|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
'I can't be sure God DOES NOT exist': World's most notorious atheist Richard Dawkins admits he is in fact agnostic
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
|
Post Content
|
Science has already stated an absolute rule: You cannot get something from nothing, therefore how did it all start? It's illogical to believe "it" (creation/matter) has always existed, because of the law I just stated.
The Creator, whatever or whomever that is, I can only speculate, thus faith...I must however believe there to be a supernatural force that brought forth creation as we observe and interact with it...
Quoting: BRIEF First, 'Science' has never stated that rule. We've never observed 'nothing' or whether or not something can come from it. If you are willing to believe that a 'Creator' simply always existed for no reason or cause, then why not a simple primal universe? Isn't that less complicated than an omnipotent, intelligent entity?
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
