Moon Hoax Proven

You're preaching to the choir. Everyone here knows there is no way humans have ever been rocketed out of low earth orbit and survived. Here we are more than half a century later and we can barely make to the space station and back.

honestly who gives a crap.

so we didnt land on the moon...

someone kill a bigfoot and then ill squeal with excitement.

Astronauts of old were chosen more for their acting abilities than anything else.

Are shills giving up in the face of overwhelmingly obvious proof? Is this the new strategy?

Yea im a government paid shill dude.

Im simply pointing out that if its true or false, it has no implications on the real world.

Now if someone kills a bigfoot... hit me up so I can rewrite primate evolution, and prove aliens exist.

They will just say you made it up or that it hasnt been analysed by an expert.. and that is it.. oh and then cry "next" like they provided some amazing evidence in their politician type post.. you know the kind when they spend twenty minutes speaking and say nothing at all..

Yea.. no implications besides completely shattering any credibility held by the entire academic and scientific community.

It is in all their best interests to simply keep their heads down about this and go along to get along.



P.S. if you want to see some Nasa Shilling in all its glory check out this Apollo-Fraud thread

Thread: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax

OK so we have this huge radiation belt outside earth. Does that mean we are going to have to create some huge lead shielded hunk of shit just to get off our planet?

sensationalism doesn't sell long

I'm all for "thinking for yourself," but looking at a few pictures on the internet and coming to the conclusion that the moon landing was hoaxed is pretty ridiculous.

Do some research about the moon landing being real as well, then think for yourself.

Ok well this thread proves it. right?

you think this is what Obama is gonna talk about today at noon?

Ive witnessed countless conspiracies. and Im just letting the thread know, that sadly, nothing will become of this.

clavius.org

Good job

Original Post edited as follows:

Apollo astronauts did not bring back moon rocks, for the “moon rocks” contain numerous fossils of neurons and blood vessels, which could not have originated from our lifeless moon that had no atmosphere and little gravity . Fossilized neurons and blood vessels found in the “moon rocks” are identified in the following figures:
[link to www.wretch.cc]
[link to www.wretch.cc]

and described in the following posts:
[link to www.wretch.cc]

[link to www.wretch.cc]

[link to www.wretch.cc]

[link to www.wretch.cc]

[link to www.wretch.cc]

“Moon Rocks” could not be rocks or meteorites found on the moon, period.
If “Moon Rocks” were meteorites found on the moon and brought back to Earth by Apollo astronauts, at least some of the “moon rocks” should contain chondrites, as 86% of meteorites found on Earth do (ref. 1). However, none of the “moon rocks” contains chondrites (ref. 1). It’s impossible that Apollo astronauts found only achondrite meteorites on the moon.
Ref. 1: Wikipedia article on meteorites [link to en.wikipedia.org]
Quotes from Ref. 1:
“About 86% of the meteorites that fall on Earth are chondrites,…”
“Two small groups of achondrites are special, as they are younger and do not appear to come from the asteroid belt. One of these groups comes from the Moon, and includes rocks similar to those brought back to Earth by Apollo and Lunaprograms. The other group is almost certainly from Mars and are the only materials from other planets ever recovered by man.”

Last Edited by Wretch Fossil on 03/09/2012 11:21 PM

naziliars.org

Further evidence NASA faked moon rocks:

Scientists know for a long time that our moon has no magnetism. So, rocks collected on the moon should not be magnetic. But many moon rocks are magnetic. This further proves that NASA FAKED MOON ROCKS.

Honestly, I give a crap that it was fake.

I think the total mind fuck which is government released info leads people to a direction other than the loving arms of big brother.......kennedy/nam/moonshot/watergate/petro-dollar/rex​ 84/regan/nafta..gat/dem-rep false paradigm/twin towers/obama well everything/ron paul being cheated/vaccines/ndaa/fake science/fake news stories......if one lie falls then they ALL fall.....did you really need that explained to you

Added on March 16: Reasons for Above Claim

"Until the Apollo missions, many prominent scientists were convinced that the moon was born cold and stayed cold, never melting enough to form a liquid core." (Ref. A) Such a liquid core is essential for a long-lasting magnetic dynamo, which in turn is essential for the magnetism found in the "moon rocks". No one ever proved the Moon had a liquid core. (Ref. A)

The Moon has "pockets" or "areas" of "local" magnetism based on the distributed material in the crust, and on the small magnetic fields present in the alloys of ferromagnetic material there (that is, meteorites found ON the Moon) (Ref. B). Such local magnetism could not produce many magnetic "moon rocks" brought back by Apollo astronauts (Ref. A).

Ref. A: [link to www.space.com]
Ref. B:
[link to wiki.answers.com]

Added on March 16: Moon never had an atmosphere, as it had little gravity/magnetic field.

The Moon has no strong gravity or magnetic field, so there's
virtually no reason to expect it to maintain an atmosphere for any appreciable length of time (Ref. C). Anyway, the Moon was far more likely lifeless than otherwise. Or do you think the neuron fossils originated on the Moon?

Ref. C: [link to in.answers.yahoo.com]

Read more at [link to wretchfossil.blogspot.com]

Last Edited by Wretch Fossil on 03/15/2012 10:03 PM