Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,366 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 290,103
Pageviews Today: 580,658Threads Today: 278Posts Today: 5,770
12:27 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Dear "The Nobody"

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13781711
United States
04/12/2012 03:35 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Dear "The Nobody"
What are you? What is your purpose? Do you know if you're here for good or for evil yet? Do you think love is the real reason you're here? Or the destruction of all mankind? Or none of the above?

Speak your truth. Your own truth. No one else's. In the core of your being...what is your purpose in this existence?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13774413
United States
04/12/2012 03:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Dear "The Nobody"
sideways
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3573141
United States
04/12/2012 03:45 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Dear "The Nobody"
What are you? What is your purpose? Do you know if you're here for good or for evil yet? Do you think love is the real reason you're here? Or the destruction of all mankind? Or none of the above?

Speak your truth. Your own truth. No one else's. In the core of your being...what is your purpose in this existence?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13781711


Tell you the truth its sounds like there is 2 nobody's. I don't for sure. Some twisting stuff going on right now and everything is getting more confusing by the minute. But this one wants to bring life back into people. I can't speak for anyone else. But unfortunalely some of the info that gets put out ends up being used for bad things. NUKES and what not. But it also has to be put out to complete everything. And to tell you the truth GLP was kind enough to give me posting privilages back. But its hit or miss. I get banned alot. And then I leave it up to them if they want me to post. Sometimes the do sometimes they dont. I don't change my IP's. Either you want me to post or you don't. I'll tell you what this is the only information I am going to put out just to wake people up. I may post again but right now I have to be reserve not get the zombie information into the wrong hands...even thought JPM paid for some of these relases by people who worked hard for them. They gave them to me to save them. They gave them to me for free. So I am giving back to them life in the end. I didn't pay for them and I am not selling them. The otherside is doing it wrong.



In neuroscience, Dale's Principle (or Dale's Law) is a rule attributed to the English neuroscientist Henry Hallett Dale. The principle basically states that a neuron performs the same chemical action at all of its synaptic connections to other cells, regardless of the identity of the target cell. However, there has been disagreement about the precise wording.

Because of an ambiguity in the original statement, there are actually two versions of the principle, one that has been shown definitively to be false, and another that remains a valuable rule of thumb. The term "Dale's Principle" was first used by Sir John Eccles in 1954, in a passage reading, "In conformity with Dale's principle (1934, 1952) that the same chemical transmitter is released from all the synaptic terminals of a neurone…"[1][2] Some modern writers have understood the principle to state that neurons release one and only one transmitter at all of their synapses. Others, including Eccles himself in later publications, have taken it to mean that neurons release the same set of transmitters at all of their synapses.

Dale himself never stated his "principle" in an explicit form. The source that Eccles referred to was a lecture published by Dale in 1934, called Pharmacology and nerve endings, describing some of the early research into the physiology of neurotransmission.[3] At that time, only two chemical transmitters were known, acetylcholine and noradrenaline (then thought to be adrenaline).[4] In the peripheral nervous system, cholinergic and adrenergic transmission were known to arise from different groups of nerve fibers. Dale was interested in the possibility that a neuron releasing one of these chemicals in the periphery might also release the same chemical at central synapses. He wrote:


It is to be noted, further, that in the cases for which direct evidence is already available, the phenomena of regeneration appear to indicate that the nature of the chemical function, whether cholinergic or adrenergic, is characteristic for each particular neurone, and unchangeable.[3]

And near the end of the paper:


When we are dealing with two different endings of the same sensory neurone, the one peripheral and concerned with vaso-dilatation and the other at a central synapse, can we suppose that-the discovery and identification of a chemical transmitter of axon-reflex vasodilatation would furnish a hint as to the nature of the transmission process at a central synapse? The possibility has at least some value as a stimulus to further experiment.[3]

With only two transmitter chemicals known to exist at the time, the possibility of a neuron releasing more than one transmitter at a single synapse did not enter anybody's mind, and so no care was taken to frame hypotheses in a way that took this possibility into account. The resulting ambiguity in the initial statements led to some confusion in the literature about the precise meaning of the principle.[5] Nicoll and Malenka, for example, understood it to state that a neuron always releases one and only one neurotransmitter at all of its synapses.[6] In this form it is certainly false. Many neurons are capable of releasing more than one neurotransmitter, in what is called "cotransmission". The discovery of this phenomenon was relatively recent: although there were earlier hints, the first formal proposal did not come until 1976.[7] Recent studies in a myriad of systems have shown that most, if not all, neurons release several different chemical messengers.[8]

In a 1976 publication, however, Eccles reinterpreted the principle in a subtly different way:


"I proposed that Dale’s Principle be defined as stating that at all the axonal branches of a neurone, there was liberation of the same transmitter substance or substances."[9]

The addition of "or substances" is critical. With this change, the principle allows for the possibility of neurons releasing more than one transmitter, and only asserts that the same set are released at all synapses. In this form, it continues to be an important rule of thumb, with only a few known exceptions.,[10] including David Sulzer and Stephen Rayport's finding that dopamine neurons also release glutamate as a neurotransmitter, but at separate release sites.[11] In modern neuroscience, neurons are often classified by their neurotransmitter and most important cotransmitter, for example striatal GABA neurons utilize either opioid peptides or substance P as the primary cotransmitter.

Neurons in a class without a subpopulation of inhibitory interneurons can release at least two neurotransmitters at the same time, the other being a cotransmitter, in order to provide the stabilizing negative feedback required for meaningful encoding.[12] Examples include:
GABA — glycine co-release.
Dopamine — glutamate co-release.
Acetylcholine — glutamate co-release.
Acetylcholine (ACh) — vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) co-release.
Acetylcholine (ACh) — calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) co-release.
Glutamate — dynorphin co-release (in Hippocampus).
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13774413
United States
04/12/2012 03:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Dear "The Nobody"
oh...Binary...good one....sideways sideways
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 13781711
United States
04/12/2012 03:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Dear "The Nobody"
What are you? What is your purpose? Do you know if you're here for good or for evil yet? Do you think love is the real reason you're here? Or the destruction of all mankind? Or none of the above?

Speak your truth. Your own truth. No one else's. In the core of your being...what is your purpose in this existence?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13781711


Tell you the truth its sounds like there is 2 nobody's. I don't for sure. Some twisting stuff going on right now and everything is getting more confusing by the minute. But this one wants to bring life back into people. I can't speak for anyone else. But unfortunalely some of the info that gets put out ends up being used for bad things. NUKES and what not. But it also has to be put out to complete everything. And to tell you the truth GLP was kind enough to give me posting privilages back. But its hit or miss. I get banned alot. And then I leave it up to them if they want me to post. Sometimes the do sometimes they dont. I don't change my IP's. Either you want me to post or you don't. I'll tell you what this is the only information I am going to put out just to wake people up. I may post again but right now I have to be reserve not get the zombie information into the wrong hands...even thought JPM paid for some of these relases by people who worked hard for them. They gave them to me to save them. They gave them to me for free. So I am giving back to them life in the end. I didn't pay for them and I am not selling them. The otherside is doing it wrong.



In neuroscience, Dale's Principle (or Dale's Law) is a rule attributed to the English neuroscientist Henry Hallett Dale. The principle basically states that a neuron performs the same chemical action at all of its synaptic connections to other cells, regardless of the identity of the target cell. However, there has been disagreement about the precise wording.

Because of an ambiguity in the original statement, there are actually two versions of the principle, one that has been shown definitively to be false, and another that remains a valuable rule of thumb. The term "Dale's Principle" was first used by Sir John Eccles in 1954, in a passage reading, "In conformity with Dale's principle (1934, 1952) that the same chemical transmitter is released from all the synaptic terminals of a neurone…"[1][2] Some modern writers have understood the principle to state that neurons release one and only one transmitter at all of their synapses. Others, including Eccles himself in later publications, have taken it to mean that neurons release the same set of transmitters at all of their synapses.

Dale himself never stated his "principle" in an explicit form. The source that Eccles referred to was a lecture published by Dale in 1934, called Pharmacology and nerve endings, describing some of the early research into the physiology of neurotransmission.[3] At that time, only two chemical transmitters were known, acetylcholine and noradrenaline (then thought to be adrenaline).[4] In the peripheral nervous system, cholinergic and adrenergic transmission were known to arise from different groups of nerve fibers. Dale was interested in the possibility that a neuron releasing one of these chemicals in the periphery might also release the same chemical at central synapses. He wrote:


It is to be noted, further, that in the cases for which direct evidence is already available, the phenomena of regeneration appear to indicate that the nature of the chemical function, whether cholinergic or adrenergic, is characteristic for each particular neurone, and unchangeable.[3]

And near the end of the paper:


When we are dealing with two different endings of the same sensory neurone, the one peripheral and concerned with vaso-dilatation and the other at a central synapse, can we suppose that-the discovery and identification of a chemical transmitter of axon-reflex vasodilatation would furnish a hint as to the nature of the transmission process at a central synapse? The possibility has at least some value as a stimulus to further experiment.[3]

With only two transmitter chemicals known to exist at the time, the possibility of a neuron releasing more than one transmitter at a single synapse did not enter anybody's mind, and so no care was taken to frame hypotheses in a way that took this possibility into account. The resulting ambiguity in the initial statements led to some confusion in the literature about the precise meaning of the principle.[5] Nicoll and Malenka, for example, understood it to state that a neuron always releases one and only one neurotransmitter at all of its synapses.[6] In this form it is certainly false. Many neurons are capable of releasing more than one neurotransmitter, in what is called "cotransmission". The discovery of this phenomenon was relatively recent: although there were earlier hints, the first formal proposal did not come until 1976.[7] Recent studies in a myriad of systems have shown that most, if not all, neurons release several different chemical messengers.[8]

In a 1976 publication, however, Eccles reinterpreted the principle in a subtly different way:


"I proposed that Dale’s Principle be defined as stating that at all the axonal branches of a neurone, there was liberation of the same transmitter substance or substances."[9]

The addition of "or substances" is critical. With this change, the principle allows for the possibility of neurons releasing more than one transmitter, and only asserts that the same set are released at all synapses. In this form, it continues to be an important rule of thumb, with only a few known exceptions.,[10] including David Sulzer and Stephen Rayport's finding that dopamine neurons also release glutamate as a neurotransmitter, but at separate release sites.[11] In modern neuroscience, neurons are often classified by their neurotransmitter and most important cotransmitter, for example striatal GABA neurons utilize either opioid peptides or substance P as the primary cotransmitter.

Neurons in a class without a subpopulation of inhibitory interneurons can release at least two neurotransmitters at the same time, the other being a cotransmitter, in order to provide the stabilizing negative feedback required for meaningful encoding.[12] Examples include:
GABA — glycine co-release.
Dopamine — glutamate co-release.
Acetylcholine — glutamate co-release.
Acetylcholine (ACh) — vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) co-release.
Acetylcholine (ACh) — calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) co-release.
Glutamate — dynorphin co-release (in Hippocampus).
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3573141


Please continue...I'm not sure what you are getting at...

Is he schizophrenic? Or are there actually 2 beings...?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13774413
United States
04/12/2012 03:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Dear "The Nobody"
What are you? What is your purpose? Do you know if you're here for good or for evil yet? Do you think love is the real reason you're here? Or the destruction of all mankind? Or none of the above?

Speak your truth. Your own truth. No one else's. In the core of your being...what is your purpose in this existence?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13781711


Tell you the truth its sounds like there is 2 nobody's. I don't for sure. Some twisting stuff going on right now and everything is getting more confusing by the minute. But this one wants to bring life back into people. I can't speak for anyone else. But unfortunalely some of the info that gets put out ends up being used for bad things. NUKES and what not. But it also has to be put out to complete everything. And to tell you the truth GLP was kind enough to give me posting privilages back. But its hit or miss. I get banned alot. And then I leave it up to them if they want me to post. Sometimes the do sometimes they dont. I don't change my IP's. Either you want me to post or you don't. I'll tell you what this is the only information I am going to put out just to wake people up. I may post again but right now I have to be reserve not get the zombie information into the wrong hands...even thought JPM paid for some of these relases by people who worked hard for them. They gave them to me to save them. They gave them to me for free. So I am giving back to them life in the end. I didn't pay for them and I am not selling them. The otherside is doing it wrong.



In neuroscience, Dale's Principle (or Dale's Law) is a rule attributed to the English neuroscientist Henry Hallett Dale. The principle basically states that a neuron performs the same chemical action at all of its synaptic connections to other cells, regardless of the identity of the target cell. However, there has been disagreement about the precise wording.

Because of an ambiguity in the original statement, there are actually two versions of the principle, one that has been shown definitively to be false, and another that remains a valuable rule of thumb. The term "Dale's Principle" was first used by Sir John Eccles in 1954, in a passage reading, "In conformity with Dale's principle (1934, 1952) that the same chemical transmitter is released from all the synaptic terminals of a neurone…"[1][2] Some modern writers have understood the principle to state that neurons release one and only one transmitter at all of their synapses. Others, including Eccles himself in later publications, have taken it to mean that neurons release the same set of transmitters at all of their synapses.

Dale himself never stated his "principle" in an explicit form. The source that Eccles referred to was a lecture published by Dale in 1934, called Pharmacology and nerve endings, describing some of the early research into the physiology of neurotransmission.[3] At that time, only two chemical transmitters were known, acetylcholine and noradrenaline (then thought to be adrenaline).[4] In the peripheral nervous system, cholinergic and adrenergic transmission were known to arise from different groups of nerve fibers. Dale was interested in the possibility that a neuron releasing one of these chemicals in the periphery might also release the same chemical at central synapses. He wrote:


It is to be noted, further, that in the cases for which direct evidence is already available, the phenomena of regeneration appear to indicate that the nature of the chemical function, whether cholinergic or adrenergic, is characteristic for each particular neurone, and unchangeable.[3]

And near the end of the paper:


When we are dealing with two different endings of the same sensory neurone, the one peripheral and concerned with vaso-dilatation and the other at a central synapse, can we suppose that-the discovery and identification of a chemical transmitter of axon-reflex vasodilatation would furnish a hint as to the nature of the transmission process at a central synapse? The possibility has at least some value as a stimulus to further experiment.[3]

With only two transmitter chemicals known to exist at the time, the possibility of a neuron releasing more than one transmitter at a single synapse did not enter anybody's mind, and so no care was taken to frame hypotheses in a way that took this possibility into account. The resulting ambiguity in the initial statements led to some confusion in the literature about the precise meaning of the principle.[5] Nicoll and Malenka, for example, understood it to state that a neuron always releases one and only one neurotransmitter at all of its synapses.[6] In this form it is certainly false. Many neurons are capable of releasing more than one neurotransmitter, in what is called "cotransmission". The discovery of this phenomenon was relatively recent: although there were earlier hints, the first formal proposal did not come until 1976.[7] Recent studies in a myriad of systems have shown that most, if not all, neurons release several different chemical messengers.[8]

In a 1976 publication, however, Eccles reinterpreted the principle in a subtly different way:


"I proposed that Dale’s Principle be defined as stating that at all the axonal branches of a neurone, there was liberation of the same transmitter substance or substances."[9]

The addition of "or substances" is critical. With this change, the principle allows for the possibility of neurons releasing more than one transmitter, and only asserts that the same set are released at all synapses. In this form, it continues to be an important rule of thumb, with only a few known exceptions.,[10] including David Sulzer and Stephen Rayport's finding that dopamine neurons also release glutamate as a neurotransmitter, but at separate release sites.[11] In modern neuroscience, neurons are often classified by their neurotransmitter and most important cotransmitter, for example striatal GABA neurons utilize either opioid peptides or substance P as the primary cotransmitter.

Neurons in a class without a subpopulation of inhibitory interneurons can release at least two neurotransmitters at the same time, the other being a cotransmitter, in order to provide the stabilizing negative feedback required for meaningful encoding.[12] Examples include:
GABA — glycine co-release.
Dopamine — glutamate co-release.
Acetylcholine — glutamate co-release.
Acetylcholine (ACh) — vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) co-release.
Acetylcholine (ACh) — calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) co-release.
Glutamate — dynorphin co-release (in Hippocampus).
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3573141


Please continue...I'm not sure what you are getting at...

Is he schizophrenic? Or are there actually 2 beings...?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13781711


yes yes....please sideways
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 13781711
United States
04/12/2012 03:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Dear "The Nobody"
Because I think you're right. About there being 2. But not sure if it's multiple personalities, or actually 2 people.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 13781711
United States
04/12/2012 03:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Dear "The Nobody"
yes yes....please sideways


Lmao, you realize your obvious trolling is so obviously a ploy to end this thread...which just makes others even MORE curious about being said right?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3337823
United States
04/12/2012 03:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Dear "The Nobody"
love... that's more than text on a screen or meaningless words out of a mouth.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 13781711
United States
04/12/2012 04:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Dear "The Nobody"
Lmao, you realize your obvious trolling is so obviously a ploy to end this thread...which just makes others even MORE curious about being said right?



*about what's being said
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13774413
United States
04/12/2012 04:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Dear "The Nobody"
I dont speak engrish sideways
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3573141
United States
04/12/2012 04:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Dear "The Nobody"
What are you? What is your purpose? Do you know if you're here for good or for evil yet? Do you think love is the real reason you're here? Or the destruction of all mankind? Or none of the above?

Speak your truth. Your own truth. No one else's. In the core of your being...what is your purpose in this existence?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13781711


Tell you the truth its sounds like there is 2 nobody's. I don't for sure. Some twisting stuff going on right now and everything is getting more confusing by the minute. But this one wants to bring life back into people. I can't speak for anyone else. But unfortunalely some of the info that gets put out ends up being used for bad things. NUKES and what not. But it also has to be put out to complete everything. And to tell you the truth GLP was kind enough to give me posting privilages back. But its hit or miss. I get banned alot. And then I leave it up to them if they want me to post. Sometimes the do sometimes they dont. I don't change my IP's. Either you want me to post or you don't. I'll tell you what this is the only information I am going to put out just to wake people up. I may post again but right now I have to be reserve not get the zombie information into the wrong hands...even thought JPM paid for some of these relases by people who worked hard for them. They gave them to me to save them. They gave them to me for free. So I am giving back to them life in the end. I didn't pay for them and I am not selling them. The otherside is doing it wrong.



In neuroscience, Dale's Principle (or Dale's Law) is a rule attributed to the English neuroscientist Henry Hallett Dale. The principle basically states that a neuron performs the same chemical action at all of its synaptic connections to other cells, regardless of the identity of the target cell. However, there has been disagreement about the precise wording.

Because of an ambiguity in the original statement, there are actually two versions of the principle, one that has been shown definitively to be false, and another that remains a valuable rule of thumb. The term "Dale's Principle" was first used by Sir John Eccles in 1954, in a passage reading, "In conformity with Dale's principle (1934, 1952) that the same chemical transmitter is released from all the synaptic terminals of a neurone…"[1][2] Some modern writers have understood the principle to state that neurons release one and only one transmitter at all of their synapses. Others, including Eccles himself in later publications, have taken it to mean that neurons release the same set of transmitters at all of their synapses.

Dale himself never stated his "principle" in an explicit form. The source that Eccles referred to was a lecture published by Dale in 1934, called Pharmacology and nerve endings, describing some of the early research into the physiology of neurotransmission.[3] At that time, only two chemical transmitters were known, acetylcholine and noradrenaline (then thought to be adrenaline).[4] In the peripheral nervous system, cholinergic and adrenergic transmission were known to arise from different groups of nerve fibers. Dale was interested in the possibility that a neuron releasing one of these chemicals in the periphery might also release the same chemical at central synapses. He wrote:


It is to be noted, further, that in the cases for which direct evidence is already available, the phenomena of regeneration appear to indicate that the nature of the chemical function, whether cholinergic or adrenergic, is characteristic for each particular neurone, and unchangeable.[3]

And near the end of the paper:


When we are dealing with two different endings of the same sensory neurone, the one peripheral and concerned with vaso-dilatation and the other at a central synapse, can we suppose that-the discovery and identification of a chemical transmitter of axon-reflex vasodilatation would furnish a hint as to the nature of the transmission process at a central synapse? The possibility has at least some value as a stimulus to further experiment.[3]

With only two transmitter chemicals known to exist at the time, the possibility of a neuron releasing more than one transmitter at a single synapse did not enter anybody's mind, and so no care was taken to frame hypotheses in a way that took this possibility into account. The resulting ambiguity in the initial statements led to some confusion in the literature about the precise meaning of the principle.[5] Nicoll and Malenka, for example, understood it to state that a neuron always releases one and only one neurotransmitter at all of its synapses.[6] In this form it is certainly false. Many neurons are capable of releasing more than one neurotransmitter, in what is called "cotransmission". The discovery of this phenomenon was relatively recent: although there were earlier hints, the first formal proposal did not come until 1976.[7] Recent studies in a myriad of systems have shown that most, if not all, neurons release several different chemical messengers.[8]

In a 1976 publication, however, Eccles reinterpreted the principle in a subtly different way:


"I proposed that Dale’s Principle be defined as stating that at all the axonal branches of a neurone, there was liberation of the same transmitter substance or substances."[9]

The addition of "or substances" is critical. With this change, the principle allows for the possibility of neurons releasing more than one transmitter, and only asserts that the same set are released at all synapses. In this form, it continues to be an important rule of thumb, with only a few known exceptions.,[10] including David Sulzer and Stephen Rayport's finding that dopamine neurons also release glutamate as a neurotransmitter, but at separate release sites.[11] In modern neuroscience, neurons are often classified by their neurotransmitter and most important cotransmitter, for example striatal GABA neurons utilize either opioid peptides or substance P as the primary cotransmitter.

Neurons in a class without a subpopulation of inhibitory interneurons can release at least two neurotransmitters at the same time, the other being a cotransmitter, in order to provide the stabilizing negative feedback required for meaningful encoding.[12] Examples include:
GABA — glycine co-release.
Dopamine — glutamate co-release.
Acetylcholine — glutamate co-release.
Acetylcholine (ACh) — vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) co-release.
Acetylcholine (ACh) — calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) co-release.
Glutamate — dynorphin co-release (in Hippocampus).
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3573141


Please continue...I'm not sure what you are getting at...

Is he schizophrenic? Or are there actually 2 beings...?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13781711


If you go by scripture Zechariah chapter 4 There two that are anointed that are with the lord of the whole earth. Then there is the evil one. So you are looking 4 entities one being the Lord of the earth.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14230566
United States
04/12/2012 04:03 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Dear "The Nobody"
King Tut's brother Ra the Egyptian Sun God has a "techni-color motorhome", (a bad case of venereal diseases).






While the music played you worked by candlelight
Those San Francisco nights
You were the best in town
Just by chance you crossed the diamond with the pearl
You turned it on the world
That's when you turned the world around
Did you feel like Jesus
Did you realize
That you were a champion in their eyes
On the hill the stuff was laced with kerosene
But yours was kitchen clean
Everyone stopped to stare at your technicolor motor home
Every A-Frame had your number on the wall
You must have had it all
You'd go to L.A. on a dare
And you'd go it alone
Could you live forever
Could you see the day
Could you feel your whole world fall apart and fade away
etc
more at link
[link to www.youtube.com]
Draakenvuur

User ID: 14244224
South Africa
04/12/2012 04:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Dear "The Nobody"
Change.

The world needs to change.

No, not the world. The people.

The people need to change.

There is no damnation or salvation.

There is only neutrality. As it is in all of existance.

You represent chaos.

We represent order.









































I'm not The Nobody. I am just no one. Same as everyone.
None is as blind as he who refuses to see.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 13781711
United States
04/12/2012 04:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Dear "The Nobody"
What are you? What is your purpose? Do you know if you're here for good or for evil yet? Do you think love is the real reason you're here? Or the destruction of all mankind? Or none of the above?

Speak your truth. Your own truth. No one else's. In the core of your being...what is your purpose in this existence?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13781711


Tell you the truth its sounds like there is 2 nobody's. I don't for sure. Some twisting stuff going on right now and everything is getting more confusing by the minute. But this one wants to bring life back into people. I can't speak for anyone else. But unfortunalely some of the info that gets put out ends up being used for bad things. NUKES and what not. But it also has to be put out to complete everything. And to tell you the truth GLP was kind enough to give me posting privilages back. But its hit or miss. I get banned alot. And then I leave it up to them if they want me to post. Sometimes the do sometimes they dont. I don't change my IP's. Either you want me to post or you don't. I'll tell you what this is the only information I am going to put out just to wake people up. I may post again but right now I have to be reserve not get the zombie information into the wrong hands...even thought JPM paid for some of these relases by people who worked hard for them. They gave them to me to save them. They gave them to me for free. So I am giving back to them life in the end. I didn't pay for them and I am not selling them. The otherside is doing it wrong.



In neuroscience, Dale's Principle (or Dale's Law) is a rule attributed to the English neuroscientist Henry Hallett Dale. The principle basically states that a neuron performs the same chemical action at all of its synaptic connections to other cells, regardless of the identity of the target cell. However, there has been disagreement about the precise wording.

Because of an ambiguity in the original statement, there are actually two versions of the principle, one that has been shown definitively to be false, and another that remains a valuable rule of thumb. The term "Dale's Principle" was first used by Sir John Eccles in 1954, in a passage reading, "In conformity with Dale's principle (1934, 1952) that the same chemical transmitter is released from all the synaptic terminals of a neurone…"[1][2] Some modern writers have understood the principle to state that neurons release one and only one transmitter at all of their synapses. Others, including Eccles himself in later publications, have taken it to mean that neurons release the same set of transmitters at all of their synapses.

Dale himself never stated his "principle" in an explicit form. The source that Eccles referred to was a lecture published by Dale in 1934, called Pharmacology and nerve endings, describing some of the early research into the physiology of neurotransmission.[3] At that time, only two chemical transmitters were known, acetylcholine and noradrenaline (then thought to be adrenaline).[4] In the peripheral nervous system, cholinergic and adrenergic transmission were known to arise from different groups of nerve fibers. Dale was interested in the possibility that a neuron releasing one of these chemicals in the periphery might also release the same chemical at central synapses. He wrote:


It is to be noted, further, that in the cases for which direct evidence is already available, the phenomena of regeneration appear to indicate that the nature of the chemical function, whether cholinergic or adrenergic, is characteristic for each particular neurone, and unchangeable.[3]

And near the end of the paper:


When we are dealing with two different endings of the same sensory neurone, the one peripheral and concerned with vaso-dilatation and the other at a central synapse, can we suppose that-the discovery and identification of a chemical transmitter of axon-reflex vasodilatation would furnish a hint as to the nature of the transmission process at a central synapse? The possibility has at least some value as a stimulus to further experiment.[3]

With only two transmitter chemicals known to exist at the time, the possibility of a neuron releasing more than one transmitter at a single synapse did not enter anybody's mind, and so no care was taken to frame hypotheses in a way that took this possibility into account. The resulting ambiguity in the initial statements led to some confusion in the literature about the precise meaning of the principle.[5] Nicoll and Malenka, for example, understood it to state that a neuron always releases one and only one neurotransmitter at all of its synapses.[6] In this form it is certainly false. Many neurons are capable of releasing more than one neurotransmitter, in what is called "cotransmission". The discovery of this phenomenon was relatively recent: although there were earlier hints, the first formal proposal did not come until 1976.[7] Recent studies in a myriad of systems have shown that most, if not all, neurons release several different chemical messengers.[8]

In a 1976 publication, however, Eccles reinterpreted the principle in a subtly different way:


"I proposed that Dale’s Principle be defined as stating that at all the axonal branches of a neurone, there was liberation of the same transmitter substance or substances."[9]

The addition of "or substances" is critical. With this change, the principle allows for the possibility of neurons releasing more than one transmitter, and only asserts that the same set are released at all synapses. In this form, it continues to be an important rule of thumb, with only a few known exceptions.,[10] including David Sulzer and Stephen Rayport's finding that dopamine neurons also release glutamate as a neurotransmitter, but at separate release sites.[11] In modern neuroscience, neurons are often classified by their neurotransmitter and most important cotransmitter, for example striatal GABA neurons utilize either opioid peptides or substance P as the primary cotransmitter.

Neurons in a class without a subpopulation of inhibitory interneurons can release at least two neurotransmitters at the same time, the other being a cotransmitter, in order to provide the stabilizing negative feedback required for meaningful encoding.[12] Examples include:
GABA — glycine co-release.
Dopamine — glutamate co-release.
Acetylcholine — glutamate co-release.
Acetylcholine (ACh) — vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) co-release.
Acetylcholine (ACh) — calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) co-release.
Glutamate — dynorphin co-release (in Hippocampus).
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3573141


Please continue...I'm not sure what you are getting at...

Is he schizophrenic? Or are there actually 2 beings...?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13781711


If you go by scripture Zechariah chapter 4 There two that are anointed that are with the lord of the whole earth. Then there is the evil one. So you are looking 4 entities one being the Lord of the earth.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3573141


This...is interesting...The "evil" one...where did he come from? Is this chapter referenced in any way in any other religions or scriptures?
Six Six Six

User ID: 3753361
United States
04/12/2012 05:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Dear "The Nobody"
The purpose of "The Nobody" is to bring about change.

This is a duelistic sense of self, which can often cause conflict and confusion. As the Nobody is by nature both a Creator and Destroyer.

But both aspects are true and pure in the Nobody. As with the yin and yang, light and dark, it provides completion.

The function of this being is to bring about the end of the old (current) world, by causing chaos, death, and destruction. Through this, extinction event, the Nobody accomplishes it's destiny to bring about the new world, through order, life and creation (evolution).

Strangely enough, both is done with love, which is beyond good and evil. This is the secret of the garden of eden and the tree of knowledge. So, yes, love is the core and power of the nobody. Love is the purpose. To bring together the divine male and divine female to it's pre fallen state of connectivity and perfection... through love.

But first, death and destruction to the inhabitants of the earth. All this is symbolized through many ancient cultures mystery religions and their symbology as well. For example, the all seeing eye and the phoenix on the US dollar bill.

It's all quite simple really to see and know, but humans are ignorant and beyond redemption which is why the nobody will destroy humankind and seed the new bloodline of the earth's previous inhabitants.

'Nuff Said

Last Edited by Six Six Six on 04/12/2012 05:42 AM
Biko
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12327867
Canada
04/12/2012 05:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Dear "The Nobody"
Hi,
I am the nobody and sorry if a am a pain in the arse but my heavy medications is causing this sorry.
Scubaseven2

User ID: 14247968
Australia
04/12/2012 05:45 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Dear "The Nobody"
What are you? What is your purpose? Do you know if you're here for good or for evil yet? Do you think love is the real reason you're here? Or the destruction of all mankind? Or none of the above?

Speak your truth. Your own truth. No one else's. In the core of your being...what is your purpose in this existence?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13781711


I do not know who He is, but, I do know what He is here for.

Its not good or evil, it just is.

Good and evil do not exist except in the minds of humans.

As for the destruction of mankind; that is assured. Humans were warned, but were too arrogant and proud to listen.

Just as She was.

Last Edited by Scuba7 on 04/12/2012 05:49 AM
Do not take memories of what happened yesterday, into what might happen today.

When love is your greatest weakness, you will be the strongest person in the world.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 13781711
United States
04/12/2012 05:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Dear "The Nobody"
Change.

The world needs to change.

No, not the world. The people.

The people need to change.

There is no damnation or salvation.

There is only neutrality. As it is in all of existance.

You represent chaos.

We represent order.









































I'm not The Nobody. I am just no one. Same as everyone.
 Quoting: Draakenvuur


And what do you consider chaos pray-tell?

That is one of our faults. Pointing fingers. Finding blame in the "other" when we each have every potential within us. There is no duality. It is an illusion.
iamnotanobodyisimplya​mwhoiam
User ID: 14243774
04/12/2012 05:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Dear "The Nobody"
i am not the nobody but i am beyond the nobody.. for i am who i am.. my purpose is for me to know.. and my work is already complete for the most part.. that being said, my purpose is to live the best life i can and enjoy my abundant blessings as iv already experienced every layer of hell, iv done my time and more.. if any get in my way of happiness and freedom they shall be no more.. plain and simple.. dont fuck with me if you know whats good for ya ;)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13762242
Australia
04/12/2012 05:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Dear "The Nobody"
nobodytardization
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 13781711
United States
04/12/2012 05:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Dear "The Nobody"
The purpose of "The Nobody" is to bring about change.

This is a duelistic sense of self, which can often cause conflict and confusion. As the Nobody is by nature both a Creator and Destroyer.

But both aspects are true and pure in the Nobody. As with the yin and yang, light and dark, it provides completion.

The function of this being is to bring about the end of the old (current) world, by causing chaos, death, and destruction. Through this, extinction event, the Nobody accomplishes it's destiny to bring about the new world, through order, life and creation (evolution).

Strangely enough, both is done with love, which is beyond good and evil. This is the secret of the garden of eden and the tree of knowledge. So, yes, love is the core and power of the nobody. Love is the purpose. To bring together the divine male and divine female to it's pre fallen state of connectivity and perfection... through love.

But first, death and destruction to the inhabitants of the earth. All this is symbolized through many ancient cultures mystery religions and their symbology as well. For example, the all seeing eye and the phoenix on the US dollar bill.

It's all quite simple really to see and know, but humans are ignorant and beyond redemption which is why the nobody will destroy humankind and seed the new bloodline of the earth's previous inhabitants.

'Nuff Said
 Quoting: Six Six Six


Ok...makes sense...BUT why oh why would he want to keep on with a similar cycle when it has obviously accomplished nothing? We keep repeating the same mistakes...what will it take to not have to relive all of this again...and again...and again...
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 13781711
United States
04/12/2012 06:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Dear "The Nobody"
i am not the nobody but i am beyond the nobody.. for i am who i am.. my purpose is for me to know.. and my work is already complete for the most part.. that being said, my purpose is to live the best life i can and enjoy my abundant blessings as iv already experienced every layer of hell, iv done my time and more.. if any get in my way of happiness and freedom they shall be no more.. plain and simple.. dont fuck with me if you know whats good for ya ;)
 Quoting: iamnotanobodyisimplyamwhoiam 14243774


No one is fucking with you, but your work is far from done. Please don't make the mistake of thinking you're finished just to come and live through this shit again. I'm saying this for you and for all of humanity.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14243774
04/12/2012 06:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Dear "The Nobody"
i am not the nobody but i am beyond the nobody.. for i am who i am.. my purpose is for me to know.. and my work is already complete for the most part.. that being said, my purpose is to live the best life i can and enjoy my abundant blessings as iv already experienced every layer of hell, iv done my time and more.. if any get in my way of happiness and freedom they shall be no more.. plain and simple.. dont fuck with me if you know whats good for ya ;)
 Quoting: iamnotanobodyisimplyamwhoiam 14243774


No one is fucking with you, but your work is far from done. Please don't make the mistake of thinking you're finished just to come and live through this shit again. I'm saying this for you and for all of humanity.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13781711


you dont have a say in the matter.. like i said i aint no fucking nobody nor am i anyones savior.. and you dont know where iv been or where iv come from nor can you speak such nonsense when you have no fucking clue.. im outta here.. as far as you know i could be gone tommorow as if i never even came here.. so mind your own and worry about your own shit if you know whats good for ya.. as i stated i aint no fucking nobody i am somebody beyond any body yet i aint no ones savior nor do i give a fuck nor am i a program within the illusion you dwell in.. know your place.. ;)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13449167
United States
04/12/2012 06:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Dear "The Nobody"
"Nobody" can suck it.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 13781711
United States
04/12/2012 06:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Dear "The Nobody"
As for the destruction of mankind; that is assured. Humans were warned, but were too arrogant and proud to listen.

Just as She was.
 Quoting: Scubaseven2


And I hope She's prepared...as I'm sure He is...or at least one of them...

Again though,,,what will it take for us to NOT have to live through this again?

If there is something larger going on...something that hasn't been fought before...representing the end of the universe in its entirety...instead of just the end of human kind...what then? Love has existed where there was fear love could not be found. Between light and dark. Star-crossed love. This needs to be evident to not just mankind, but the universe. The ENTIRE UNIVERSE. That might be the only way to experience a new existence made of pure love...
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 13781711
United States
04/12/2012 06:12 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Dear "The Nobody"
i am not the nobody but i am beyond the nobody.. for i am who i am.. my purpose is for me to know.. and my work is already complete for the most part.. that being said, my purpose is to live the best life i can and enjoy my abundant blessings as iv already experienced every layer of hell, iv done my time and more.. if any get in my way of happiness and freedom they shall be no more.. plain and simple.. dont fuck with me if you know whats good for ya ;)
 Quoting: iamnotanobodyisimplyamwhoiam 14243774


No one is fucking with you, but your work is far from done. Please don't make the mistake of thinking you're finished just to come and live through this shit again. I'm saying this for you and for all of humanity.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13781711


you dont have a say in the matter.. like i said i aint no fucking nobody nor am i anyones savior.. and you dont know where iv been or where iv come from nor can you speak such nonsense when you have no fucking clue.. im outta here.. as far as you know i could be gone tommorow as if i never even came here.. so mind your own and worry about your own shit if you know whats good for ya.. as i stated i aint no fucking nobody i am somebody beyond any body yet i aint no ones savior nor do i give a fuck nor am i a program within the illusion you dwell in.. know your place.. ;)
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14243774


You're filled with to much hate to be the nobody.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14243774
04/12/2012 06:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Dear "The Nobody"
As for the destruction of mankind; that is assured. Humans were warned, but were too arrogant and proud to listen.

Just as She was.
 Quoting: Scubaseven2


And I hope She's prepared...as I'm sure He is...or at least one of them...

Again though,,,what will it take for us to NOT have to live through this again?

If there is something larger going on...something that hasn't been fought before...representing the end of the universe in its entirety...instead of just the end of human kind...what then? Love has existed where there was fear love could not be found. Between light and dark. Star-crossed love. This needs to be evident to not just mankind, but the universe. The ENTIRE UNIVERSE. That might be the only way to experience a new existence made of pure love...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13781711


just because you are so misinformed and keep going on about living through this and so on nonsense.. let me assure you that all is taken care of by the will and grace of the most high lord of all creation and creators.. the source who made you will put you in your place along with the rest.. it is not a collective thing more of an individual thing just so you should know.. just cause the idiots on the low levels work collectively with the same snake mind fake mind doesnt mean everyone isnt accounted for accordingly.. that being said stop dwelling on matters which are beyond and know that the lord is ever present and has taken care of everything from start to end.. just because all you knew was chaos and delusion it doesnt mean the greater truth wasnt active throughout your works in vein.. that being said that which you cannot comprehend nor see nor have any say in what so ever is that which has put you in your place as soon you will all be in the eternities you have earned upon yourselves.. this is the way it is and always has been yet you delusional needy greedy parasitic scum of the world like to complicate matters not only for yourselves but for all around you.. now shut up and know your place.. for your ignorance is really annoying.. yoda
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14243774
04/12/2012 06:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Dear "The Nobody"
i am not the nobody but i am beyond the nobody.. for i am who i am.. my purpose is for me to know.. and my work is already complete for the most part.. that being said, my purpose is to live the best life i can and enjoy my abundant blessings as iv already experienced every layer of hell, iv done my time and more.. if any get in my way of happiness and freedom they shall be no more.. plain and simple.. dont fuck with me if you know whats good for ya ;)
 Quoting: iamnotanobodyisimplyamwhoiam 14243774


No one is fucking with you, but your work is far from done. Please don't make the mistake of thinking you're finished just to come and live through this shit again. I'm saying this for you and for all of humanity.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13781711


you dont have a say in the matter.. like i said i aint no fucking nobody nor am i anyones savior.. and you dont know where iv been or where iv come from nor can you speak such nonsense when you have no fucking clue.. im outta here.. as far as you know i could be gone tommorow as if i never even came here.. so mind your own and worry about your own shit if you know whats good for ya.. as i stated i aint no fucking nobody i am somebody beyond any body yet i aint no ones savior nor do i give a fuck nor am i a program within the illusion you dwell in.. know your place.. ;)
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14243774


You're filled with to much hate to be the nobody.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13781711


think what ever you want.. i clearly stated that i am not a fucking nobody nor am i your savior nor do i give a shit.. i dont know where you get hate from but quite neutral over here actually.. i just wrote a longer post for you to get a better understanding of the matters at hand.. and stop relying on this nobody character to save your asses which you only put in the position you are in..yoda
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 13781711
United States
04/12/2012 06:30 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Dear "The Nobody"
...


No one is fucking with you, but your work is far from done. Please don't make the mistake of thinking you're finished just to come and live through this shit again. I'm saying this for you and for all of humanity.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13781711


you dont have a say in the matter.. like i said i aint no fucking nobody nor am i anyones savior.. and you dont know where iv been or where iv come from nor can you speak such nonsense when you have no fucking clue.. im outta here.. as far as you know i could be gone tommorow as if i never even came here.. so mind your own and worry about your own shit if you know whats good for ya.. as i stated i aint no fucking nobody i am somebody beyond any body yet i aint no ones savior nor do i give a fuck nor am i a program within the illusion you dwell in.. know your place.. ;)
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14243774


You're filled with to much hate to be the nobody.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13781711


think what ever you want.. i clearly stated that i am not a fucking nobody nor am i your savior nor do i give a shit.. i dont know where you get hate from but quite neutral over here actually.. i just wrote a longer post for you to get a better understanding of the matters at hand.. and stop relying on this nobody character to save your asses which you only put in the position you are in..yoda
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14243774


Hah. "Nobody" is relying on him for shit anymore.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 13781711
United States
04/12/2012 06:32 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Dear "The Nobody"
As for the destruction of mankind; that is assured. Humans were warned, but were too arrogant and proud to listen.

Just as She was.
 Quoting: Scubaseven2


And I hope She's prepared...as I'm sure He is...or at least one of them...

Again though,,,what will it take for us to NOT have to live through this again?

If there is something larger going on...something that hasn't been fought before...representing the end of the universe in its entirety...instead of just the end of human kind...what then? Love has existed where there was fear love could not be found. Between light and dark. Star-crossed love. This needs to be evident to not just mankind, but the universe. The ENTIRE UNIVERSE. That might be the only way to experience a new existence made of pure love...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13781711


just because you are so misinformed and keep going on about living through this and so on nonsense.. let me assure you that all is taken care of by the will and grace of the most high lord of all creation and creators.. the source who made you will put you in your place along with the rest.. it is not a collective thing more of an individual thing just so you should know.. just cause the idiots on the low levels work collectively with the same snake mind fake mind doesnt mean everyone isnt accounted for accordingly.. that being said stop dwelling on matters which are beyond and know that the lord is ever present and has taken care of everything from start to end.. just because all you knew was chaos and delusion it doesnt mean the greater truth wasnt active throughout your works in vein.. that being said that which you cannot comprehend nor see nor have any say in what so ever is that which has put you in your place as soon you will all be in the eternities you have earned upon yourselves.. this is the way it is and always has been yet you delusional needy greedy parasitic scum of the world like to complicate matters not only for yourselves but for all around you.. now shut up and know your place.. for your ignorance is really annoying.. yoda
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14243774


Um. No. You assume too much and judge far too often. Love is my only truth and it's the only thing I can live by.