'I can't be sure God DOES NOT exist': World's most notorious atheist Richard Dawkins admits he is in fact agnostic

Atheism = Ultimate ignorance and Pride

At least Theists have legitimate reason to believe in a Higher Power with all the religious texts throughout the ages and man having a relationship with the Creator since the beginning of time.

Not to mention how life is held together in a delicate balance and brought forth in a way so mysterious even to baffle the world's top scientist.

A Seed makes a Tree. A Baby into a Human. Rain from the Heavens.

Tell me the world has no meaning.

In John 8:24 Jesus declared: “For if you should not believe that I am [ego eimi] you will perish in your sins”

[link to christiandefense.org]

only the stupid ones never change their opinion

Richrd Dawkins could answer a question about DNA when questioned by the Islam channel.

Darwin's Theory on evolution is just a ......theory. It is not a FACT of evolution. End of discussion.

Thank you.

You are a deluded twit.

Just proves he has an open mind, like all scientists, unlike religious fruitcakes.

Just proves he has an open mind, like all scientists, unlike religious fruitcakes.
11376258

Christians are not moved by anyone that claims there is no God, nor are they moved from where they have stood when someone changes their channel of reason. It is good however, that he is reconsidering his "absolute" position of no God as being his reasoned truth, as he comes to the end of himself.

Many of the ones who pushed Atheism were really worshiping the devil behind closed doors.

They deceived the masses so they could carry out their agendas with less resistance. If you forsake God, it's easier for evil people to deceive and control you.

Good for Dawkins... it's the only rational path.

Take it as you want, this is a bombshell in the scientific world.

Many will feel less inhibited to really start thinking now their great leader and champion has admitted he has done some new thinking.

He didn't have that open mind until now though... it took him his whole life to come to that conclusion.

Reminds me of Einstein... he too was an atheist, and didn't he change his mind about the existence of God on his deathbed?

Yes, Einstein was J---sh... doesn't imply you even believe in God.

Science has already stated an absolute rule: You cannot get something from nothing, therefore how did it all start? It's illogical to believe "it" (creation/matter) has always existed, because of the law I just stated.

The Creator, whatever or whomever that is, I can only speculate, thus faith...I must however believe there to be a supernatural force that brought forth creation as we observe and interact with it...

Furthermore, I must believe, by logic, that the creator is good...St. Thomas Aquinas has proven through exhaustive logic, that God must be good...

Quantum physics further dictates there must be a creator, due to the complex organization of all of creation, and the fact that particles are "merely" bits of radiation and light that can transverse between dimensions, appearing and disappearing, or "popping in and out of reality"...Therefore "reality is an illusion, albeit a persistent one" ~ Einstein

the religious god
does not exist.. the REAL one does and its simply not this shit most believe in. This one below is both a cartoon and the cartoon god in peoples minds.

:NOT GOD:

Dawkins has said this publicly for his entire career. He didn't suddenly change his mind. You people acting like this is some kind of 'win' are pathetic.

Most atheists will tell you they can't prove God doesn't exist. That doesn't mean they believe in one.

This isn't new. I can find you videos of Dawkins from 10 years ago saying that he can't prove God doesn't exist. The same goes for fairies, Zeus, Bigfoot etc. This was never a secret.

we have to give up this fake cartoon shit in the sky though.. people want still this fake cartoon shit and just this is the only planet God ever made and all that bullshit...

:NOT GOD:


God is the creating mind.. in its simplest form..and that a Fragment of that Father indwells humans. and people will not look at that concept.

Its a sky man in a beard is the belief... and LIE is in the world belief.

and then this silly heaven also in the clouds..

God is the creation would be another word in a sense.. but since God is MIND and thinking.. and everything that exists was and is made by MIND... the creation of the body or result of creating MIND.

You don’t understand what a theory is in science. Evolution is a fact.

Rain is from the heavens?????????????????? really. so you go up there to the heavens and be rained on for eternity.. ????????????????????????? I guess that is where Jesus comes from.. the rain and he is expected to return walking across rain clouds. and rapturing ONLY Christians up onto those clouds.. This is NOT HUMAN INTELLIGENCE people.

I agree... it HAS to be "supernatural" as anything natural is not capable of bringing a universe into existence from nothing.

Having an Icon is natural to us...We see the world in icons and think in icons, therefore making God into, well "Father Time" basically, is not harmful...

I grew up in Catholic Schools, grade and High School, and we never believed God lived in the sky...

We do not pretend to know where He is or where heaven is, only that both exist...

The sky god model is a mockery and an insult frankly, and the creation of a weak mind...

Last Edited by BRIEF on 07/13/2021 08:21 AM

Agnostics ... We Ride!!!!

https://imgur.com/a/gJPPSU7

Come on... it's a metaphor. You know that.

:bllblchck6:




- - - - - -

First, 'Science' has never stated that rule. We've never observed 'nothing' or whether or not something can come from it.

If you are willing to believe that a 'Creator' simply always existed for no reason or cause, then why not a simple primal universe? Isn't that less complicated than an omnipotent, intelligent entity?

WE are pathetic???

Then why do you think his audience was stunned?

This is where the defining of terms comes into play...Before we can effectively communicate, we must agree on the definition of all terms!

Last Edited by BRIEF on 07/13/2021 08:25 AM

Really? Then tell me why his audience was stunned?

Maybe, unlike you, his scientific peers never heard him say this before?