For you BUSHTARDS who STILL DON´T GET IT: The truth from A FELLOW REPUBLICAN

Burn in hell, Mr. President

By DOUG THOMPSON
Nov 14, 2005, 07:51
Email this article


My first reaction when I read the transcript of President George W. Bush’s Veteran’s Day speech was anger. No, not anger. Rage. Blind rage.

How dare he, I thought. Not even the lowest, scum-sucking son of a bitch in politics would stoop to using a day to honor those who served to instead promote his lies-based, illegal, immoral exercise in mass murder called the invasion of Iraq.

Yes he would. George W. Bush is a pathetic, pitiless scrap of sub-human trash that lacks any shred of decency or morality. So why wouldn’t he desecrate the memories of those who serve our nation?

As a journalist, I’m expected to be dispassionate about events and those who shape them. But I cannot be so when it comes to Bush. He’s a liar and a traitor to the oath he swore when he became President of the country he now works so hard to destroy.

Bush is much, much more than just a bad president. He is a genuinely evil man, a raving lunatic who cannot face the fact that his insane policies have destroyed a once-great country called America. George Bush’s America is an arrogant bully distrusted by its allies, hated by most of the rest of the world and divided internally by his divisive, duplicitous actions.

I can no longer regard this maniac with journalistic dispassion. I may be a journalist but I’m an American first and, as an American, I cannot stand silent as a truly evil man destroys the country I love.

Polls show most Americans share my distrust of Bush. We all see him for what he is – a dishonest, opportunistic political beast who lets nothing stand in the way of his unbridled lust for power. He speaks of God at one moment and calls those who dare disagree with him “motherfuckers” the next. He has, without blinking an eye, sent more than 2,000 American military men and women, along with countless thousands of Iraqi civilians, to their deaths in a senseless invasion based on manufactured “evidence” and outright lies.

Then he has the gall to stand up on the day we set aside to honor those who served and continue to promote his lies and call those who see the truth traitors who aid the enemy.

Sorry George. Your lies don’t play here or with the majority of American citizens. It is you who has sold out your country, who is a traitor and who has committed treason against your office, your country and humanity.

God may one day forgive you for your sins but I cannot. Neither can the wives, husbands, parents and relatives of those you sent to die in your dirty little war. Neither can memories of those who served, those we honored on Veterans Day and those whose memory you so callously dishonored with your propagandist pap.

On second thought, I’m not even sure God can forgive you for what you have done. You have lied and you have killed and those are sins that even an understanding God may have trouble forgiving.

If there is justice in the afterlife, you will stand and face that justice for your sins. And may you burn in hell for them.

© Copyright 2005 by Capitol Hill Blue

Psycho Neurotic-

Here´s a little "light reading" for you regarding the WND´s in Iraq.....
--------------------------------------------
Filmmaker: No doubt Saddam had WMDs
Real question, he says, should be: Where did they go?

Posted: November 17, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com

The producer of a new documentary on Saddam Hussein says there is no question that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction.

The real question he says, should be: Where did they go?

Former real estate broker Brad L. Maaske interviewed dozens of Iraqis in producing his film "Weapon of Mass Destruction: The Murderous Reign of Saddam Hussein." He says it is absurd that prominent Democrats, including a former U.S. president, continue to say the former dictator did not possess WMDs.

"There´s interview after interview of people who say they saw truckloads of something going out through Syria and into the Bekaa Valley of Lebanon," he recalls. "And of course we´ve tried to track that as best we can. The U.S. military can´t go into Syria; it can´t go into Lebanon. But the question is: Where did those weapons go?"

Maaske says it does not take much to create a weapon of mass destruction.

"There didn´t have to be massive stockpiles of chemicals," he explains. "A few 55-gallon drums of a nerve gas could kill a million people if properly dispersed, so it´s not that difficult for him to get rid of what he had."

The documentary, now available on DVD, exposes the historical facts about Saddam´s rise to power, his world-defiant reign of terror, and the events leading to his demise. More than mere facts and figures, the work brings to life faces, names, and stories that encompass the unimaginable 1.3 million lives exterminated by Saddam´s reign of terror.

Frustrated by the media coverage about Saddam´s evil empire, Maaske left his lucrative career to buy a video camera and begin a quest to uncover the true story and give voice to those who could not be heard -- the Iraqi people.

Maaske´s journey led him around the world, from California to Iraq — to the gravesites and into the souls of the families shattered by the dictator.

From interviews with the prosecution team trying Saddam Hussein and Chemical Ali, to the framers of the Iraqi Constitution, to the Iraqi orphanages, to patrols with the Iraqi and U.S. forces in Iraq, "Weapon of Mass Destruction" provides long-overdue evidence that millions of people were living in a perpetual hell inflicted by Saddam.

"Weapon of Mass Destruction" reveals:

The span of Saddam´s rise to power, eventual demise, and progress in Iraq
Never-before-seen footage of chemical attacks, murders and torture leveled against the Kurdish population of Iraq spanning more than two decades
Intimate, never-before-revealed footage of the heroes of Sept. 11
The heart-wrenching interview with the parents of fallen soldier Daniel Unger and his memorial service in Maaske´s hometown in California.
In fact, in "WMD" Michael Moore gets the ambush interview treatment he often reserves for others. The filmmakers staked out his New York residence for days until he came out to meet the camera.

But the hard edge of "WMD" are eyewitness accounts and never-before-seen footage of chemical attacks, murders and torture leveled against the Kurdish population of Iraq dating from Saddam Hussein´s rise to power and spanning more than two decades.

Pivotal to Maaske´s decision to develop "WMD" was his meeting with Jano Rosebiani, an award-winning Kurdish movie director who had documented the atrocities in his film "Mass Graves." Rosebiani had lost family members during "Anfal," Hussein´s carefully orchestrated campaign of genocide targeting Kurds in northern Iraq from 1986 to 1988.

"When I saw Jano Rosebiani´s film, it broke my heart," Maaske said. "I knew this was a story that had to be told, but until now, no one had stepped up to the plate to tell it."

Also important to the story are scenes from "Chemical Ali," a documentary by Kurdish filmmaker Kawa Akrawi, who assisted in the production of "WMD."

At least 182,000 Kurds in Iraq were murdered or are missing and presumed dead. Entire villages were razed. Authorities on Iraq estimate that 1.3 million people have died as a direct result of Hussein´s acts of terror since 1979.

The movie includes moments of comic relief and powerful imagery from the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States.

"Weapon of Mass Destruction: The Rise and Fall of Iraq´s Murderous Dictator"

AC.. you are wasting your time with showing them the WMDs... they will NEVER admit that there was any and still is some.. they will NOT read the evidence.. they will not watch the documentary(this is the part where somebody says "Micheal Moore")

Because they CANNOT.. in their warped and tiny minds.. they are POSITIVE that Bush is evil!! and a Liar!! and the ANTICHRIST FASCIST MONKEYTARD!!! or some other such nonsense...

This whole charade is because they LOST to him and are almost psychotic erotic insane with rage...

They cannot believe that they are not in power anymore and will do anything to get the conservatives out before they correct any of the marxist institutions they have created....

ANYTHING..

I remember a memo that came out and got it´s 1.5 seconds of fame(it looked bad for the left.. so the MSM didn´t cover it except in passing..)

This is a planned strategy by the dumbocraps.. they are the ones using the tactics they ascribe to the right.. they are the ones repeating the "big lie" until it becomes truth...

Over and Over.. day after day.. they are fighting the evil Bush with their "light" and "truth"... hammering the point.. hammer.. hammer.. MC hammer....

They are trying to brainwash the american public by repetition.... learning them by "rote".. and theywill allow NO INFORMATION that debunks their "big lie".

If 15 nuclear warheads of Iraqi/North Korean origin were found today in the sands outside of Sadr City... The left would rush to the cameras and reporters to denounce the existance of those missiles...

Anything for power.. Stop wasting your time AC.. just call em morons and marxists.. and let´s get on with the "neocon" agenda that they are truly helpless and powerless to stop.

(Does it ever bother you lefties that even though you are crying havoc with every breath.. the conservatives just keep on keepin´ on? It would bother me.)

"According to the MoveOn.org crowd there aren´t/weren´t any...."

No according to UN weapons inspectors IN IRAQ, there weren´t any WMD. They only left because Dubya couldn´t wait any longer to unleash his war hard-on. They were going to attack us at any moment with their imaginary "chemical weapons drones" and launch their fantasy ICBM´s topped with invisible nukes if we didn´t attack right that minute.

You unpatriotic pieces of shit are going to have to be excised like a nasty little tumor, I think, much like Nazism was stamped out in Germany after WWII.

"No dave.. anyone who is inherently dishonest in public and in private and within themselves is a liberal. Check out the mirror.. you can find the answer there."


Sinanju; you are a complete fucking idiot.

Liberal/Conservative--its way beyond that--GROW UP--that is what they want people discussing!! while they divi up ypur dollars
________________________________________________
´´´Weapon of Mass Destruction: The Rise and Fall of Iraq´s Murderous Dictator"´´´

Which Dictator are you talking about--Iraq´s China´s, Iran´s Israel´s or the U.S
-AND- there are many more --so many to go around--
U people go round and round--Bush/Cheney didnt mis-lead---they just came to this conclusion 3/4 years before he took office-He knew exactly what he wanted --with approval--to do. People were just not looking.

Imagine that--in his quest for election --instead of saying --"im a uniter--not a divider"--He said im going to kill/capture that S O B who tried to kill my Daddy and in the process --we will get his oil and protect Israel and lots of people will die --because im going to put all--NON MILITARY--in charge of the operations--AND give them Medals Of Honor --after they screw things up beyond repair.

They needed a reason--WTC-Get Osama--have they??? they need a face on the enemy--so people dont see the real ones.While we are at it--Lets get this thing done that we talked about 4 years ago and FUxk THE GENERALS--what do they know?--

TO make all of you happy--IT IS CLINTONS FAULT FOR GETTING a BJ ETC--He allowed these people in the door--And Bush still needed a favorable ruling to get there

Maybe so.. but at least I can spell a word that I just read.. AA.

The name is Sinanju, you idiot marxist.

always take as deep breath and remember that the re-pukes and dem-pukes are wholly owned subsidiaries of big business.

they just love to watch us feud like two football teams.

we are the dumb fuck, run them all outta dodge.

always take as deep breath and remember that the re-pukes and dem-pukes are wholly owned subsidiaries of big business.

they just love to watch us feud like two football teams.

we are the dumb fuck, run them all outta dodge.

Ow that cut deep. I misspelled your name and you called me out on it before I corrected it. At the very least you admit you´re a complete fucking idiot.

Actually, I agreed that it is a possibility.. but then again, I suppose that is close enough for a liberal.

Reading comprehension is not their strong suit.

A weapon of mass destruction is a nuke. Nothing else. The media has confused everyone on this issue. Saddam had some nasty weaponry in his arsenal but he had EVERY RIGHT to have them. National soveriagnty gave Iraq the right to it´s weaponry. Saddam did NOT have nukes and therefore had NO weapons of mass destruction. He also had no way of DELIVERING ANY weapons ourside of a 90 mile radius on Iraq. The United States and basically the whole world was not at any risk from Iraq. The invasion of Iraq was illegal under ALL standards.

Sinanju, seriously, do you ride the extra short bus to school?

Sinanju why the ad hominem attacks against liberals? You don´t even know what a liberal IS. By the way, demographically, liberals are well educated and wealthier than Conservatives who are generally poorly educated. Liberals skew demographically to higher IQs while Conservatives skew to lowers IQs. That´s just how it is.

No.

Why do you ask? Are you looking for company?

Wow! That sounds like political discrimnation Monty.

How un-progressive of you.

I ask because your sense of logical reasoning and common sense seem to be incredibly low. Almost non-existant even.

You might call it political discrimination but it is in fact merely demographic certainty. All people can be divided into groups for purposes of deeper demographic understanding.

Do you guys know what Sinanju is.

Ever see the movie Remo Williams. IT was a movie from the Destroyer series. Sinanju is what the korean master taught Remo.

So Sinanju takes the name from that martial art from that series.

Its also the real name of a city in North Korea on the coast.

So "sinanju"

what do think of the "martail art" portrayed in the series. YOu a fan. Believe you represent the art. have its "strenght".

IF so, I ask you this.

"Never cut a man with words. They become a weapon against you."

Monty-

"Sinanju why the ad hominem attacks against liberals? You don´t even know what a liberal IS. By the way, demographically, liberals are well educated and wealthier than Conservatives who are generally poorly educated. Liberals skew demographically to higher IQs while Conservatives skew to lowers IQs. That´s just how it is."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Which in the "real world" (you know, the one outside your obviously *superior* pointy headed academic socialist utopia) means WHAT?

Having higher intelligence means ABSOLUTELY NOTHING if you don´t utilize it. I´ll take "street smarts" over "book smarts" ANY DAY!

There are plenty of wealthy Democrats & Republicans, I don´t recall the Forbes 500 list being dominated by one political persuasion over the other!?!?

just want to point out the following:

[link to www.cnn.com]


December 16, 1998
Web posted at: 8:51 p.m. EST (0151 GMT)

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- From the Oval Office, President Clinton told the nation Wednesday evening why he ordered new military strikes against Iraq.

The president said Iraq´s refusal to cooperate with U.N. weapons inspectors presented a threat to the entire world.

"Saddam (Hussein) must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons," Clinton said.

Operation Desert Fox, a strong, sustained series of attacks, will be carried out over several days by U.S. and British forces, Clinton said.

"Earlier today I ordered America´s armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces," Clinton said.

"Their mission is to attack Iraq´s nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors," said Clinton.

Clinton also stated that, while other countries also had weapons of mass destruction, Hussein is in a different category because he has used such weapons against his own people and against his neighbors.


´Without delay, diplomacy or warning´

The Iraqi leader was given a final warning six weeks ago, Clinton said, when Baghdad promised to cooperate with U.N. inspectors at the last minute just as U.S. warplanes were headed its way.

"Along with Prime Minister (Tony) Blair of Great Britain, I made it equally clear that if Saddam failed to cooperate fully we would be prepared to act without delay, diplomacy or warning," Clinton said.

The president said the report handed in Tuesday by Richard Butler, head of the United Nations Special Commission in charge of finding and destroying Iraqi weapons, was stark and sobering.

Iraq failed to cooperate with the inspectors and placed new restrictions on them, Clinton said. He said Iraqi officials also destroyed records and moved everything, even the furniture, out of suspected sites before inspectors were allowed in.

"Instead of inspectors disarming Saddam, Saddam has disarmed the inspectors," Clinton said.

"In halting our airstrikes in November, I gave Saddam a chance -- not a license. If we turn our backs on his defiance, the credibility of U.S. power as a check against Saddam will be destroyed," the president .d.


Strikes necessary to stunt weapons programs

Clinton said he made the decision to strike Wednesday with the unanimous agreement of his security advisors.

Timing was important, said the president, because without a strong inspection system in place, Iraq could rebuild its chemical, biological and nuclear programs in a matter of months, not years.

"If Saddam can cripple the weapons inspections system and get away with it, he would conclude the international community, led by the United States, has simply lost its will," said Clinton. "He would surmise that he has free rein to rebuild his arsenal of destruction."

Clinton also called Hussein a threat to his people and to the security of the world.


"The best way to end that threat once and for all is with a new Iraqi government -- a government ready to live in peace with its neighbors, a government that respects the rights of its people," Clinton said.

Such a change in Baghdad would take time and effort, Clinton said, adding that his administration would work with Iraqi opposition forces.

Clinton also addressed the ongoing impeachment crisis in the White House.

"Saddam Hussein and the other enemies of peace may have thought that the serious debate currently before the House of Representatives would distract Americans or weaken our resolve to face him down," he said.

"But once more, the United States has proven that although we are never eager to use force, when we must act in America´s vital interests, we will do so."

ACV1.0 that is because you have never LOOKED for information about the political make-up of the Forbes list. More than 80% of the officers of corporations in north America are liberals.

We really don´t need to argue it as these are facts I work with every day in my work life. I shared it with you all as a favour, but it is no skin off my nose if you don´t believe. In fact I will simply make a note in my files that on a one on one basis I have personally seen the truth of the demographic divide borne out.

Is Clinton a liberal?


And as for the master´s words.. I am a pre-sun source night tiger.

I am sure if you are as well versed as you seem to be then you understand that... I use weapons and mine ARE words.

And the north Korean town id called Sinuiji.. but you were pretty close for a liberal.

"GENERAL INFORMATION
National name Chosun Minchu-chui Inmin Konghwa-guk/Democratic People´s Republic of Korea Area 120,538 sq km/46,539 sq mi Capital Pyongyang Major towns/cities Hamhung, Chongjin, Nampo, Wonsan, >>>>Sinuiji<<<< Physical features wide coastal plain in west rising to mountains cut by deep valleys in interior"

Sinanju to answer your question on Clinton, he is a fiscal conservative and a social liberal. There are no real liberals in the US political scene.

Cynthia Mckinney?

That little "elf" dude.. Dennis Kucinich?

Not liberals?

umm.. okay...


(But I agree about Clinton... and he ain´t that much of a social liberal... case in point.. "don´t ask, don´t tell")

Correct. They are not true Liberals. All of the people in US political discourse are to the right of centre.

Hi,

My name is Tina.

I'm excited to be part of this large and growing forum of great people and thankyou all for making me feel welcome. I just joined today.

My special interests or skills are:
- HTML
- SEO
- Web design
- Internet business

I am happy to help others that need it and offer advice where possible :)