Sell Your Baby Foreskin on Stock Market

this whole thread is stupid because the plastibell type device causes the foreskin to fall off on it's own

AFTER YOU TAKE THE BABY HOME

so unless you grab up the dried dead skin and sell it

don't worry about it

Going to agree with you on this one. I'm not jewish but I am cut and I happen to have spectacular sex. If it were possible, I wouldn't go back to uncut given the choice.

happy with it because they never had a choice. and i meant it is awful for the man AND woman

scientific studies support this..

[link to www.cirp.org]

WTF is your problem? Why are you always trying to turn everything into people hating jewish people? I don't understand you all, one bit. And stop with the picture posts, it's clear to most here, what you are up to.

Truly I say we are DOOMED.

A "scientific Study" that recruits participants from a anti-circumcision newsletter and sex magazines can by no stretch of the imagination be called creditable.

Methods

Women having sexual experience with both circumcised and anatomically complete partners were recruited through classified advertisements in magazines and an announcement in an anti-circumcision newletter. Respondents to the advertisements were mailed a survey to complete and return, the comments then compiled and the responses analysed statistically. The survey is continuing and this article reports the preliminary results.

[link to www.reddit.com]

Let me see... here we have a Northern European "stone hut" surrounded by Alpine woods, a cute cartoon named "teen #9", and a disertation on genital mutilation.

Actually it's a particularly beautiful overnight shelter on Mt Fuji, I uploaded a few nice pics a couple of months ago. The ones on Mt Shasta where I grew up are of wood, with a nice big pot bellied stove inside.

Who's penis, whose rights?

[link to www.youtube.com]

In the Book of Galatians, Paul answers the question: "Is it necessary to be circumcised in order to be saved?" (Acts 15:1). Why did Paul feel compelled to answer this question? Simply because this question was of primary importance to believers of the early church, both Jewish and Gentile (Gal 2:1-5).

Paul's letter is addressed to the churches of Galatia (Gal. 1:2) where there were both Jewish and Gentile believers. Some of the Jewish believers incorrectly taught the Gentile believers that they must be circumcised:

Gal. 6:12-13: "As many as desire to make a good showing in the flesh, these try to compel you to be circumcised, only that they may not suffer persecution for the cross of Christ. For not even those who are circumcised keep the law, but they desire to have you circumcised that they may glory in your flesh."

Apparently, these Jewish believers did not keep the whole law, but still believed that circumcision was necessary. Such was the importance of circumcision in the mind of some Jewish believers.

A similar problem had occurred in Antioch, and we read of this in Acts 15. The Jerusalem conference was called to settle this question of circumcision. A letter was written to the Gentile believers, to be delivered by Paul and Barnabas, accompanied by Judas and Silas. It is interesting to note verse 24:

Acts 15:24: "... we have heard that some who went out from us have troubled you with words, unsettling your souls, saying, 'You must be circumcised and keep the law' -- to whom we gave no such commandment ..."

We see, then, that it was not the apostles at Jerusalem who had sent these men to tell the Gentiles at Antioch that they must be circumcised. Rather, these men from Judea had taken it upon themselves to do this. The same was the case in the churches of Galatia. Certain ones had taken it upon themselves to spread this wrong teaching regarding circumcision.

With this background information in mind, let us consider what are Paul's main points in defence of the true teaching regarding circumcision.

1. Neither Circumcision nor Uncircumcision

Paul emphasises the superiority of faith, love, and the new creation. By comparison, neither the rite of circumcision nor uncircumcision holds any benefit for the believer:

Gal. 5:6: "For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision avails anything, but faith working through love."

Gal. 6:15: "For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision avails anything, but a new creation."

Paul considers this so important, that he restates it in his letter to the Colossians:

Col 3:9-11: "Do not lie to one another, since you have put off the old man with his deeds, and have put on the new man who is renewed in knowledge according to the image of Him who created him, where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcised nor uncircumcised, barbarian, Scythian, slave nor free, but Christ is all and in all."

We here learn of a connection between the new creation of Gal. 6:15 and the new man of Col. 3:10 -- in both cases neither circumcision nor uncircumcision is of any importance whatsoever.
[link to www.sentex.net]

Kentucky Fried Foreskin, hmmm