother with little ole me?


btw do you stop to kick the guy in the street begging for loose change?



Every time dumb and dumber show up to debate what is in plain sight, i.e. how the NRO satellites could map out the MOON's surface since in Hi-Res and NASA continues to provide 'we the sheeple' bullshit lo-res images of the Apollo landing sites only goes to prove that NASA has been lying to 'we the sheeple' since day 1.

hey folks ignore DUMB and DUMBER
there is no point in engaging dumbfucks
read this Thread: MOON HOAX ~And the smoking gun is the same technology GOOGLE EARTH uses!!!

I started a new thread that will focus ONLY on this issue.

hey folks ignore DUMB and DUMBER
there is no point in engaging dumbfucks
read this Thread: MOON HOAX ~And the smoking gun is the same technology GOOGLE EARTH uses!!!

I started a new thread that will focus ONLY on this issue.

How and why 'we the sheeple' are happy with having dozens of NRO satellites keeping an eye on us ... with up to 3" inch resolution from 100 miles up, and yet we should sleep well at night knowing the NASA NAZIs are looking after our best interests.

Be forewarned every post of mine from this point on will be a cut and paste directing the readers to the ONE idea that is the smoking gun.

'GOOGLE EARTH' ironically provides the proof that the MOON Landings were BULLSHIT.


you two fellas are on your way to hell because that is where stupid ignorant wankers end up.

cya

The only function of moon hoaxers is to make flat Earth believers look respectable.

I am small fry compared to Steven Greer and others who suggest we should not trust NASA too ...

the TRUTH is fuzzy, and it gets fuzzier due to dumbfuck forums like GLP

I am small fry compared to Steven Greer and others who suggest we should not trust NASA too ...

the TRUTH is fuzzy, and it gets fuzzier due to dumbfuck forums like GLP

Greer is a known conman and like ALL of the moon hoaxers, has absolutely no background or qualifications in space related science whatsoever.

Sorry, but I won't believe a guy who charges people $1500 to hang out with him in the woods to look at invisible spaceships that only he can see.

*Still* unable to address my points, nor admit you were *lying* when you claimed that "It has been proved that rocks from the surface were obtained by robots and brought back to earth...."?

Shocking.

GLP member 7444 = God's Lost Plebe

what doesn't God's Lost Plebe with rocks in his head not understand that I do not want to discuss his pet peeve called the pet rock theory?

the information you request can be found on the internet
this I found in about 7 seconds

Perhaps one of the most significant advances in sample return missions occurred in 1970 when the robotic Soviet mission known as Luna 16, successfully returned 101 grams (3.6 oz) of lunar soil. Likewise, Luna 20 returned 55 grams (1.9 oz) in 1974 and Luna 24 returned 170 grams (6.0 oz) in 1976. Although they recovered far less than the Apollo missions, they did this fully automatically.

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

And please read this mister red, white, and blue flag waving patri-idiot

Ad hominem noted.



You seemed perfectly willing to discuss it until I called you on the carpet for making claims without the evidence to support them. Your subsequent attempted evasions have been ridiculously entertaining. Ad hominem noted, by the by.



So, based on that, you are now supporting that some twenty-four *hundred* robotic missions made it to the Moon without anyone noticing, that they returned much heavier stuff, much bigger stuff, and also drilled out core samples, without providing so much as a blueprint for their existence, a single engineer who worked on such a surreptitious project, a single witness who saw any of the *thousands* of necessary launches, nor being unable to produce even a photo of such a device.

And you think the evidence for Apollo is sketchy?

You also fail to note that the samples returned by the Soviets in 1970 matched the samples returned from Apollo *a full two years earlier.* I suppose NASA has geologic psychics employed to fake such a thing.



Ad hominem noted.



Which is why we sent men to the Moon to do it. QED.

Please refer to your earlier claim, where you wrote: "It has been proved that rocks from the surface were obtained by robots and brought back to earth...." You have not *proved* any such thing. Either retract the statement, or continue demonstrating your irrational defense of said position, which reveals far more about you than it does me.

you are a dumbfuck with comprehension problems
clearly one of Gods Lost Plebes

I posted information showing the AMERICANS FAILED in building ROBOTS and your response is that is why we sent men to the moon to do what robots could not do?

... to collect rocks?

It would have been cheaper to ask the RUSSIANS to collect ROCKS instead of risking the lives of astroNOTS

LOL
mortal man NEVER EVER walked on the moon
more and more people are realizing NASA is no different than the NRO, NSA, CIA, etc.

Where were the 2000 or so robotic launches necessary to bring back the lunar samples we have?

why can't patri-idiots ever see the deception, until its too late...?

what patri-idiots like you call moonROCKS is really moonDUST weighing grams.
yes the samples given out to test and as gifts are moonDUST not rocks

ALL of those other samples that were NOT tested but used for lying are meteors collected at the south pole etc.

why can't patri-idiots ever see the deception, until its too late...?

what patri-idiots like you call moonROCKS is really moonDUST weighing grams.
yes the samples given out to test and as gifts are moonDUST not rocks

ALL of those other samples that were NOT tested but used for lying are meteors collected at the south pole etc.

you would NEVER make a good secret agent.
you are too stupid, too gullible
too much of a dupe

Ad hominem noted. Surely the most worthless shot in your quiver.



Ah.

[link to msnbcmedia.msn.com]

[link to static.panoramio.com]

[link to www.astro.washington.edu]

I could go on for hundreds of pages. In fact, you can request such samples *yourself,* and they ain't just dust.

[link to www.lpi.usra.edu]

[link to curator.jsc.nasa.gov]

[link to curator.jsc.nasa.gov]

[link to ares.jsc.nasa.gov]

Your researching skills appear lacking.



You, of course, have evidence for this. Also, along a similar line: when do you think the first Lunaite was *identified* as a Lunaite? And how was the identification *confirmed?* If you bother to research and answer those questions, you will see why your logic is in abeyance.




Ad hominems noted.

mister patri-idiot are you keeping tabs of the ad hominems?

why?
at the end of the day you will be proved to be a fucktard

A treasured piece at the Dutch national museum - a supposed moon rock from the first manned lunar landing - is nothing more than petrified wood, curators say.
It was given to former Prime Minister Willem Drees during a goodwill tour by the three Apollo-11 astronauts shortly after their moon mission in 1969.
When Mr Drees died, the rock went on display at the Amsterdam museum.
At one point it was insured for around $500,000 (£308,000), but tests have proved it was not the genuine article.
The Rijksmuseum, which is perhaps better known for paintings by artists such as Rembrandt, says it will keep the piece as a curiosity.
"It's a good story, with some questions that are still unanswered," Xandra van Gelder, who oversaw the investigation that proved the piece was a fake, was quoted as saying by the Associated Press news agency.
"We can laugh about it."
The "rock" had originally been been vetted through a phone call to Nasa, she added.
The US agency gave moon rocks to more than 100 countries following lunar missions in the 1970s.

[link to news.bbc.co.uk]